Re: [PATCH v9 01/10] clk: fix initial state of critical clock's parents

[James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>]

Hi Stephen,

On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 17:39 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/12, James Liao wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 14:09 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > (Including lists)
> > > 
> > > On 08/09, James Liao wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 13:46 +0800, James Liao wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Mike,
> > > >>
> > > >> Do you have new patches to fix new clock parents? If not, I think we can
> > > >> use my patch first. Is it okay?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Hi Stephen,
> > > >
> > > > Do you have comments for the bug fixing? I prefer to use my patch (clk:
> > > > fix initial state of critical clock's parents). How do you think?
> > > >
> > > 
> > > How about we recalc accuracies and rates in addition to the patch
> > > from Mike? That will fix everything?
> > 
> > Hi Stephen,
> > 
> > It works!
> > 
> > I'll send a new series of MT2701 clock support in few days. Should I
> > include this patch in my series? Or you'll merge it into clk-next
> > directly?
> > 
> 
> Thanks. I can take that as a tested-by? I can merge it into

Yes, please feel free to add:

Tested-by: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>

> clk-next directly, but do we need to put the mt2701 patches on a
> separate branch to merge into arm-soc? If so we'll need to put
> this patch first to avoid bisection failures.

I prefer to merge clk driver into mainline first. Patches that depend on
mt2701 clks such as dtsi can base on next kernel release.


Best regards,

James