From: Jon Mason <jonmason@broadcom.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] clk: iproc: Separate status and control variables
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 18:57:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1443826665-17570-8-git-send-email-jonmason@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443826665-17570-1-git-send-email-jonmason@broadcom.com>
Some PLLs have separate registers for Status and Control. The means the
pll_base needs to be split into 2 new variables, so that those PLLs can
specify device tree registers for those independently. Also, add a new
driver flag to identify this presence of the split, and let the driver
know that additional registers need to be used.
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jonmason@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc.h | 6 +++
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
index 882aced..c8c993d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ struct iproc_clk {
};
struct iproc_pll {
- void __iomem *pll_base;
+ void __iomem *status_base;
+ void __iomem *control_base;
void __iomem *pwr_base;
void __iomem *asiu_base;
@@ -127,7 +128,7 @@ static int pll_wait_for_lock(struct iproc_pll *pll)
const struct iproc_pll_ctrl *ctrl = pll->ctrl;
for (i = 0; i < LOCK_DELAY; i++) {
- u32 val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->status.offset);
+ u32 val = readl(pll->status_base + ctrl->status.offset);
if (val & (1 << ctrl->status.shift))
return 0;
@@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ static void iproc_pll_write(struct iproc_pll *pll, void __iomem *base,
writel(val, base + offset);
if (unlikely(ctrl->flags & IPROC_CLK_NEEDS_READ_BACK &&
- base == pll->pll_base))
+ (base == pll->status_base || base == pll->control_base)))
val = readl(base + offset);
}
@@ -161,9 +162,9 @@ static void __pll_disable(struct iproc_pll *pll)
}
if (ctrl->flags & IPROC_CLK_EMBED_PWRCTRL) {
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->aon.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->aon.offset);
val |= (bit_mask(ctrl->aon.pwr_width) << ctrl->aon.pwr_shift);
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, ctrl->aon.offset, val);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, ctrl->aon.offset, val);
}
if (pll->pwr_base) {
@@ -184,9 +185,9 @@ static int __pll_enable(struct iproc_pll *pll)
u32 val;
if (ctrl->flags & IPROC_CLK_EMBED_PWRCTRL) {
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->aon.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->aon.offset);
val &= ~(bit_mask(ctrl->aon.pwr_width) << ctrl->aon.pwr_shift);
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, ctrl->aon.offset, val);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, ctrl->aon.offset, val);
}
if (pll->pwr_base) {
@@ -213,9 +214,9 @@ static void __pll_put_in_reset(struct iproc_pll *pll)
const struct iproc_pll_ctrl *ctrl = pll->ctrl;
const struct iproc_pll_reset_ctrl *reset = &ctrl->reset;
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + reset->offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + reset->offset);
val &= ~(1 << reset->reset_shift | 1 << reset->p_reset_shift);
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, reset->offset, val);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, reset->offset, val);
}
static void __pll_bring_out_reset(struct iproc_pll *pll, unsigned int kp,
@@ -226,17 +227,17 @@ static void __pll_bring_out_reset(struct iproc_pll *pll, unsigned int kp,
const struct iproc_pll_reset_ctrl *reset = &ctrl->reset;
const struct iproc_pll_dig_filter_ctrl *dig_filter = &ctrl->dig_filter;
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + dig_filter->offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + dig_filter->offset);
val &= ~(bit_mask(dig_filter->ki_width) << dig_filter->ki_shift |
bit_mask(dig_filter->kp_width) << dig_filter->kp_shift |
bit_mask(dig_filter->ka_width) << dig_filter->ka_shift);
val |= ki << dig_filter->ki_shift | kp << dig_filter->kp_shift |
ka << dig_filter->ka_shift;
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, dig_filter->offset, val);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, dig_filter->offset, val);
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + reset->offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + reset->offset);
val |= 1 << reset->reset_shift | 1 << reset->p_reset_shift;
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, reset->offset, val);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, reset->offset, val);
}
static int pll_set_rate(struct iproc_clk *clk, unsigned int rate_index,
@@ -291,9 +292,9 @@ static int pll_set_rate(struct iproc_clk *clk, unsigned int rate_index,
/* put PLL in reset */
__pll_put_in_reset(pll);
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, ctrl->vco_ctrl.u_offset, 0);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, ctrl->vco_ctrl.u_offset, 0);
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->vco_ctrl.l_offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->vco_ctrl.l_offset);
if (rate >= VCO_LOW && rate < VCO_MID)
val |= (1 << PLL_VCO_LOW_SHIFT);
@@ -303,29 +304,29 @@ static int pll_set_rate(struct iproc_clk *clk, unsigned int rate_index,
else
val |= (1 << PLL_VCO_HIGH_SHIFT);
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, ctrl->vco_ctrl.l_offset, val);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, ctrl->vco_ctrl.l_offset, val);
/* program integer part of NDIV */
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->ndiv_int.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->ndiv_int.offset);
val &= ~(bit_mask(ctrl->ndiv_int.width) << ctrl->ndiv_int.shift);
val |= vco->ndiv_int << ctrl->ndiv_int.shift;
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, ctrl->ndiv_int.offset, val);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, ctrl->ndiv_int.offset, val);
