[PATCH V11 0/3] Add watchdog DT nodes and use syscon regmap interface to configure pmu registers

[PATCH V11 0/3] Add watchdog DT nodes and use syscon regmap interface to configure pmu registers

[Leela Krishna Amudala]

This patchset does the following things
	- Adds pmusysreg device node to exynos5.dtsi file
	- Adds watchdog DT nodes to Exynos5250 and 5420
	- Uses syscon regmap interface to configure pmu registers
	  to mask/unmask enable/disable of watchdog.
	
This patch set is rebased on Kgene's for-next branch and tested on SMDK5420

changes since V10:
	- followed coding style rules
	- removed duplicate error message suggested by Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

changes since V9:
	- added descriptions to s3c2410_wdt_variant structure fields
	- moved calling s3c2410wdt_mask_and_disable_reset() function above s3c2410wdt_start() call in probe
	- put dev_err message back to s3c2410wdt_mask_and_disable_reset() function
	  (suggested by Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>)

changes since V8:
	- modified the patch description for the below patch
	  "watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: use syscon regmap interface to configure pmu register"
	- removed MODULE_ALIAS in watchdog driver
	- changed dev_warn to dev_err in one failure case handling (suggested by Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>)
	- renamed variable name from pmu_config to drv_data
	- changed the compatible field description in documentation file
	  (suggested by Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>)

changes since V7:
	- re-ordered the patches in the series
	- moved pmu_config_s3c2410 structure out of ifdef CONFIG_OF
	  and limited only this structure to platform match table
	- renamed structure name from s3c_wdt_driver_ids to s3c2410_wdt_ids
	- removed exynos variants from platform match table
	  (suggested by Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>)

changes since V6:
	- added SoC-specific compatible value to syscon node and documented it
	- given more patch description for below patch
	  ARM: dts: update watchdog device nodes for Exynos5250 and Exynos5420
	- added platform_device_id array for watchdog devices
	- selected MFD_SYSCON in Kconfig entry for watchdog

Changes since V5:
	- removed status property in DT nodes
	- changed the return type for the function s3c2410wdt_mask_and_disable_reset()
	  and handled error cases
	- Handled to get driver data in non-DT cases
	- Addressed comments given by Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>

Changes since V4:
	- changed the node name from pmusysreg to syscon and node label from pmu_sys_reg to pmu_syscon
	- changed the property name from samsung,pmusysreg to samsung,syscon-phandle
	- used regmap_update_bits instead of remap_read/regmap_write
	- Addressed other comments given by Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>

Changes since V3:
	- changed the compatible strings for watchdog node
	- splitted up adding pmusysreg node and made it separate patch
	- Addressed comments given by Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>

Changes since V2:
	- used syscon regmap interface to configure pmu registers in WDT driver
	  (suggested by Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>)

Changes since V1:
        - Added new compatible string for Exynos5 SoCs
        - Introduced quirk mechanism to program PMU registers
        - Addressed comments given by Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>

Leela Krishna Amudala (3):
  ARM: dts: Add pmu sysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files
  watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: use syscon regmap interface to configure pmu
    register
  ARM: dts: update watchdog device nodes for Exynos5250 and Exynos5420

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt        |   16 ++
 .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.txt   |   21 ++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi                     |    7 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi                  |   11 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi                  |   14 ++
 drivers/watchdog/Kconfig                           |    1 +
 drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c                     |  159 ++++++++++++++++++--
 7 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt

-- 
1.7.10.4

[PATCH V11 1/3] ARM: dts: Add pmu sysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files

[Leela Krishna Amudala]

This patch adds pmusysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files to
handle PMU register accesses in a centralized way using syscon driver

Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi                     |    5 +++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi                     |    5 +++++
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..307e727
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+SAMSUNG Exynos SoC series PMU Registers
+
+Properties:
+ - name : should be 'syscon';
+ - compatible : should contain two values. First value must be one from following list:
+		   - "samsung,exynos5250-pmu" - for Exynos5250 SoC,
+		   - "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" - for Exynos5420 SoC.
+		second value must be always "syscon".
+
+ - reg : offset and length of the register set.
+
+Example :
+pmu_syscon: syscon@10040000 {
+	compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", "syscon";
+	reg = <0x10040000 0x5000>;
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
index 9db5047..2f264ad 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
@@ -163,6 +163,11 @@
 		interrupts = <0 47 0>;
 	};
 
