From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Subject: [PATCH v15 1/6] efi: ARM/arm64: ignore DT memory nodes instead of removing them
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:59:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1457481587-8976-2-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457481587-8976-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
There are two problems with the UEFI stub DT memory node removal
routine:
- it deletes nodes as it traverses the tree, which happens to work
but is not supported, as deletion invalidates the node iterator;
- deleting memory nodes entirely may discard annotations in the form
of additional properties on the nodes.
Since the discovery of DT memory nodes occurs strictly before the
UEFI init sequence, we can simply clear the memblock memory table
before parsing the UEFI memory map. This way, it is no longer
necessary to remove the nodes, so we can remove that logic from the
stub as well.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
---
drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c | 8 ++++++++
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c | 24 +-----------------------
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
index 9e15d57..40c9d85 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
@@ -143,6 +143,14 @@ static __init void reserve_regions(void)
if (efi_enabled(EFI_DBG))
pr_info("Processing EFI memory map:\n");
+ /*
+ * Discard memblocks discovered so far: if there are any at this
+ * point, they originate from memory nodes in the DT, and UEFI
+ * uses its own memory map instead.
+ */
+ memblock_dump_all();
+ memblock_remove(0, ULLONG_MAX);
+
for_each_efi_memory_desc(&memmap, md) {
paddr = md->phys_addr;
npages = md->num_pages;
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c
index cf7b7d4..9df1560 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ efi_status_t update_fdt(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, void *orig_fdt,
unsigned long map_size, unsigned long desc_size,
u32 desc_ver)
{
- int node, prev, num_rsv;
+ int node, num_rsv;
int status;
u32 fdt_val32;
u64 fdt_val64;
@@ -54,28 +54,6 @@ efi_status_t update_fdt(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, void *orig_fdt,
goto fdt_set_fail;
/*
- * Delete any memory nodes present. We must delete nodes which
- * early_init_dt_scan_memory may try to use.
- */
- prev = 0;
- for (;;) {
- const char *type;
- int len;
-
- node = fdt_next_node(fdt, prev, NULL);
- if (node < 0)
- break;
-
- type = fdt_getprop(fdt, node, "device_type", &len);
- if (type && strncmp(type, "memory", len) == 0) {
- fdt_del_node(fdt, node);
- continue;
- }
-
- prev = node;
- }
-
- /*
* Delete all memory reserve map entries. When booting via UEFI,
* kernel will use the UEFI memory map to find reserved regions.
*/
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 23:59 [PATCH v15 0/6] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms David Daney
2016-03-08 23:59 ` David Daney [this message]
[not found] ` <1457481587-8976-2-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-18 12:26 ` [PATCH v15 1/6] efi: ARM/arm64: ignore DT memory nodes instead of removing them Matt Fleming
2016-03-18 12:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu8STa=tF0o1qje6LorYxzBon704Q_O2U=cvigg9v53hZw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-18 12:56 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20160318125600.GT2619-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-18 13:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-03-08 23:59 ` [PATCH v15 4/6] arm64: Move unflatten_device_tree() call earlier David Daney
[not found] ` <1457481587-8976-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-08 23:59 ` [PATCH v15 2/6] Documentation, dt, numa: dt bindings for NUMA David Daney
2016-03-08 23:59 ` [PATCH v15 3/6] of, numa: Add NUMA of binding implementation David Daney
2016-03-08 23:59 ` [PATCH v15 5/6] arm64, numa: Add NUMA support for arm64 platforms David Daney
[not found] ` <1457481587-8976-6-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-13 14:09 ` Steve Capper
2016-04-13 14:30 ` Steve Capper
2016-03-08 23:59 ` [PATCH v15 6/6] arm64, mm, numa: Add NUMA balancing support for arm64 David Daney
2016-03-22 18:48 ` [PATCH v15 0/6] arm64, numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms Jon Masters
[not found] ` <56F1936E.1090407-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-22 21:45 ` David Daney
[not found] ` <56F1BD15.4000701-M3mlKVOIwJVv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-05 13:08 ` Graeme Gregory
2016-04-05 13:08 ` Graeme Gregory
2016-04-05 13:08 ` Graeme Gregory
2016-04-05 13:08 ` Graeme Gregory
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1457481587-8976-2-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--to=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@cavium.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).