/* program fractional part of NDIV */
if (ctrl->flags & IPROC_CLK_PLL_HAS_NDIV_FRAC) {
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->ndiv_frac.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->ndiv_frac.offset);
val &= ~(bit_mask(ctrl->ndiv_frac.width) <<
ctrl->ndiv_frac.shift);
val |= vco->ndiv_frac << ctrl->ndiv_frac.shift;
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, ctrl->ndiv_frac.offset,
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, ctrl->ndiv_frac.offset,
val);
}
/* program PDIV */
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->pdiv.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->pdiv.offset);
val &= ~(bit_mask(ctrl->pdiv.width) << ctrl->pdiv.shift);
val |= vco->pdiv << ctrl->pdiv.shift;
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, ctrl->pdiv.offset, val);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, ctrl->pdiv.offset, val);
__pll_bring_out_reset(pll, kp, ka, ki);
@@ -372,7 +373,7 @@ static unsigned long iproc_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
return 0;
/* PLL needs to be locked */
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->status.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->status_base + ctrl->status.offset);
if ((val & (1 << ctrl->status.shift)) == 0) {
clk->rate = 0;
return 0;
@@ -383,13 +384,13 @@ static unsigned long iproc_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
*
* ((ndiv_int + ndiv_frac / 2^20) * (parent clock rate / pdiv)
*/
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->ndiv_int.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->ndiv_int.offset);
ndiv_int = (val >> ctrl->ndiv_int.shift) &
bit_mask(ctrl->ndiv_int.width);
ndiv = (u64)ndiv_int << ctrl->ndiv_int.shift;
if (ctrl->flags & IPROC_CLK_PLL_HAS_NDIV_FRAC) {
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->ndiv_frac.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->ndiv_frac.offset);
ndiv_frac = (val >> ctrl->ndiv_frac.shift) &
bit_mask(ctrl->ndiv_frac.width);
@@ -398,7 +399,7 @@ static unsigned long iproc_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
ndiv_frac;
}
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->pdiv.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->pdiv.offset);
pdiv = (val >> ctrl->pdiv.shift) & bit_mask(ctrl->pdiv.width);
clk->rate = (ndiv * parent_rate) >> ctrl->ndiv_int.shift;
@@ -463,14 +464,14 @@ static int iproc_clk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
u32 val;
/* channel enable is active low */
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->enable.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->enable.offset);
val &= ~(1 << ctrl->enable.enable_shift);
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, ctrl->enable.offset, val);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, ctrl->enable.offset, val);
/* also make sure channel is not held */
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->enable.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->enable.offset);
val &= ~(1 << ctrl->enable.hold_shift);
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, ctrl->enable.offset, val);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, ctrl->enable.offset, val);
return 0;
}
@@ -485,9 +486,9 @@ static void iproc_clk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
if (ctrl->flags & IPROC_CLK_AON)
return;
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->enable.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->enable.offset);
val |= 1 << ctrl->enable.enable_shift;
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, ctrl->enable.offset, val);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, ctrl->enable.offset, val);
}
static unsigned long iproc_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
@@ -502,7 +503,7 @@ static unsigned long iproc_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
if (parent_rate == 0)
return 0;
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->mdiv.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->mdiv.offset);
mdiv = (val >> ctrl->mdiv.shift) & bit_mask(ctrl->mdiv.width);
if (mdiv == 0)
mdiv = 256;
@@ -549,14 +550,14 @@ static int iproc_clk_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
if (div > 256)
return -EINVAL;
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->mdiv.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->mdiv.offset);
if (div == 256) {
val &= ~(bit_mask(ctrl->mdiv.width) << ctrl->mdiv.shift);
} else {
val &= ~(bit_mask(ctrl->mdiv.width) << ctrl->mdiv.shift);
val |= div << ctrl->mdiv.shift;
}
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, ctrl->mdiv.offset, val);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, ctrl->mdiv.offset, val);
clk->rate = parent_rate / div;
return 0;
@@ -581,9 +582,10 @@ static void iproc_pll_sw_cfg(struct iproc_pll *pll)
if (ctrl->flags & IPROC_CLK_PLL_NEEDS_SW_CFG) {
u32 val;
- val = readl(pll->pll_base + ctrl->sw_ctrl.offset);
+ val = readl(pll->control_base + ctrl->sw_ctrl.offset);
val |= BIT(ctrl->sw_ctrl.shift);
- iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->pll_base, ctrl->sw_ctrl.offset, val);
+ iproc_pll_write(pll, pll->control_base, ctrl->sw_ctrl.offset,
+ val);
}
}
@@ -618,8 +620,8 @@ void __init iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
if (WARN_ON(!pll->clks))
goto err_clks;
- pll->pll_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
- if (WARN_ON(!pll->pll_base))
+ pll->control_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
+ if (WARN_ON(!pll->control_base))
goto err_pll_iomap;
/* Some SoCs do not require the pwr_base, thus failing is not fatal */
@@ -632,6 +634,16 @@ void __init iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
goto err_asiu_iomap;
}
+ if (pll_ctrl->flags & IPROC_CLK_PLL_SPLIT_STAT_CTRL) {
+ /* Some SoCs have a split status/control. If this does not
+ * exist, assume they are unified.
