From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: Philipp Zabel
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] ARM: dts: Introduce STM32F429 MCU
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:47:58 +0100
Message-ID: <1423828078.4182.17.camel@pengutronix.de>
References: <1423763164-5606-1-git-send-email-mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
<1423763164-5606-13-git-send-email-mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path:
In-Reply-To: <1423763164-5606-13-git-send-email-mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Maxime Coquelin
Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Walleij , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Arnd Bergmann , Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Joe Perches , Antti Palosaari , Tejun Heo , Will Deacon , Nikolay Borisov , Rusty Russell , Kees Cook , Michal
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Hi Maxime,
Am Donnerstag, den 12.02.2015, 18:46 +0100 schrieb Maxime Coquelin:
[...]
> + soc {
> + reset_ahb1: reset@40023810 {
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> + reg = <0x40023810 0x4>;
> + };
> +
> + reset_ahb2: reset@40023814 {
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> + reg = <0x40023814 0x4>;
> + };
> +
> + reset_ahb3: reset@40023818 {
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> + reg = <0x40023818 0x4>;
> + };
> +
> + reset_apb1: reset@40023820 {
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> + reg = <0x40023820 0x4>;
> + };
> +
> + reset_apb2: reset@40023824 {
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> + reg = <0x40023824 0x4>;
> + };
These are mostly consecutive, single registers. I wonder if these are
part of the same IP block and thus should be grouped together into the
same reset controller node?
regards
Philipp