From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
To: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>
Cc: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@gmail.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] xen/arm: Add a clock property
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:07:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <146914607316.8780.7961396342647226841@resonance> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1607141132000.26575@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>
Quoting Stefano Stabellini (2016-07-14 03:38:04)
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Dirk Behme wrote:
> > On 13.07.2016 23:03, Michael Turquette wrote:
> > > Quoting Dirk Behme (2016-07-13 11:56:30)
> > > > On 13.07.2016 20:43, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Dirk Behme wrote:
> > > > > > On 13.07.2016 00:26, Michael Turquette wrote:
> > > > > > > Quoting Dirk Behme (2016-07-12 00:46:45)
> > > > > > > > Clocks described by this property are reserved for use by Xen, and
> > > > > > > > the OS
> > > > > > > > must not alter their state any way, such as disabling or gating a
> > > > > > > > clock,
> > > > > > > > or modifying its rate. Ensuring this may impose constraints on
> > > > > > > > parent
> > > > > > > > clocks or other resources used by the clock tree.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Note that clk_prepare_enable will not prevent the rate from changing
> > > > > > > (clk_set_rate) or a parent from changing (clk_set_parent). The only
> > > > > > > way
> > > > > > > to do this currently would be to set the following flags on the
> > > > > > > effected
> > > > > > > clocks:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > CLK_SET_RATE_GATE
> > > > > > > CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regarding setting flags, I think we already talked about that. I think
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > conclusion was that in our case its not possible to manipulate the
> > > > > > flags in
> > > > > > the OS as this isn't intended to be done in cases like ours. Therefore
> > > > > > no API
> > > > > > is exported for this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I.e. if we need to set these flags, we have to do that in Xen where we
> > > > > > add the
> > > > > > clocks to the hypervisor node in the device tree. And not in the
> > > > > > kernel patch
> > > > > > discussed here.
> > > > >
> > > > > These are internal Linux flags, aren't they?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I've been under the impression that you can set clock "flags" via the
> > > > device tree. Seems I need to re-check that ;)
> > >
> > > Right, you cannot set flags from the device tree. Also, setting these
> > > flags is done by the clock provider driver, not a consumer. Xen is the
> > > consumer.
> >
> >
> > Ok, thanks, then I think we can forget about using flags for the issue we are
> > discussing here.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Dirk
> >
> > P.S.: Would it be an option to merge the v4 patch we are discussing here,
> > then? From the discussion until here, it sounds to me that it's the best
> > option we have at the moment. Maybe improving it in the future, then.
>
> It might be a step in the right direction, but it doesn't really prevent
> clk_set_rate from changing properties of a clock owned by Xen. This
> patch is incomplete. We need to understand at least what it would take
> to have a complete solution.
>
> Michael, do you have any suggestions on how it would be possible to set
> CLK_SET_RATE_GATE and CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE for those clocks in a proper
> way?
No, there is no way for a consumer to do that. The provider must do it.
>
> Like you wrote, I would imagine it needs to be done by the clock
> provider driver. Maybe to do that, it would be easier to have a new
> device tree property on the clock node, rather than listing phandle and
> clock-specifier pairs under the Xen node?
Upon further reflection, I think that your clock consumer can probably
use clk_set_rate_range() to "lock" in a rate. This is good because it is
exactly what a clock consumer should do:
1) get the clk
2) enable the clk
3) set the required rate for the clock
4) set rate range constraints, or conversely,
5) lock in an exact rate; set the min/max rate to the same value
The problem with this solution is that it requires the consumer to have
knowledge of the rates that it wants for that clock, which I guess is
something that Linux kernels in a Xen setup do not want/need?
Is it correct that you would prefer some sort of never_touch_this_clk()
api?
Regards,
Mike
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-22 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-12 7:46 [PATCH v4] xen/arm: Add a clock property Dirk Behme
2016-07-12 22:26 ` Michael Turquette
2016-07-13 8:35 ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-13 18:43 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-13 18:56 ` [Xen-devel] " Dirk Behme
2016-07-13 21:03 ` Michael Turquette
2016-07-14 6:31 ` Dirk Behme
[not found] ` <7df784ab-d0c0-939b-393e-214535c4b191-V5te9oGctAVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-14 10:14 ` Julien Grall
2016-07-14 10:32 ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-14 10:38 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-14 10:49 ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-14 15:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-14 16:30 ` Dirk Behme
[not found] ` <5787BE0B.8060504-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-14 17:14 ` Julien Grall
2016-07-15 7:53 ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-22 0:07 ` Michael Turquette [this message]
2016-07-22 1:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-27 5:05 ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-28 11:17 ` Julien Grall
2016-07-28 14:35 ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-14 10:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-13 18:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-13 18:47 ` [Xen-devel] " Dirk Behme
2016-07-13 19:07 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-14 6:11 ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-14 10:28 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-20 9:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-07-20 11:01 ` Julien Grall
2016-07-20 11:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] ` <CAMuHMdWeJjcuBHjnjppc5Ys5Ew8VssXzg=dLpLPCOQaBnUo_7Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-20 12:10 ` Julien Grall
[not found] ` <04d9dbfb-196d-a775-7fbb-526aba8085f4-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-20 12:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-07-20 12:53 ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-20 13:21 ` Julien Grall
2016-07-22 0:14 ` Michael Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=146914607316.8780.7961396342647226841@resonance \
--to=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dirk.behme@de.bosch.com \
--cc=dirk.behme@gmail.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox