devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>
To: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>, Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>,
	<nm@ti.com>, <vigneshr@ti.com>, <kristo@kernel.org>,
	<robh@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: <hnagalla@ti.com>, <jm@ti.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Udit Kumar" <kumar1@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7*-ti-ipc-firmware: Switch MCU R5F cluster to Split-mode
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 21:26:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <146ffb9c-e0f8-479b-b6fe-322786be0e20@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a3f4271-ada2-48aa-b99d-023619ec5e12@ti.com>

Hello Andrew,

On 8/15/2025 9:18 PM, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 8/14/25 5:38 PM, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
>> Several TI K3 SoCs like J7200, J721E, J721S2, J784S4 and J742S2 have a
>> R5F cluster in the MCU domain which is configured for LockStep mode at
>> the moment. The necessary support to use MCU R5F cluster in split mode
>> was added in the bootloader. And the TI IPC firmware for the split
>> processors is already available public.
>>
>> Therefore, Switch this R5F cluster to Split mode by default in all the
>> boards using TI IPC Firmware config (k3-j7*-ti-ipc-firmware). This
>> gives out an extra general purpose R5F core free to run any applications
>> as required. Lockstep mode remains default in the SoC level dtsi, so
>> downstream board dts which do not use TI IPC Firmware config should not
>> be impacted by this switch.
>>
>> Users who prefer to use the fault-tolerant lockstep mode with TI IPC
>> firmware config, can do that by setting `ti,cluster-mode` property to 1.
>
> What a user prefers and other configuration like that does not belong
> in devicetree, which should only describe the hardware.
>
> Configuration should be done using the normal methods, like kernel
> cmdline, module params, ioctls, etc.. Maybe we can even set the mode
> based on some signal in the firmware itself, like in the resource table.
>
Agreed configuration part ,

but as default, what this CPU should be lock-step or cluster-mode


> Andrew
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
>> ---
>> [..]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-18 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-14 22:38 [PATCH 00/33] Refactor TI IPC DT configs into dtsi Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 01/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: Enable remote processors at board level Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-15  2:30   ` Kumar, Udit
2025-08-22 16:32     ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-08-15 15:38   ` Andrew Davis
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 02/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-ti-ipc-firmware: Refactor IPC cfg into new dtsi Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 03/33] Revert "arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-sk: Fix reversed C6x carveout locations" Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-15  2:35   ` Kumar, Udit
2025-08-22 16:26     ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 04/33] Revert "arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-beagleboneai64: " Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 05/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e: Enable remote processors at board level Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 06/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-beagleboneai64: Add missing cfg for TI IPC FW Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-15 15:42   ` Andrew Davis
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 07/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-ti-ipc-firmware: Refactor IPC cfg into new dtsi Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 08/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2: Enable remote processors at board level Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 09/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2-ti-ipc-firmware: Refactor IPC cfg into new dtsi Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 10/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-j742s2: Enable remote processors at board level Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 11/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-j742s2-ti-ipc-firmware-common: Refactor IPC cfg into new dtsi Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 12/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-ti-ipc-firmware: " Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 13/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-j722s: Enable remote processors at board level Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 14/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j722s-ti-ipc-firmware: Refactor IPC cfg into new dtsi Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 15/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am6*-boards: Add label to reserved-memory node Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 16/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-verdin: Add missing cfg for TI IPC Firmware Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-18 19:39   ` Hiago De Franco
2025-08-21  6:06   ` Francesco Dolcini
2025-08-22 16:39     ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-08-23 16:43       ` Francesco Dolcini
2025-08-25  4:39         ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 17/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-ti-ipc-firmware: Refactor IPC cfg into new dtsi Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 18/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-verdin: Add missing cfg for TI IPC Firmware Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-18 19:37   ` Hiago De Franco
2025-08-21  6:12   ` Francesco Dolcini
2025-08-22 16:46     ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 19/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-pocketbeagle2: " Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 20/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62: Enable Mailbox nodes at the board level Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-21  6:03   ` Francesco Dolcini
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 21/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62: Enable remote processors at " Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 22/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-ti-ipc-firmware: Refactor IPC cfg into new dtsi Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 23/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a: Enable Mailbox nodes at the board level Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 24/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a: Enable remote processors at " Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 25/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a-ti-ipc-firmware: Refactor IPC cfg into new dtsi Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 26/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: Enable remote processors at board level Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 27/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-sr-som: Add missing cfg for TI IPC Firmware Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 28/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64-phycore-som: " Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 29/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-tqma64xxl: " Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 30/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64-ti-ipc-firmware: Refactor IPC cfg into new dtsi Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 31/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65: Enable remote processors at board level Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 32/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-ti-ipc-firmware: Refactor IPC cfg into new dtsi Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 33/33] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7*-ti-ipc-firmware: Switch MCU R5F cluster to Split-mode Beleswar Padhi
2025-08-15  2:41   ` Kumar, Udit
2025-08-15  3:13     ` Nishanth Menon
2025-08-15 15:48   ` Andrew Davis
2025-08-18 15:56     ` Kumar, Udit [this message]
2025-08-22 17:26     ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-08-22 17:31       ` Andrew Davis
2025-08-15  5:49 ` [PATCH 00/33] Refactor TI IPC DT configs into dtsi Wadim Egorov
2025-08-22 17:00   ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=146ffb9c-e0f8-479b-b6fe-322786be0e20@ti.com \
    --to=u-kumar1@ti.com \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=b-padhi@ti.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hnagalla@ti.com \
    --cc=jm@ti.com \
    --cc=kristo@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kumar1@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).