[PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: max77686: Use a generic name for the PMIC node in the example

[Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>]

The ePAR standard says that: "the name of a node should be somewhat
generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise
programming model."

So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a generic
node name instead of using the chip's name.

Suggested-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
---

Changes in v2: None

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt
index 8221102d3fc2..d2ed3c20a5c3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ to get matched with their hardware counterparts as follow:
 
 Example:
 
-	max77686@09 {
+	max77686: pmic@09 {
 		compatible = "maxim,max77686";
 		interrupt-parent = <&wakeup_eint>;
 		interrupts = <26 0>;
-- 
2.4.3