From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] ARM: dts: kirkwood: add stdout-path property to all boards Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:30:21 +0200 Message-ID: <142642785.6KSg8q4tJP@wuerfel> References: <1398862602-29595-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <53615342.8010600@gmail.com> <20140430202130.GE3082@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140430202130.GE3082-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth , Mark Rutland , Thomas Petazzoni , Russell King , Jason Cooper , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , Kumar Gala , Gregory Clement , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 30 April 2014 22:21:30 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Yes, we *can* move it in kirkwood.dtsi, but IMHO we *should* keep it in > > the board files. I see the "chosen" node and its properties as _the_ > > board node. > > > > One could argue then, that we should count the memory properties too and > > put the most common in the SoC dtsi. But you are right, as UART0 is also > > the UART with boot support, it is likely to be always connected to > > a more-or-less accessible console output. > > > > I really have no strong opinion about it. > > Me neithe, but the advantage of putting it in kirkwood.dtsi is that it > then does not get forgotten, and is always there for bearbox to use. I would prefer having it in the board.dts file out of principle, but I agree it's not very important either way. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html