+	pmu_syscon: syscon@10040000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", "syscon";
+		reg = <0x10040000 0x5000>;
+	};
+
 	watchdog {
 		clocks = <&clock 336>;
 		clock-names = "watchdog";
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
index 09aa06c..06e97a7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
@@ -310,4 +310,9 @@
 		clocks = <&clock 431>, <&clock 143>;
 		clock-names = "mixer", "sclk_hdmi";
 	};
+
+	pmu_syscon: syscon@10040000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-pmu", "syscon";
+		reg = <0x10040000 0x5000>;
+	};
 };
-- 
1.7.10.4

[PATCH V11 2/3] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: use syscon regmap interface to configure pmu register

[Leela Krishna Amudala]

Add device tree support for exynos5250 and 5420 SoCs and use syscon regmap interface
to configure AUTOMATIC_WDT_RESET_DISABLE and MASK_WDT_RESET_REQUEST registers of PMU
to mask/unmask enable/disable of watchdog in probe and s2r scenarios.

Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.txt   |   21 ++-
 drivers/watchdog/Kconfig                           |    1 +
 drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c                     |  159 ++++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.txt
index 2aa486c..cfff375 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.txt
@@ -5,10 +5,29 @@ after a preset amount of time during which the WDT reset event has not
 occurred.
 
 Required properties:
-- compatible : should be "samsung,s3c2410-wdt"
+- compatible : should be one among the following
+	(a) "samsung,s3c2410-wdt" for Exynos4 and previous SoCs
+	(b) "samsung,exynos5250-wdt" for Exynos5250
+	(c) "samsung,exynos5420-wdt" for Exynos5420
+
 - reg : base physical address of the controller and length of memory mapped
 	region.
 - interrupts : interrupt number to the cpu.
+- samsung,syscon-phandle : reference to syscon node (This property required only
+	in case of compatible being "samsung,exynos5250-wdt" or "samsung,exynos5420-wdt".
+	In case of Exynos5250 and 5420 this property points to syscon node holding the PMU
+	base address)
 
 Optional properties:
 - timeout-sec : contains the watchdog timeout in seconds.
+
+Example:
+
+watchdog@101D0000 {
+	compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-wdt";
+	reg = <0x101D0000 0x100>;
+	interrupts = <0 42 0>;
+	clocks = <&clock 336>;
+	clock-names = "watchdog";
+	samsung,syscon-phandle = <&pmu_syscon>;
+};
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
index 5be6e91..24738c0 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ config S3C2410_WATCHDOG
 	tristate "S3C2410 Watchdog"
 	depends on HAVE_S3C2410_WATCHDOG
 	select WATCHDOG_CORE
+	select MFD_SYSCON if ARCH_EXYNOS5
 	help
 	  Watchdog timer block in the Samsung SoCs. This will reboot
 	  the system when the timer expires with the watchdog enabled.
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
index 7d8fd04..47f4dcf 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
 
 #define S3C2410_WTCON		0x00
 #define S3C2410_WTDAT		0x04
@@ -60,6 +62,10 @@
 #define CONFIG_S3C2410_WATCHDOG_ATBOOT		(0)
 #define CONFIG_S3C2410_WATCHDOG_DEFAULT_TIME	(15)
 
+#define WDT_DISABLE_REG_OFFSET		0x0408
+#define WDT_MASK_RESET_REG_OFFSET	0x040c
+#define QUIRK_NEEDS_PMU_CONFIG		(1 << 0)
+
 static bool nowayout	= WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT;
 static int tmr_margin;
 static int tmr_atboot	= CONFIG_S3C2410_WATCHDOG_ATBOOT;
@@ -83,6 +89,25 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(soft_noboot, "Watchdog action, set to 1 to ignore reboots, "
 			"0 to reboot (default 0)");
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Watchdog debug, set to >1 for debug (default 0)");
 
