From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Ianovich Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] rtc: rewrite DS1302 using SPI Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:38:15 +0300 Message-ID: <1458297495.3499.29.camel@gmail.com> References: <1456105286-28598-1-git-send-email-ynvich@gmail.com> <1456224900-4877-1-git-send-email-ynvich@gmail.com> <20160315001844.GJ28277@piout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160315001844.GJ28277@piout.net> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexandre Belloni , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Alessandro Zummo , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "open list:REAL TIME CLOCK RTC SUBSYSTEM" , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 01:18 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > I would like to have a solution for secureedge5410 even if it is > untested. Else, we are breaking an existing platform without any > solution. > > I've put the sh maintainers in copy, maybe they have an opinion. Else > I'll let your patch sit in linux-next for the next cycle. secureedge5410 will need an SPI host driver. The driver will be similar to the one I did for lp8841. I can make a clone for secureedge5410, but I cannot test it. The only reason, I didn't file the patch for secureedge5410, is I thought SPI people won't accept an untested patch.