From: dawei chien <dawei.chien@mediatek.com>
To: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu power cooling model.
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:31:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444908707.23970.6.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9hhoag4dmlg.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 18:26 +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 08:22:40PM +0800, Dawei Chien wrote:
> >> From: "Dawei.Chien" <dawei.chien@mediatek.com>
> >>
> >> This power model is base on Intelligent Power Allocation (IPA) technical,
> >> requires that the operating-points of the CPUs are registered using the
> >> kernel's opp library and the `cpufreq_frequency_table` is assigned to the
> >> `struct device` of the cpu MT8173.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dawei.Chien <dawei.chien@mediatek.com>
> >> ---
> >> This patch is base on
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7034601/
> >> ---
> >> drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c
> >> index 49caed2..9233ec5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c
> >> @@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
> >> #define MAX_VOLT_SHIFT (200000)
> >> #define MAX_VOLT_LIMIT (1150000)
> >> #define VOLT_TOL (10000)
> >> -
> >> +#define CAPACITANCE_CA53 (263)
> >> +#define CAPACITANCE_CA57 (530)
> >> /*
> >> * The struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info holds necessary information for doing CPU DVFS
> >> * on each CPU power/clock domain of Mediatek SoCs. Each CPU cluster in
> >> @@ -51,6 +52,72 @@ struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info {
> >> bool need_voltage_tracking;
> >> };
> >>
> >> +struct mtk_cpu_static_power {
> >> + unsigned long voltage;
> >> + unsigned int power;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +/* measured by WA program. */
> >> +static const struct mtk_cpu_static_power mtk_ca53_static_power[] = {
> >> + {859000, 43},
> >> + {908000, 52},
> >> + {983000, 86},
> >> + {1009000, 123},
> >> + {1028000, 138},
> >> + {1083000, 172},
> >> + {1109000, 180},
> >> + {1125000, 192},
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +/* measured by WA program. */
> >> +static const struct mtk_cpu_static_power mtk_ca57_static_power[] = {
> >> + {828000, 72},
> >> + {867000, 90},
> >> + {927000, 156},
> >> + {968000, 181},
> >> + {1007000, 298},
> >> + {1049000, 435},
> >> + {1089000, 533},
> >> + {1125000, 533},
> >> +};
> >
> > This should be described in the DT, rather than necessitating tonnes of
> > these tables in the kernel.
>
> The above table is a simplification that is tying the static power of a
> device to a voltage (indirectly via frequency for ease of indexing
> perhaps).
>
> We should definitely look at describing the static power model in the
> device tree - but it is not entirely clear what is the best model to
> use as basis for the device tree bindings.
>
> Static power consumption depends on a few different parameters (silicon
> process, voltage, temperature, etc.). The relationship between them
> maybe non-linear and not all of these maybe significant for a given
> platform. e.g., for Juno, we are using a regression based on voltage and
> temperature which was deemed close enough (very subjective tbh).
>
> On the other hand, dynamic power consumption is somewhat simpler and I
> have patches[0][1][2] enabling it's description in device tree. Your comments
> there would be very much appreciated.
>
> As for this patch, I hope it can be moved to using the device tree when
> the bindings for static power are agreed upon. Although sub-optimal, I
> can't see any other way forward for now.
>
> [0] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2011466/focus=130373
> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2011466/focus=2011465
> [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.sensors/37859
Hi Mark/Punit,
Thank you for your nice comments. I will resend this patch with device tree for dynamic/static power model,
and refer to Punit's patches, thank you.
> >
> > Mark.
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-15 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-07 12:22 [PATCH v2 0/2] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu power cooling model Dawei Chien
[not found] ` <1444220561-26139-1-git-send-email-dawei.chien-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-07 12:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Dawei Chien
2015-10-07 15:57 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-12 17:26 ` Punit Agrawal
2015-10-15 11:31 ` dawei chien [this message]
2015-10-07 12:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: mt8173: Add thermal zone node for mt8173 Dawei Chien
[not found] ` <1444220561-26139-3-git-send-email-dawei.chien-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-07 17:56 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1444908707.23970.6.camel@mtksdaap41 \
--to=dawei.chien@mediatek.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djkurtz@chromium.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).