+/**
+ * struct s3c2410_wdt_variant - Per-variant config data
+ *
+ * @disable_reg: Offset in pmureg for the register that disables the watchdog
+ * timer reset functionality.
+ * @mask_reset_reg: Offset in pmureg for the register that masks the watchdog
+ * timer reset functionality.
+ * @mask_bit: Bit number for the watchdog timer in the disable register and the
+ * mask reset register.
+ * @quirks: A bitfield of quirks.
+ */
+
+struct s3c2410_wdt_variant {
+	int disable_reg;
+	int mask_reset_reg;
+	int mask_bit;
+	u32 quirks;
+};
+
 struct s3c2410_wdt {
 	struct device		*dev;
 	struct clk		*clock;
@@ -93,8 +118,50 @@ struct s3c2410_wdt {
 	unsigned long		wtdat_save;
 	struct watchdog_device	wdt_device;
 	struct notifier_block	freq_transition;
+	struct s3c2410_wdt_variant *drv_data;
+	struct regmap *pmureg;
 };
 
+static const struct s3c2410_wdt_variant drv_data_s3c2410 = {
+	.quirks = 0
+};
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static const struct s3c2410_wdt_variant drv_data_exynos5250  = {
+	.disable_reg = WDT_DISABLE_REG_OFFSET,
+	.mask_reset_reg = WDT_MASK_RESET_REG_OFFSET,
+	.mask_bit = 20,
+	.quirks = QUIRK_NEEDS_PMU_CONFIG
+};
+
+static const struct s3c2410_wdt_variant drv_data_exynos5420 = {
+	.disable_reg = WDT_DISABLE_REG_OFFSET,
+	.mask_reset_reg = WDT_MASK_RESET_REG_OFFSET,
+	.mask_bit = 0,
+	.quirks = QUIRK_NEEDS_PMU_CONFIG
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id s3c2410_wdt_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-wdt",
+	  .data = &drv_data_s3c2410 },
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-wdt",
+	  .data = &drv_data_exynos5250 },
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-wdt",
+	  .data = &drv_data_exynos5420 },
+	{},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, s3c2410_wdt_match);
+#endif
+
+static const struct platform_device_id s3c2410_wdt_ids[] = {
+	{
+		.name = "s3c2410-wdt",
+		.driver_data = (unsigned long)&drv_data_s3c2410,
+	},
+	{}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, s3c2410_wdt_ids);
+
 /* watchdog control routines */
 
 #define DBG(fmt, ...)					\
@@ -110,6 +177,31 @@ static inline struct s3c2410_wdt *freq_to_wdt(struct notifier_block *nb)
 	return container_of(nb, struct s3c2410_wdt, freq_transition);
 }
 
+static int s3c2410wdt_mask_and_disable_reset(struct s3c2410_wdt *wdt, bool mask)
+{
+	int ret;
+	u32 mask_val = 1 << wdt->drv_data->mask_bit;
+	u32 val = 0;
+
+	if (mask)
+		val = mask_val;
+
+	ret = regmap_update_bits(wdt->pmureg,
+			wdt->drv_data->disable_reg,
+			mask_val, val);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto error;
+
+	ret = regmap_update_bits(wdt->pmureg,
+			wdt->drv_data->mask_reset_reg,
+			mask_val, val);
+ error:
+	if (ret < 0)
+		dev_err(wdt->dev, "failed to update reg(%d)\n", ret);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int s3c2410wdt_keepalive(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
 {
 	struct s3c2410_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
@@ -331,6 +423,20 @@ static inline void s3c2410wdt_cpufreq_deregister(struct s3c2410_wdt *wdt)
 }
 #endif
 
+/* s3c2410_get_wdt_driver_data */
+static inline struct s3c2410_wdt_variant *
+get_wdt_drv_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
+		const struct of_device_id *match;
+		match = of_match_node(s3c2410_wdt_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
+		return (struct s3c2410_wdt_variant *)match->data;
+	} else {
+		return (struct s3c2410_wdt_variant *)
+			platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
+	}
+}
+
 static int s3c2410wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev;
@@ -353,6 +459,16 @@ static int s3c2410wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	spin_lock_init(&wdt->lock);
 	wdt->wdt_device = s3c2410_wdd;
 
+	wdt->drv_data = get_wdt_drv_data(pdev);
+	if (wdt->drv_data->quirks & QUIRK_NEEDS_PMU_CONFIG) {
+		wdt->pmureg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
+							"samsung,syscon-phandle");
+		if (IS_ERR(wdt->pmureg)) {
+			dev_err(dev, "syscon regmap lookup failed.\n");
+			return PTR_ERR(wdt->pmureg);
+		}
+	}
+
 	wdt_irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
 	if (wdt_irq == NULL) {
 		dev_err(dev, "no irq resource specified\n");
@@ -421,6 +537,12 @@ static int s3c2410wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto err_cpufreq;
 	}
 
