From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/18] Add support for FDMA DMA controller and slim core rproc found on STi chipsets Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 09:40:49 -0700 Message-ID: <1467823249.8360.28.camel@perches.com> References: <1467795276-21725-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1467795276-21725-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Griffin , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, vinod.koul@intel.com, patrice.chotard@st.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 09:54 +0100, Peter Griffin wrote: > This patchset adds support for the Flexible Direct Memory Access (FDM= A) core > found on STi chipsets from STMicroelectronics. The FDMA is a slim cor= e CPU > with a dedicated firmware. It is a general purpose DMA controller sup= porting > 16 independent channels and data can be moved from memory to memory o= r between > memory and paced latency critical real time targets. [] > =A0include/linux/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.h=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0|=A0=A053 ++ Is this directory really necessary? Why shouldn't this file be local to drivers/remoteproc/?