+ */
+ pll->status_base = of_iomap(node, 2);
+ if (!pll->status_base)
+ goto err_status_iomap;
+ } else
+ pll->status_base = pll->control_base;
+
/* initialize and register the PLL itself */
pll->ctrl = pll_ctrl;
@@ -702,6 +714,10 @@ err_clk_register:
clk_unregister(pll->clk_data.clks[i]);
err_pll_register:
+ if (pll->status_base != pll->control_base)
+ iounmap(pll->status_base);
+
+err_status_iomap:
if (pll->asiu_base)
iounmap(pll->asiu_base);
@@ -709,7 +725,7 @@ err_asiu_iomap:
if (pll->pwr_base)
iounmap(pll->pwr_base);
- iounmap(pll->pll_base);
+ iounmap(pll->control_base);
err_pll_iomap:
kfree(pll->clks);
diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc.h b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc.h
index b71c197..8988de7 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc.h
@@ -55,6 +55,12 @@
#define IPROC_CLK_EMBED_PWRCTRL BIT(5)
/*
+ * Some PLLs have separate registers for Status and Control. Identify this to
+ * let the driver know if additional registers need to be used
+ */
+#define IPROC_CLK_PLL_SPLIT_STAT_CTRL BIT(6)
+
+/*
* Parameters for VCO frequency configuration
*
* VCO frequency =
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-02 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-02 22:57 [PATCH 0/10] clk: iproc: add support for BCM NS, NSP, and NS2 Jon Mason
2015-10-02 22:57 ` [PATCH 01/10] clk: iproc: Add PWRCTRL support Jon Mason
2015-10-02 22:57 ` [PATCH 02/10] clk: nsp: add clock support for Broadcom Northstar Plus SoC Jon Mason
2015-10-09 7:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-09 17:59 ` Jon Mason
2015-10-02 22:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] clk: iproc: define Broadcom NSP iProc clock binding Jon Mason
2015-10-02 22:57 ` [PATCH 04/10] ARM: dts: enable clock support for BCM5301X Jon Mason
2015-10-09 7:35 ` Stephen Boyd
[not found] ` <20151009073540.GO26883-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-09 18:27 ` Jon Mason
2015-10-10 0:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-12 17:57 ` Jon Mason
2015-10-02 22:57 ` [PATCH 05/10] clk: iproc: Add PLL base write function Jon Mason
2015-10-09 7:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-09 18:01 ` Jon Mason
2015-10-10 0:21 ` Stephen Boyd
[not found] ` <20151010002106.GZ26883-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-12 17:48 ` Jon Mason
2015-10-02 22:57 ` [PATCH 06/10] clk: iproc: Split off dig_filter Jon Mason
2015-10-02 22:57 ` Jon Mason [this message]
2015-10-02 22:57 ` [PATCH 08/10] clk: iproc: define Broadcom NS2 iProc clock binding Jon Mason
2015-10-02 22:57 ` [PATCH 09/10] clk: ns2: add clock support for Broadcom Northstar 2 SoC Jon Mason
2015-10-10 0:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-12 17:52 ` Jon Mason
[not found] ` <1443826665-17570-10-git-send-email-jonmason-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-10 0:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-12 18:19 ` Jon Mason
2015-10-13 16:51 ` Scott Branden
2015-10-13 18:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-02 22:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] ARM: dts: enable clock support for Broadcom NS2 Jon Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1443826665-17570-8-git-send-email-jonmason@broadcom.com \
--to=jonmason@broadcom.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).