From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/1] iio: Added Capella cm3232 ambient light sensor driver. Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 08:42:46 -0800 Message-ID: <1420476166.2652.14.camel@perches.com> References: <1420071030-888-1-git-send-email-ktsai@capellamicro.com> <1420463396.2652.8.camel@perches.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-iio-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Daniel Baluta Cc: Kevin Tsai , Wolfram Sang , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald , Grant Likely , Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Antti Palosaari , Archana Patni , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 16:20 +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 12:51 +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Kevin Tsai wrote: > >> > CM3232 is an advanced ambient light sensor with I2C protocol interface. > >> > The I2C slave address is internally hardwired as 0x10 (7-bit). Writing > >> > to configure register is byte mode, but reading ALS register requests to > >> > use word mode for 16-bit resolution. [] > >> You could directly return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(..). > > > > Sometimes it's better to return a specific value > > for the error instead of depending on correctness > > of all the indirect functions in the call chain. > > > > In this case, all the smbus_xfer functions must > > return 0 on success. Do they? > > Yes. > > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c#L2845 This doesn't show that adapter->algo->smbus_xfer() returns 0, you have to look at the code for that indirectly called function. > Also, I guess kbuild test robot will complain about it, like here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141963536230419&w=2 Is the kbuild test robot now submitting patches for all possible coccinelle simplifications? I don't think so.