From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Haojian Zhuang Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] arm64: dts: add Hi6220 mailbox node Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:41:52 +0800 Message-ID: <1440556912.10987.54.camel@linaro.org> References: <20150824095144.GA7139@leverpostej> <1440411596.3517.12.camel@linaro.org> <20150824114903.GT10728@bivouac.eciton.net> <1440490427.10987.29.camel@linaro.org> <20150825094630.GU10728@bivouac.eciton.net> <1440497710.10987.42.camel@linaro.org> <20150825104256.GB13471@leverpostej> <1440510194.10987.52.camel@linaro.org> <20150825142416.GW10728@bivouac.eciton.net> <20150825153754.GY10728@bivouac.eciton.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150825153754.GY10728-t77nlHhSwNqAroYi2ySoxKxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Leif Lindholm Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Mark Rutland , Dan Zhao , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Jian Zhang , Guangyue Zeng , Yiping Xu , Jassi Brar , Wei Xu , Zhenwei Wang , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Bintian Wang , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "kongfei-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org" , Rob Herring , Haoju Mo , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , "guodong.xu-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 16:37 +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > >> Arm kernel should either fetch memory information from > > >> efi or DT. > > > > > > Absolutely. > > > > > >> Currently arm kernel fetch both efi memory information and > > >> reserved buffer from DTB at the same time. > > > > > > No, it does not. > > > > It should not, but it does. Due to an oversight, the stub removes > > /memreserve/ entries but ignores the reserved-memory node completely. > > Urgh. > > > This was reported here in fact > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.efi/5736/focus=5742 > > > > but there has not been a followup to this series. > > Are all of those patches still relevant, or did some of them go in > already? > > Haojian: can you give that patch a spin and see if it does what you > need, combined with adding the reserved areas to the UEFI memory map? > > / > Leif It's so nice. This patch is what I need. Thanks Haojian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html