+	if (wdt->drv_data->quirks & QUIRK_NEEDS_PMU_CONFIG) {
+		ret = s3c2410wdt_mask_and_disable_reset(wdt, false);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			goto err_unregister;
+	}
+
 	if (tmr_atboot && started == 0) {
 		dev_info(dev, "starting watchdog timer\n");
 		s3c2410wdt_start(&wdt->wdt_device);
@@ -445,6 +567,9 @@ static int s3c2410wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	return 0;
 
+ err_unregister:
+	watchdog_unregister_device(&wdt->wdt_device);
+
  err_cpufreq:
 	s3c2410wdt_cpufreq_deregister(wdt);
 
@@ -458,8 +583,15 @@ static int s3c2410wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 static int s3c2410wdt_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
 {
+	int ret;
 	struct s3c2410_wdt *wdt = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
 
+	if (wdt->drv_data->quirks & QUIRK_NEEDS_PMU_CONFIG) {
+		ret = s3c2410wdt_mask_and_disable_reset(wdt, true);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
 	watchdog_unregister_device(&wdt->wdt_device);
 
 	s3c2410wdt_cpufreq_deregister(wdt);
@@ -474,6 +606,9 @@ static void s3c2410wdt_shutdown(struct platform_device *dev)
 {
 	struct s3c2410_wdt *wdt = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
 
+	if (wdt->drv_data->quirks & QUIRK_NEEDS_PMU_CONFIG)
+		s3c2410wdt_mask_and_disable_reset(wdt, true);
+
 	s3c2410wdt_stop(&wdt->wdt_device);
 }
 
@@ -481,12 +616,19 @@ static void s3c2410wdt_shutdown(struct platform_device *dev)
 
 static int s3c2410wdt_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
+	int ret;
 	struct s3c2410_wdt *wdt = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 
 	/* Save watchdog state, and turn it off. */
 	wdt->wtcon_save = readl(wdt->reg_base + S3C2410_WTCON);
 	wdt->wtdat_save = readl(wdt->reg_base + S3C2410_WTDAT);
 
+	if (wdt->drv_data->quirks & QUIRK_NEEDS_PMU_CONFIG) {
+		ret = s3c2410wdt_mask_and_disable_reset(wdt, true);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
 	/* Note that WTCNT doesn't need to be saved. */
 	s3c2410wdt_stop(&wdt->wdt_device);
 
@@ -495,6 +637,7 @@ static int s3c2410wdt_suspend(struct device *dev)
 
 static int s3c2410wdt_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
+	int ret;
 	struct s3c2410_wdt *wdt = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 
 	/* Restore watchdog state. */
@@ -502,6 +645,12 @@ static int s3c2410wdt_resume(struct device *dev)
 	writel(wdt->wtdat_save, wdt->reg_base + S3C2410_WTCNT);/* Reset count */
 	writel(wdt->wtcon_save, wdt->reg_base + S3C2410_WTCON);
 
+	if (wdt->drv_data->quirks & QUIRK_NEEDS_PMU_CONFIG) {
+		ret = s3c2410wdt_mask_and_disable_reset(wdt, false);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
 	dev_info(dev, "watchdog %sabled\n",
 		(wdt->wtcon_save & S3C2410_WTCON_ENABLE) ? "en" : "dis");
 
@@ -512,18 +661,11 @@ static int s3c2410wdt_resume(struct device *dev)
 static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(s3c2410wdt_pm_ops, s3c2410wdt_suspend,
 			s3c2410wdt_resume);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
-static const struct of_device_id s3c2410_wdt_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-wdt" },
-	{},
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, s3c2410_wdt_match);
-#endif
-
 static struct platform_driver s3c2410wdt_driver = {
 	.probe		= s3c2410wdt_probe,
 	.remove		= s3c2410wdt_remove,
 	.shutdown	= s3c2410wdt_shutdown,
+	.id_table	= s3c2410_wdt_ids,
 	.driver		= {
 		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
 		.name	= "s3c2410-wdt",
@@ -538,4 +680,3 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Ben Dooks <ben@simtec.co.uk>, "
 	      "Dimitry Andric <dimitry.andric@tomtom.com>");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("S3C2410 Watchdog Device Driver");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-MODULE_ALIAS("platform:s3c2410-wdt");
-- 
1.7.10.4

[PATCH V11 3/3] ARM: dts: update watchdog device nodes for Exynos5250 and Exynos5420

[Leela Krishna Amudala]

In Exynos5 series SoCs, PMU has registers to enable/disable mask/unmask
watchdog timer which is not the case with s3c series SoCs so, there is a
need to have different compatible names for watchdog to handle these pmu
registers access.

