Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 02/13] drivers: clk: st: Simplify clock binding of STiH4xx platforms

[Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>]

Quoting Gabriel Fernandez (2016-08-22 09:06:20)
> Hi Mike,
> 
> you forgot me ?
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Gabriel
> 
> 
> On 07/11/2016 08:58 AM, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 07/08/2016 06:08 PM, Michael Turquette wrote:
> >> Quoting Gabriel Fernandez (2016-07-08 02:12:35)
> >>> Hi Mike,
> >>>
> >>> On 07/08/2016 03:43 AM, Michael Turquette wrote:
> >>>> Quoting Rob Herring (2016-06-19 08:04:58)
> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:20:22AM +0200, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
> >>>>>> This patch reworks the clock binding to avoid too much detail in DT.
> >>>>>> Now we have only compatible string per type of clock
> >>>>>> (remark from Rob https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/25/492)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> I have no idea what the clock trees and clock controller in these 
> >>>>> chips
> >>>>> look like, so it's hard to say if the changes here are good. It still
> >>>>> looks like things are somewhat fine grained clocks in DT. I'll leave
> >>>>> it up to the platform maintainers to decide...
> >>>> Is this series breaking ABI? If yes, why not do what Maxime did for 
> >>>> the
> >>>> Allwinner/sunxi clocks and just fully convert over to a
> >>>> one-node-per-clock-controller binding? This one-node-per-clock 
> >>>> stuff is
> >>>> pretty unfortunate, and if we're deprecating platforms (patch #1) then
> >>>> now might be a good time to re-evaluate the whole thing.
> >>> The goal of my patchset was to be aligned with DRM / KMS development 
> >>> and
> >>> to offer
> >>> the possibility to make a correct video playback on STiH407/STiH410
> >>> platform.
> >>> Our milestone is the 4.8 for that.
> >>>
> >>> Currently people need these patches to work.
> >>> I'm not sure it's a good time to re-evaluate the whole thing.
> >>>
> >>> Is it possible to re-evaluate later ?
> >> Are you OK to break ABI later? Or at a minimum, deprecate the current
> >> binding (maintain it forever for legacy platforms) and create a new
> >> clock controller binding description that supersedes the legacy binding
> >> for all new platforms?
> >>
> >> If the answer to either question is "yes", then I'm OK to put it aside
> >> for now. But if the answer to both is "no", and this patch series is
> >> breaking ABI, then we really should fix it now.
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> > i m ok to break ABI later.

Hi Gabriel,

This change never received any other reviews, and no pings before v4.7
was released. Sorry that it fell through the cracks, but always feel
free to re-ping leading up to the merge window.

Can you rebase this against -rc1? Also, do you have a plan to rework the
binding to move away from the one-node-per-clock style?

Regards,
Mike

> >
> > Many Thanks !
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Gabriel.
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Mike
> >>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Gabriel
> >>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Mike
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>    .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-mux.txt | 2 +-
> >>>>>>    .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-pll.txt | 11 ++--
> >>>>>>    .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen.txt     | 2 +-
> >>>>>>    .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,quadfs.txt     | 6 +--
> >>>>>>    drivers/clk/st/clkgen-fsyn.c                       | 41 
> >>>>>> ++++++--------
> >>>>>>    drivers/clk/st/clkgen-mux.c                        | 28 
> >>>>>> ++++------
> >>>>>>    drivers/clk/st/clkgen-pll.c                        | 62 
> >>>>>> ++++++++++------------
> >>>>>>    7 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git 
> >>>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-mux.txt 
> >>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-mux.txt
> >>>>>> index 4d277d6..9a46cb1d7 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-mux.txt
> >>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-mux.txt
> >>>>>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ This binding uses the common clock binding[1].
> >>>>>>    Required properties:
> >>>>>>       - compatible : shall be:
> >>>>>> -     "st,stih407-clkgen-a9-mux",     "st,clkgen-mux"
> >>>>>> +     "st,stih407-clkgen-a9-mux"
> >>>>>>       - #clock-cells : from common clock binding; shall be set to 0.
> >>>>>>    diff --git 
> >>>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-pll.txt 
> >>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-pll.txt
> >>>>>> index c9fd674..be0b043 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-pll.txt
> >>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-pll.txt
> >>>>>> @@ -9,11 +9,10 @@ Base address is located to the parent node. See 
> >>>>>> clock binding[2]
> >>>>>>    Required properties:
> >>>>>>       - compatible : shall be:
> >>>>>> -     "st,stih407-plls-c32-a0", "st,clkgen-plls-c32"
> >>>>>> -     "st,stih407-plls-c32-a9", "st,clkgen-plls-c32"
> >>>>>> -     "sst,plls-c32-cx_0", "st,clkgen-plls-c32"
> >>>>>> -     "sst,plls-c32-cx_1", "st,clkgen-plls-c32"
> >>>>>> -     "st,stih418-plls-c28-a9", "st,clkgen-plls-c32"
> >>>>>> +     "st,clkgen-pll0"
> >>>>>> +     "st,clkgen-pll0"
> >>>>> Repeated. Supposed to be 0 and 1? This seems a bit generic, too.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +     "st,stih407-clkgen-plla9"
> >>>>>> +     "st,stih418-clkgen-plla9"
> >
>