From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: Add DT support for Juno r1 board.
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 15:07:31 +0100
Message-ID: <1431612451.2881.54.camel@linaro.org>
References: <1431537092-19597-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
	 <1431537092-19597-6-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1431537092-19597-6-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 18:11 +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> This board is based on Juno r0 with updated Cortex A5x revisions
> and board errata fixes. It also contains coherent ThinLinks ports
> on the expansion slot that allow for an AXI master on the daughter
> card to participate in a coherency domain.
> 
> Support for SoC PCIe host bridge will be added as a separate series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/Makefile    |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-r1.dts | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-r1.dts
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/Makefile
> index 301a0da..c5c98b9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/Makefile
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS) += foundation-v8.dtb
> -dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS) += juno.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS) += juno.dtb juno-r1.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS) += rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dtb
>  
>  always		:= $(dtb-y)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-r1.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-r1.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f6bc073
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-r1.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
> +/*
> + * ARM Ltd. Juno Platform
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2015 ARM Ltd.
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under a dual GPLv2 or BSD license.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +
> +/ {
> +	model = "ARM Juno development board (r1)";
> +	compatible = "arm,juno", "arm,vexpress";

Is there scope for adding "arm,juno-r1" to the front of that list?
Reason I ask, is that I can't help but think [1] that userside code
(like Android) which wants to select device-specific configuration,
should use something like the devices compatible string rather than what
they currently propose [2].
 
[1] https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-android/2015-April/002743.html
[2] https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-android/2015-April/002742.html

-- 
Tixy