Hence this patch removes watchdog node from Exynos5.dtsi common file and
make it separate by updating existing node in Exynos5250 and adding new node
to Exynos5420. This patch also makes the watchdog node enabled by default

Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi    |    7 -------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi |    6 +++++-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi |    9 +++++++++
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
index 074739d..de6a606 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
@@ -102,13 +102,6 @@
 		status = "disabled";
 	};
 
-	watchdog {
-		compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-wdt";
-		reg = <0x101D0000 0x100>;
-		interrupts = <0 42 0>;
-		status = "disabled";
-	};
-
 	fimd@14400000 {
 		compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-fimd";
 		interrupt-parent = <&combiner>;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
index 2f264ad..54df046 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
@@ -168,9 +168,13 @@
 		reg = <0x10040000 0x5000>;
 	};
 
-	watchdog {
+	watchdog@101D0000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-wdt";
+		reg = <0x101D0000 0x100>;
+		interrupts = <0 42 0>;
 		clocks = <&clock 336>;
 		clock-names = "watchdog";
+		samsung,syscon-phandle = <&pmu_syscon>;
 	};
 
 	g2d@10850000 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
index 06e97a7..f5a0076 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
@@ -315,4 +315,13 @@
 		compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-pmu", "syscon";
 		reg = <0x10040000 0x5000>;
 	};
+
+        watchdog@101D0000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-wdt";
+		reg = <0x101D0000 0x100>;
+		interrupts = <0 42 0>;
+		clocks = <&clock 316>;
+		clock-names = "watchdog";
+		samsung,syscon-phandle = <&pmu_syscon>;
+        };
 };
-- 
1.7.10.4

Re: [PATCH V11 2/3] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: use syscon regmap interface to configure pmu register

[Doug Anderson]

Leela Krishna,

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala
<l.krishna-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Add device tree support for exynos5250 and 5420 SoCs and use syscon regmap interface
> to configure AUTOMATIC_WDT_RESET_DISABLE and MASK_WDT_RESET_REQUEST registers of PMU
> to mask/unmask enable/disable of watchdog in probe and s2r scenarios.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.txt   |   21 ++-
>  drivers/watchdog/Kconfig                           |    1 +
>  drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c                     |  159 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Tested on ARM Chromebook in a backport to 3.8.  See
<https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/177932/3> for this
patch.

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH V11 1/3] ARM: dts: Add pmu sysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files

[Olof Johansson]

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala
<l.krishna@samsung.com> wrote:
> This patch adds pmusysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files to
> handle PMU register accesses in a centralized way using syscon driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt |   16 ++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi                     |    5 +++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi                     |    5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..307e727
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +SAMSUNG Exynos SoC series PMU Registers
> +
> +Properties:
> + - name : should be 'syscon';

It's common to use a non-abbreviated name, such as 'system-controller'
here. Or, given that it's referring to "pmusysreg" then maybe
something like "pmu-system-registers".

> + - compatible : should contain two values. First value must be one from following list:
> +                  - "samsung,exynos5250-pmu" - for Exynos5250 SoC,
> +                  - "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" - for Exynos5420 SoC.
> +               second value must be always "syscon".



-Olof

Re: [PATCH V11 1/3] ARM: dts: Add pmu sysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files

[Tomasz Figa]

On Monday 02 of December 2013 10:50:14 Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala
> <l.krishna@samsung.com> wrote:
> > This patch adds pmusysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files to
> > handle PMU register accesses in a centralized way using syscon driver
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> > Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt |   16 ++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi                     |    5 +++++
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi                     |    5 +++++
> >  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..307e727
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> > +SAMSUNG Exynos SoC series PMU Registers
> > +
> > +Properties:
> > + - name : should be 'syscon';
> 
> It's common to use a non-abbreviated name, such as 'system-controller'
> here. Or, given that it's referring to "pmusysreg" then maybe
> something like "pmu-system-registers".

