From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: sharp,lq101r1sx01: Add compatible for LQ101R1SX03
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:49:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420eb9f-c5d9-c9c3-b71f-37f4f3475c67@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8f05850-1c18-1a7d-e529-08d9a6bd9923@gmail.com>
30.11.2021 18:54, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 30.11.2021 00:32, Rob Herring пишет:
>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 11:07:16PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> From: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com>
>>>
>>> LQ101R1SX03 is compatible with LQ101R1SX01, document it.
>>
>> Then sounds like '"sharp,lq101r1sx03", "sharp,lq101r1sx01"' would be the
>> appropriate compatible value. Do that, and you don't need a driver
>> change.
>
> Apparently you're right. The "sharp,lq101r1sx03" should be a slightly
> improved revision of "sharp,lq101r1sx01". I see now that LQ101R1SX03 is
> sold as a spare part panel for ASUS TF701T, hence these panels should be
> entirely compatible with each other.
>
I mixed up the panel model which TF701T uses.
I compared datasheets of both panel variants. These panel have
differences in the pins configuration. Hence panels seems aren't
compatible in terms of hardware integration, although the difference is
small. They should be compatible from software perspective.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-30 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-14 20:07 [PATCH v1 0/2] Support Sharp LQ101R1SX03 display panel Dmitry Osipenko
2021-11-14 20:07 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: sharp,lq101r1sx01: Add compatible for LQ101R1SX03 Dmitry Osipenko
2021-11-29 21:32 ` Rob Herring
2021-11-30 15:54 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-11-30 19:49 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2021-11-14 20:07 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] drm/panel: sharp: lq101r1sx01: Support LQ101R1SX03 Dmitry Osipenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1420eb9f-c5d9-c9c3-b71f-37f4f3475c67@gmail.com \
--to=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jenneron@protonmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).