From: dawei chien <dawei.chien-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Ian Campbell
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
Matthias Brugger
<matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
srv_heupstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
Sascha Hauer <kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu dynamic power cooling model.
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:21:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448878884.29031.49.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151130093042.GA8556@ubuntu>
On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 15:00 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 30-11-15, 17:26, dawei chien wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 11:08 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 27-11-15, 17:32, Dawei Chien wrote:
> > > > MT8173 cpufreq driver use of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register registering
> > > > cooling devices with dynamic power coefficient.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dawei Chien <dawei.chien-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > This patch is base on patchset:
> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/17/251
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c
> > > > index 83001dc..4d39468 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c
> > > > @@ -263,24 +263,34 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +#define DYNAMIC_POWER "dynamic-power-coefficient"
> > > > +
> > > > static void mtk_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > > > {
> > > > struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info = policy->driver_data;
> > > > struct device_node *np = of_node_get(info->cpu_dev->of_node);
> > > > + u32 capacitance;
> > > >
> > > > if (WARN_ON(!np))
> > > > return;
> > > >
> > > > if (of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) {
> > > > - info->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(np,
> > > > - policy->related_cpus);
> > > > + if (!info->cdev) {
> > >
> > > Why will info->cdev be non-NULL here ?
> >
> > This is a error-checking to avoid user or any script by command line hotplug CPU
> > more than two times, we don't need to register cooling device on this case.
>
> Why?
As far as I know, user or shell script has the right for using command online/offline cpu.
Either user by console or shell script could make cpu2 online even cpu2 already onlined.
That could cause of_cpufreq_cooling_register execute many times for the
same cooling device.
"echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/online"
With above hotplug command, mtk_cpufreq_ready will register cooling
device again as well, but fail since the cooling device already created,
so we might need not register cooling device again on this case.
> > I will remove it if you don't agree it.
>
> No, my agreeing or not doesn't matter. If what you are doing is useful
> (and I am not able to understand it), then you should make me
> understand that and don't change your code.
>
> But, I really do not get the reasoning behind the logic. Please
> elaborate that step by step.
Please refer to above explaining, thank you.
> > > > @@ -460,7 +470,9 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > > > {
> > > > struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info = policy->driver_data;
> > > >
> > > > - cpufreq_cooling_unregister(info->cdev);
> > > > + if (info->cdev)
> > > > + cpufreq_cooling_unregister(info->cdev);
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Why do you need to update this?
> >
> > This is a error-checking to avoid user or any script by command line
> > unplug CPU more than two times, we don't need to unregister cooling
> > device on this case.
> >
> > I will remove it if you don't agree it.
>
> Same here.
Please refer to the same reason as above. thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-30 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-27 9:32 [PATCH v4 0/3] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu power cooling model Dawei Chien
2015-11-27 9:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] arm64: dts: mt8173: Add dynamic power node Dawei Chien
[not found] ` <1448616727-29367-1-git-send-email-dawei.chien-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-27 9:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] arm64: dts: mt8173: Add thermal zone node Dawei Chien
2015-11-27 9:32 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu dynamic power cooling model Dawei Chien
2015-11-30 5:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-11-30 9:26 ` dawei chien
2015-11-30 9:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-11-30 10:21 ` dawei chien [this message]
2015-11-30 10:34 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-11-30 12:16 ` dawei chien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448878884.29031.49.camel@mtksdaap41 \
--to=dawei.chien-nus5lvnupcjwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=djkurtz-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=punit.agrawal-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=srv_heupstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).