Hmm, it's two syscons vs two system-controllers in existing device trees.
I agree that system-controller sounds much better as a name for this class
of devices. I don't remember why I initially suggested syscon, though.
Possibly based on those two existing device trees using this name.

Best regards,
Tomasz

Re: [PATCH V11 1/3] ARM: dts: Add pmu sysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files

[Doug Anderson]

Leela Krishna,

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday 02 of December 2013 10:50:14 Olof Johansson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala
>> <l.krishna@samsung.com> wrote:
>> > This patch adds pmusysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files to
>> > handle PMU register accesses in a centralized way using syscon driver
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>> > Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>> > ---
>> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt |   16 ++++++++++++++++
>> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi                     |    5 +++++
>> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi                     |    5 +++++
>> >  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
>> >
>> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 0000000..307e727
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>> > +SAMSUNG Exynos SoC series PMU Registers
>> > +
>> > +Properties:
>> > + - name : should be 'syscon';
>>
>> It's common to use a non-abbreviated name, such as 'system-controller'
>> here. Or, given that it's referring to "pmusysreg" then maybe
>> something like "pmu-system-registers".
>
> Hmm, it's two syscons vs two system-controllers in existing device trees.
> I agree that system-controller sounds much better as a name for this class
> of devices. I don't remember why I initially suggested syscon, though.
> Possibly based on those two existing device trees using this name.

I'd vote for using "pmu-system-registers".  We end up using the
"syscon" subsystem but really we're describing pmu registers.

I'd even say that you don't need to formally specify the "name" in the
bindings (though I'm not up with all the latest device tree
requirements).  ...still you'd want to use "pmu-system-registers" in
the DTS changes.

Can you spin up a v12?

Thanks!

-Doug

Re: [PATCH V11 2/3] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: use syscon regmap interface to configure pmu register

[Doug Anderson]

Leela Krishna,

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> Leela Krishna,
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala
> <l.krishna@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Add device tree support for exynos5250 and 5420 SoCs and use syscon regmap interface
>> to configure AUTOMATIC_WDT_RESET_DISABLE and MASK_WDT_RESET_REQUEST registers of PMU
>> to mask/unmask enable/disable of watchdog in probe and s2r scenarios.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.txt   |   21 ++-
>>  drivers/watchdog/Kconfig                           |    1 +
>>  drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c                     |  159 ++++++++++++++++++--
>>  3 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Based on feedback in another patch series, perhaps you can incorporate
<https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3290551/> and spin a v12?

-Doug

Re: [PATCH V11 1/3] ARM: dts: Add pmu sysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files

[Tomasz Figa]

On Thursday 05 of December 2013 10:26:18 Doug Anderson wrote:
> Leela Krishna,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Monday 02 of December 2013 10:50:14 Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala
> >> <l.krishna@samsung.com> wrote:
> >> > This patch adds pmusysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files to
> >> > handle PMU register accesses in a centralized way using syscon driver
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
> >> > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> >> > Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> >> > Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> >> > ---
> >> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt |   16 ++++++++++++++++
> >> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi                     |    5 +++++
> >> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi                     |    5 +++++
> >> >  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> >> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
> >> > new file mode 100644
> >> > index 0000000..307e727
> >> > --- /dev/null
> >> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt
> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> >> > +SAMSUNG Exynos SoC series PMU Registers
> >> > +
> >> > +Properties:
> >> > + - name : should be 'syscon';
> >>
> >> It's common to use a non-abbreviated name, such as 'system-controller'
> >> here. Or, given that it's referring to "pmusysreg" then maybe
> >> something like "pmu-system-registers".
> >
> > Hmm, it's two syscons vs two system-controllers in existing device trees.
> > I agree that system-controller sounds much better as a name for this class
> > of devices. I don't remember why I initially suggested syscon, though.
> > Possibly based on those two existing device trees using this name.
> 
> I'd vote for using "pmu-system-registers".  We end up using the
> "syscon" subsystem but really we're describing pmu registers.
> 
> I'd even say that you don't need to formally specify the "name" in the
> bindings (though I'm not up with all the latest device tree
> requirements).  ...still you'd want to use "pmu-system-registers" in
> the DTS changes.

Well, since the name should specify the class of device, I would say that
pmu-system-registers is too specific. If we want to change this, I'd say
we should go with system-controller.

