From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] drivers/gpio: Altera soft IP GPIO driver Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 03:04:10 -0800 Message-ID: <1419419050.6157.11.camel@perches.com> References: <1419409345-8297-1-git-send-email-thloh@altera.com> <1419409345-8297-3-git-send-email-thloh@altera.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1419409345-8297-3-git-send-email-thloh@altera.com> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org To: thloh@altera.com Cc: Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Grant Likely , Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Antti Palosaari , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Dinh Nguyen List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-12-24 at 00:22 -0800, thloh@altera.com wrote: > Adds a new driver for Altera soft GPIO IP. The driver is able to > do read/write and allows GPIO to be a interrupt controller. Some trivial comments, some not quite so trivial. > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c [] > +static int altera_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, > + unsigned int type) > +{ > + struct altera_gpio_chip *altera_gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > + > + altera_gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); I presume this multiple initialization of altera_gc is unnecessary duplication. > +static void altera_gpio_irq_edge_handler(unsigned int irq, > + struct irq_desc *desc) > +{ > + struct altera_gpio_chip *altera_gc; > + struct irq_chip *chip; > + struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc; > + unsigned long status; > + int i; > + > + altera_gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); > + chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); > + mm_gc = &altera_gc->mmchip; > + > + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); > + > + while ((status = > + (readl(mm_gc->regs + ALTERA_GPIO_EDGE_CAP) & > + readl(mm_gc->regs + ALTERA_GPIO_IRQ_MASK)))) { > + writel(status, mm_gc->regs + ALTERA_GPIO_EDGE_CAP); > + for_each_set_bit(i, &status, mm_gc->gc.ngpio) { > + generic_handle_irq( > + irq_find_mapping(altera_gc->mmchip.gc.irqdomain > + , i)); That's kind of unpleasant to read. It might be better to use a separate these statements and use a temporary for irq_find_mapping() > +static void altera_gpio_irq_leveL_high_handler(unsigned int irq, > + struct irq_desc *desc) > +{ > + struct altera_gpio_chip *altera_gc; > + struct irq_chip *chip; > + struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc; > + unsigned long status; > + int i; > + > + altera_gc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); > + chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); > + mm_gc = &altera_gc->mmchip; > + > + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); > + > + status = readl(mm_gc->regs + ALTERA_GPIO_DATA); > + status &= readl(mm_gc->regs + ALTERA_GPIO_IRQ_MASK); > + > + for_each_set_bit(i, &status, mm_gc->gc.ngpio) { > + generic_handle_irq( > + irq_find_mapping(altera_gc->mmchip.gc.irqdomain, i)); Maybe a temporary here too > +int altera_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node; > + int id, reg, ret; > + struct altera_gpio_chip *altera_gc; > + > + altera_gc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*altera_gc), GFP_KERNEL); > + > + if (altera_gc == NULL) > + return -ENOMEM; No blank line after the devm_kzalloc please and if (!altera_gc) is more common. > + if (altera_gc->interrupt_trigger == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH) { > + gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(&altera_gc->mmchip.gc, > + &altera_irq_chip, > + altera_gc->mapped_irq, > + altera_gpio_irq_leveL_high_handler); > + } else { > + gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(&altera_gc->mmchip.gc, > + &altera_irq_chip, > + altera_gc->mapped_irq, > + altera_gpio_irq_edge_handler); > + } Sometimes using a ?: ternary is smaller code gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(&altera_gc->mmchip.gc, &altera_irq_chip, altera_gc->mapped_irq, altera_gc->interrupt_trigger == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH ? altera_gpio_irq_leveL_high_handler : altera_gpio_irq_edge_handler); >