From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keerthy Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: devicetree: bindings: regulator: palmas-pmic.txt Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:12:43 +0530 Message-ID: <1459255363-21101-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com Cc: spatton@ti.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, j-keerthy@ti.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org From: Schuyler Patton Adding support for the tps659038 pmic so it doesn't generate a warning when running the patch check script to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt Adding a note that the tps659037 device is a OTP spin of the tps659038 pmic and device compatible. Signed-off-by: Schuyler Patton Signed-off-by: Keerthy --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt index 725393c..9987281 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt @@ -1,5 +1,12 @@ * palmas regulator IP block devicetree bindings +The tps659038 for the AM57x class have OTP spins that +have different part numbers but the same functionality. There +is not a need to add the OTP spins to the palmas driver. The +spin devices should use the tps659038 as it's compatible value. +This is the list of those devices: +tps659037 + Required properties: - compatible : Should be from the list ti,twl6035-pmic @@ -8,6 +15,7 @@ Required properties: ti,tps65913-pmic ti,tps65914-pmic ti,tps65917-pmic + ti,tps659038-pmic and also the generic series names ti,palmas-pmic - interrupt-parent : The parent interrupt controller which is palmas. -- 1.9.1