From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bayi.cheng Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: mt8173: Add nor flash node Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:49:55 +0800 Message-ID: <1441964995.23394.6.camel@mhfsdcap03> References: <1441705796-11365-1-git-send-email-bayi.cheng@mediatek.com> <1441705796-11365-4-git-send-email-bayi.cheng@mediatek.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+glpam-linux-mediatek=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: Ezequiel Garcia Cc: Mark Rutland , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Sascha Hauer , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Matthias Brugger , Rob Herring , linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Kumar Gala , Jagan Teki , "linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 12:18 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On 8 September 2015 at 08:53, Jagan Teki wrote: > > On 8 September 2015 at 15:19, Bayi Cheng wrote: > >> Add Mediatek nor flash node > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Bayi Cheng > >> --- > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi > >> index d18ee42..a14f005 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi > >> @@ -365,6 +365,16 @@ > >> status = "disabled"; > >> }; > >> > >> + nor_flash: nor@1100d000 { > > > > Based on the comments from 1/3 - this notation needs to be change something like > > qspi0: quadspi@1100d000 > > > > Actually, to follow ePAPR recomendations it should be named as flash@1100d000. > (See ePAPR, 2.2.2 Generic Names Recommendation). > > I believe the phandle name choice can be more descriptive. Thanks for your instruct, I will fix it in the next patch !