From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Bolle Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] PCI: st: Provide support for the sti PCIe controller Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 12:17:57 +0200 Message-ID: <1428747477.17822.90.camel@x220> References: <1428657168-12495-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org> <1428657168-12495-4-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1428657168-12495-4-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Gabriel FERNANDEZ Cc: Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Srinivas Kandagatla , Maxime Coquelin , Patrice Chotard , Russell King , Bjorn Helgaas , Jingoo Han , Lucas Stach , Fabrice Gasnier , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , Greg KH , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Joe Perches , Tejun Heo , Arnd Bergmann , Viresh Kumar , Thierry Reding List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Something I didn't spot in my first look at this patch. On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 11:12 +0200, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote: > --- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig > > +config PCI_ST > + bool "ST PCIe controller" > + depends on ARCH_STI || (ARM && COMPILE_TEST) > + select PCIE_DW > + help > + Enable PCIe controller support on ST Socs. This controller is based > + on Designware hardware and therefore the driver re-uses the > + Designware core functions to implement the driver. You can't have ARCH_STI without ARM, so ARM will always be set if this driver is enabled. Correct? > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM)) { > + /* > + * We have to hook the abort handler so that we can intercept > + * bus errors when doing config read/write that return UR, > + * which is flagged up as a bus error > + */ > + hook_fault_code(16+6, st_pcie_abort_handler, SIGBUS, 0, > + "imprecise external abort"); > + } So, unless I'm missing something obvious here, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM) will always evaluate to 1. Can't that test be dropped? Paul Bolle