From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
robh+dt@kernel.org, stigge@antcom.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: lpc32xx: add HCLK PLL output configuration
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 09:28:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1456928920.8721.12.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D685F6.5060400@mleia.com>
Hi Vladimir,
On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 08:19 +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> On 10.02.2016 20:52, slemieux.tyco@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@tycoint.com>
> >
> > This patch add the support to setup the HCLK PLL output
> > using the "assigned-clock-rates" parameter in the device tree.
> >
> > If the option is not use, the clock setup by the kickstart
> > and/or bootloader remain unchanged.
> >
> > The previous kernel version did not change the clock frequency
> > output setup by the kickstart and/or bootloader;
> > this version always setup the clock frequency output to 208MHz.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@tycoint.com>
>
> I've found enough time to test the change and it looks good, so
>
>
> Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
>
>
>
> Do you have any objections, if 208MHz clock is set by default
> in the shared DTSI file i.e.
>
I do not have any objection;
you can add my Acked-by when you submit the patch.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi
> index c58d8da..ecbace8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi
> @@ -294,6 +294,9 @@
>
> clocks = <&xtal_32k>, <&xtal>;
> clock-names = "xtal_32k", "xtal";
> +
> + assigned-clocks = <&clk LPC32XX_CLK_HCLK_PLL>;
> + assigned-clock-rates = <208000000>;
> };
> };
>
> ?
>
> In particular board files the value can be overwritten, however I think
> it is important to have some well defined clock value here to mitigate
> a risk of possible clock rate change done by a bootloader, for example
> the rate may be set to a lower value by a bootloader.
>
> > ---
> > Changes from v1 to v2:
> > - Rename patch title;
> > was "clk: lpc32xx: add clock frequency output configuration"
> > - Update the patch as per the feedback received from:
> > Stephen: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.clk/3913
> > Vladimir: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.clk/3921
> >
> > Note:
> > - There is currently an issue in the current driver;
> > if the HCLK PLL output, configured by the kickstart and/or
> > bootloader, is change by the kernel (ex. 266.5MHz to 208MHz),
> > the serial console is no longer outputing properly.
>
> yep, I'm aware of this issue too, however it is not obvious that
> the rootcause is in the clock driver, so we can discuss this topic
> somewhere else, but let me present a short intro about what I
> see on my end.
>
> In case if PCLK is 266 MHz / 16 ~ 16520833 Hz, UART pre-divider is
> bypassed (X = 1, Y = 1), baudrate is 115200, then I observe corrupted
> I/O but correctly set divisor latch registers (DLM = 0, DLL = 9):
>
> 16520833 / 16 / 9 ~ 114728
>
> But if I change DLL to 7 as I should do in assumption
> that PCLK is 13 MHz, then UART I/O is *not* corrupted.
>
> The same happens if I modify UART pre-divider, for example UART
> clock rate is 16520833, baudrate is 115200, X = 27, Y = 242,
> DLM = 0, DLL = 1:
>
> 16520833 / 16 * 27 / 242 ~ 115202 -- but I/O is corrupted
>
> And if I change to X = 19, Y = 134 as I should do in case of
> PCLK = 13 MHz, then console UART is working fine.
>
> It looks like UART clock is always pinned to 13 MHz (how is it
> possible technically?), but this contradicts to the datasheet IMHO.
>
> --
> With best wishes,
> Vladimir
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-10 18:52 [PATCH v2] clk: lpc32xx: add HCLK PLL output configuration slemieux.tyco
[not found] ` <1455130352-25860-1-git-send-email-slemieux.tyco-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-02-10 20:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-02 6:19 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-03-02 14:28 ` Sylvain Lemieux [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1456928920.8721.12.camel@localhost \
--to=slemieux.tyco@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stigge@antcom.de \
--cc=vz@mleia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).