As for name specification inside the binding, I agree that binding should
not require the main node to be named specifically. If we want to have
another version anyway, let's drop this.

Best regards,
Tomasz

Re: [PATCH V11 1/3] ARM: dts: Add pmu sysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files

[Doug Anderson]

Tomasz,

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd vote for using "pmu-system-registers".  We end up using the
>> "syscon" subsystem but really we're describing pmu registers.
>>
>> I'd even say that you don't need to formally specify the "name" in the
>> bindings (though I'm not up with all the latest device tree
>> requirements).  ...still you'd want to use "pmu-system-registers" in
>> the DTS changes.
>
> Well, since the name should specify the class of device, I would say that
> pmu-system-registers is too specific. If we want to change this, I'd say
> we should go with system-controller.

...but the "compatible" is "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", "syscon", right?
That means that the class of the device is "exynos5250-pmu", right?
It is also compatible with the generic "syscon" class of devices.

> As for name specification inside the binding, I agree that binding should
> not require the main node to be named specifically. If we want to have
> another version anyway, let's drop this.

That sounds good to me.  So drop the "name" part in the bindings file
and then apply this discussion to patch #3 in this series (the one
that touches the .dtsi files).

-Doug

Re: [PATCH V11 1/3] ARM: dts: Add pmu sysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files

[Tomasz Figa]

On Thursday 05 of December 2013 10:35:20 Doug Anderson wrote:
> Tomasz,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I'd vote for using "pmu-system-registers".  We end up using the
> >> "syscon" subsystem but really we're describing pmu registers.
> >>
> >> I'd even say that you don't need to formally specify the "name" in the
> >> bindings (though I'm not up with all the latest device tree
> >> requirements).  ...still you'd want to use "pmu-system-registers" in
> >> the DTS changes.
> >
> > Well, since the name should specify the class of device, I would say that
> > pmu-system-registers is too specific. If we want to change this, I'd say
> > we should go with system-controller.
> 
> ...but the "compatible" is "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", "syscon", right?
> That means that the class of the device is "exynos5250-pmu", right?

Nope. "samsung,exynos5250-pmu" is the specific device (or hardware
programming interface) this device is compatible with.

With class I mean the generic kind of device, such as system-controller,
i2c, pinctrl, display, etc., as specified by sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 of
ePAPR.

Anyway, node names are just a matter of coding style, as they don't have
any semantical meaning in most cases (such as this one).

> It is also compatible with the generic "syscon" class of devices.

It is also compatible with the generic "syscon" programming interface,
which represents a set of loosely related registers that control various
aspects of other IP blocks.

Best regards,
Tomasz

Re: [PATCH V11 1/3] ARM: dts: Add pmu sysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files

[Doug Anderson]

Tomasz,

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 05 of December 2013 10:35:20 Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Tomasz,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I'd vote for using "pmu-system-registers".  We end up using the
>> >> "syscon" subsystem but really we're describing pmu registers.
>> >>
>> >> I'd even say that you don't need to formally specify the "name" in the
>> >> bindings (though I'm not up with all the latest device tree
>> >> requirements).  ...still you'd want to use "pmu-system-registers" in
>> >> the DTS changes.
>> >
>> > Well, since the name should specify the class of device, I would say that
>> > pmu-system-registers is too specific. If we want to change this, I'd say
>> > we should go with system-controller.
>>
>> ...but the "compatible" is "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", "syscon", right?
>> That means that the class of the device is "exynos5250-pmu", right?
>
> Nope. "samsung,exynos5250-pmu" is the specific device (or hardware
> programming interface) this device is compatible with.
>
> With class I mean the generic kind of device, such as system-controller,
> i2c, pinctrl, display, etc., as specified by sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 of
> ePAPR.
>
> Anyway, node names are just a matter of coding style, as they don't have
> any semantical meaning in most cases (such as this one).
>
>> It is also compatible with the generic "syscon" class of devices.
>
> It is also compatible with the generic "syscon" programming interface,
> which represents a set of loosely related registers that control various
> aspects of other IP blocks.

OK.  I will certainly cede to your superior knowledge of device tree
conventions.

Leela Krishna: unless someone else comes up with a convincing
argument, it sounds like the dts files should have the name
"system-controller" and the bindings change should remove all
references to the name.

-Doug