From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yingjoe Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] ARM: add secondary_startup_arm prototype in header file Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 16:56:45 +0800 Message-ID: <1431939405.8312.3.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1431763110-443-1-git-send-email-yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> <1431763110-443-3-git-send-email-yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> <20150516211953.GQ2067@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150516211953.GQ2067-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Matthias Brugger , Mark Rutland , Thomas Gleixner , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Stephen Boyd , Pawel Moll , Catalin Marinas , Daniel Lezcano , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Marc Carino , Rob Herring , linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Sascha Hauer , srv_heupstream , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 22:19 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:02:40AM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > 2015-05-16 9:58 GMT+02:00 Yingjoe Chen : > > > Put secondary_startup_arm() prototype in arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h > > > so users doesn't have to add extern prototype in their code. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen > > > --- > > > arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h > > > index 18f5a55..f5cffb7 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h > > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h > > > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct secondary_data { > > > extern struct secondary_data secondary_data; > > > extern volatile int pen_release; > > > extern void secondary_startup(void); > > > +extern void secondary_startup_arm(void); > > > > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger > > This change should also end up in the patch system as its core ARM stuff, > especially if it's not scheduled for merging through arm-soc. > Russell, Thanks. I just put these 2 patches into the patch system. Since patch 7/9 depends on this patch, I think we should merge this patch(2/9) through arm-soc tree to prevent build fail. Joe.C -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html