From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:56:38 -0500 Message-ID: <1442361398.2909.164.camel@freescale.com> References: <1442307339-15225-1-git-send-email-dongsheng.wang@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1442307339-15225-1-git-send-email-dongsheng.wang@freescale.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Dongsheng Wang Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Chenhui Zhao , alison.wang@freescale.com, Tang Yuantian , robh+dt@kernel.org, jason.jin@freescale.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 16:55 +0800, Dongsheng Wang wrote: > +* Freescale RCPM Wakeup Source Device Tree Bindings > +------------------------------------------- > +Required rcpm-wakeup property should be added to a device node if the > device > +can be used as a wakeup source. > + > + - rcpm-wakeup: The value of the property consists of 3 cells. The first > cell > + is a pointer to the rcpm node, the second cell is the bit mask that > + should be set in IPPDEXPCR0, and the last cell is for IPPDEXPCR1. > + Note: If the platform has no IPPDEXPCR1 register, put a zero here. What if a future platform has more than two of these registers? -Scott