From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBC1C433EF for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235306AbhK3Twl (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:52:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45486 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229789AbhK3Twk (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:52:40 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E33BC061574; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:49:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id c32so56690191lfv.4; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:49:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8K75pVFsuu8ZCXFfc/CjEJw0NCecB4BfF8ToqD8iFqU=; b=mNBFAamRrWUChcG1gwN2S41gFDJuZl+hJqwDvHWXC1pAjUfZ73Qy7FxUF/+msZIqt4 xSsRIv2kantBGIJ0Po01y2iiGpz2kjnLf20fHkcUZvoI1JCdBdzvzUuimKkTJfqnmfvV V53d3TdLXTfTH0MQeuuIO3E94J0MahA5HOrJN+3qTLc/IMYdKIWWOWnIdBNEiLskcAt+ Yt53OOWFGel2vvm4YfCm3MhTFityzuP0epHuFa7MtFZK2wyJc8XTWasVmWT205/OnjR4 xs5cyLh1aOdJ0J2POgs5DoAOYUYd1H/B9DZAfmZ5RjW37BGEH6HUA5DGp9l0WRZgDl7F jMGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8K75pVFsuu8ZCXFfc/CjEJw0NCecB4BfF8ToqD8iFqU=; b=e3wYchZxNC0xDYL07hn2wPaOKUdYWpETz88rOy96Tpa3ZmLFWesLOPcH3mVpfa8NtK UqrVJtrmoeacX+CPKZENdif7onc4o0zIk3fTS6elpYXcpP+ZJ+VuorQTz9cuGgLSexVr BV6Oqxgxph41k0j1Ktqw9lFgd/rN+CdM1j/dNg6cTMce8u5SJLyWmokiTcMvJ2SmEgEd ck1R/oHqdHUXUdpkasZeoLq4vlkJ6IqMemZBaaJaWYCW0VUwXaj8uD0LKK1h17f7OpbP SSFRcniRPs2CLValD/ebbfuDQ5+ER9oiH3JA6E/Mbh58/zhwZU5IhYnY3pYN2tqEDWUH fLOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533BlAa4YGxnJdGP+8w0SB+S8RYZ6XbipScvrh3YPojiKVtkPYxV Ti1ImaDzgqMVjYQlxlLccWNbSAo7xzY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfLfsplPH1dyeuTC5k0IL6oVboNjjg/uJwyDib4wGkyfThoCn7gWsr6OdT6/+lwmdIYoxq2Q== X-Received: by 2002:a19:48d7:: with SMTP id v206mr1311365lfa.102.1638301759348; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:49:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.145] (94-29-46-111.dynamic.spd-mgts.ru. [94.29.46.111]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d39sm1814715lfv.78.2021.11.30.11.49.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:49:18 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: sharp,lq101r1sx01: Add compatible for LQ101R1SX03 From: Dmitry Osipenko To: Rob Herring Cc: Thierry Reding , Sam Ravnborg , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Anton Bambura , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211114200717.28986-1-digetx@gmail.com> <20211114200717.28986-2-digetx@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1420eb9f-c5d9-c9c3-b71f-37f4f3475c67@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:49:18 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org 30.11.2021 18:54, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: > 30.11.2021 00:32, Rob Herring пишет: >> On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 11:07:16PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>> From: Anton Bambura >>> >>> LQ101R1SX03 is compatible with LQ101R1SX01, document it. >> >> Then sounds like '"sharp,lq101r1sx03", "sharp,lq101r1sx01"' would be the >> appropriate compatible value. Do that, and you don't need a driver >> change. > > Apparently you're right. The "sharp,lq101r1sx03" should be a slightly > improved revision of "sharp,lq101r1sx01". I see now that LQ101R1SX03 is > sold as a spare part panel for ASUS TF701T, hence these panels should be > entirely compatible with each other. > I mixed up the panel model which TF701T uses. I compared datasheets of both panel variants. These panel have differences in the pins configuration. Hence panels seems aren't compatible in terms of hardware integration, although the difference is small. They should be compatible from software perspective.