From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yong Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] MT8173 IOMMU SUPPORT Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:30:54 +0800 Message-ID: <1448415054.13079.9.camel@mhfsdcap03> References: <1444357388-30257-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> <20151014125620.GQ27420@8bytes.org> <1445488802.27202.67.camel@mhfsdcap03> <20151023092636.GX27420@8bytes.org> <1448344693.13079.6.camel@mhfsdcap03> <20151124103819.GE17658@ulmo.nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151124103819.GE17658-AwZRO8vwLAwmlAP/+Wk3EA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Daniel Thompson , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org, Tomasz Figa , Rob Herring , linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Matthias Brugger , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, pebolle-IWqWACnzNjzz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org, srv_heupstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, Sricharan R , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Daniel Kurtz , Sasha Hauer , Lucas Stach List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 11:38 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:58:13PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 11:26 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:40:02PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > > > But the mtk-iommu depend on the drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c(mtk-iommu > > > > has called a function of the mtk-smi). > > > > So if there is dependence here, How should we do to merge them? > > > > > > I can surely merge mtk-smi too, if it gets proper Reviewed-by and > > > Acked-by tags from the maintainer(s). > > > > > > > > > Joerg > > > > > Hi Joerg, > > > > About the driver/memory/, We don't know who is his maintainer. > > MAINTAINERS file don't have drivers/memory maintainer. > > From the history in drivers/memory/ it looks like most of the > > drivers land with an ack from the architecture maintainer. > > And Matthias Brugger is our "ARM/Mediatek SoC support" maintainer. > > > > Then do you mean that we need Matthias's ACK or whom others? > > Yes, I think the sub-architecture maintainer's ACK is probably going to > be as good as it gets. Historically drivers/memory hasn't had enough of > a common ground to instate a framework. > > Thierry Got it. Thanks very much for your reply. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek