[PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks

[PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks

[gabriel.fernandez]

From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>

v2:
 - rename compatible property "st,stm32f46xx-rcc" into "st,stm32f469-rcc"
 - cosmetic: remove bad copy/paste

This patch-set introduce RTC and QSPI clocks for STM32F4 socs
RTC clock has 3 parents clock oscillators (lsi/lse/hse_rtc)

example to use rtc clock:

		rtc: rtc@40002800 {
			compatible = "st,stm32-rtc";
			reg = <0x40002800 0x400>;
			...
			clocks = <&rcc 1 CLK_RTC>;

			assigned-clocks =  <&rcc 1 CLK_RTC>;
			assigned-clock-parents = <&rcc 1 CLK_LSE>;
			...
		};

Gabriel Fernandez (6):
  clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks
  ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks
  arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON
  clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock
  clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock
  ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock

 .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32-rcc.txt     |   4 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi                   |  18 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts              |   4 +
 arch/arm/configs/stm32_defconfig                   |   1 +
 drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c                          | 442 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 5 files changed, 447 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH v2 1/6] clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks

[gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o]

From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>

This patch introduces the support of the LSI & LSE clocks.
The clock drivers needs to disable the power domain write protection
using syscon/regmap to enable these clocks.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 134 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
index 02d6810..789a8f77 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
@@ -19,10 +19,14 @@
 #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+#include <linux/ioport.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
 
 #define STM32F4_RCC_PLLCFGR		0x04
 #define STM32F4_RCC_CFGR		0x08
@@ -31,6 +35,8 @@
 #define STM32F4_RCC_AHB3ENR		0x38
 #define STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR		0x40
 #define STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR		0x44
+#define STM32F4_RCC_BDCR		0x70
+#define STM32F4_RCC_CSR			0x74
 
 struct stm32f4_gate_data {
 	u8	offset;
@@ -120,13 +126,13 @@ struct stm32f4_gate_data {
 	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 26,	"ltdc",		"apb2_div" },
 };
 
+enum { SYSTICK, FCLK, CLK_LSI, CLK_LSE, END_PRIMARY_CLK };
 /*
  * MAX_CLKS is the maximum value in the enumeration below plus the combined
  * hweight of stm32f42xx_gate_map (plus one).
  */
-#define MAX_CLKS 74
+#define MAX_CLKS (71 + END_PRIMARY_CLK + 1)
 
-enum { SYSTICK, FCLK };
 
 /*
  * This bitmask tells us which bit offsets (0..192) on STM32F4[23]xxx
@@ -259,7 +265,7 @@ static int stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(u8 primary, u8 secondary)
 	u64 table[ARRAY_SIZE(stm32f42xx_gate_map)];
 
 	if (primary == 1) {
-		if (WARN_ON(secondary > FCLK))
+		if (WARN_ON(secondary >= END_PRIMARY_CLK))
 			return -EINVAL;
 		return secondary;
 	}
@@ -276,7 +282,7 @@ static int stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(u8 primary, u8 secondary)
 	table[BIT_ULL_WORD(secondary)] &=
 	    GENMASK_ULL(secondary % BITS_PER_LONG_LONG, 0);
 
-	return FCLK + hweight64(table[0]) +
+	return END_PRIMARY_CLK - 1 + hweight64(table[0]) +
 	       (BIT_ULL_WORD(secondary) >= 1 ? hweight64(table[1]) : 0) +
 	       (BIT_ULL_WORD(secondary) >= 2 ? hweight64(table[2]) : 0);
 }
@@ -292,8 +298,110 @@ static int stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(u8 primary, u8 secondary)
 	return clks[i];
 }
 
+static struct regmap *pdrm;
+
+static inline void disable_power_domain_write_protection(void)
+{
+	regmap_update_bits(pdrm, 0x00, (1 << 8), (1 << 8));
+}
+
+static inline void enable_power_domain_write_protection(void)
+{
+	regmap_update_bits(pdrm, 0x00, (1 << 8), (0 << 8));
+}
+
+struct stm32_rgate {
+	struct	clk_hw hw;
+	struct	clk_gate gate;
+	u8	bit_rdy_idx;
+};
+
+#define RTC_TIMEOUT 1000000
+
+#define to_rgclk(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct stm32_rgate, hw)
+
+static int rgclk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+	struct stm32_rgate *rgate = to_rgclk(hw);
+	struct clk_hw *gate_hw = &rgate->gate.hw;
+	struct clk_gate *gate = to_clk_gate(gate_hw);
+	u32 reg;
+	int ret;
+
+	__clk_hw_set_clk(gate_hw, hw);
+
+	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
+
+	clk_gate_ops.enable(gate_hw);
+
+	ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(gate->reg, reg,
+			reg & rgate->bit_rdy_idx, 1000, RTC_TIMEOUT);
+
+	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void rgclk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+	clk_gate_ops.disable(hw);
+}
+
+static int rgclk_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+	return clk_gate_ops.is_enabled(hw);
+}
+
+
+static const struct clk_ops rgclk_ops = {
+	.enable = rgclk_enable,
+	.disable = rgclk_disable,
+	.is_enabled = rgclk_is_enabled,
+};
+
+static struct clk_hw *clk_register_rgate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
+		const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags,
+		void __iomem *reg, u8 bit_idx, u8 bit_rdy_idx,
+		u8 clk_gate_flags, spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	struct stm32_rgate *rgate;
+	struct clk_init_data init = { NULL };
+	struct clk_hw *hw;
+	int ret;
+
+	rgate = kzalloc(sizeof(*rgate), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rgate)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+	init.name = name;
+	init.ops = &rgclk_ops;
+	init.flags = flags | CLK_IS_BASIC;
+	init.parent_names = &parent_name;
+	init.num_parents = 1;
+
+	rgate->hw.init = &init;
+	rgate->bit_rdy_idx = bit_rdy_idx;
+
+	rgate->gate.lock = lock;
+	rgate->gate.reg = reg;
+	rgate->gate.bit_idx = bit_idx;
+
+	hw = &rgate->hw;
+	ret = clk_hw_register(dev, hw);
+	if (ret) {
+		kfree(rgate);
+		hw = ERR_PTR(ret);
+	}
+
+	return hw;
+}
+
 static const char *sys_parents[] __initdata =   { "hsi", NULL, "pll" };
 
+const char *rtc_parents[4] = {
+	"no-clock", "lse", "lsi", "hse-rtc"
+};
+
 static const struct clk_div_table ahb_div_table[] = {
 	{ 0x0,   1 }, { 0x1,   1 }, { 0x2,   1 }, { 0x3,   1 },
 	{ 0x4,   1 }, { 0x5,   1 }, { 0x6,   1 }, { 0x7,   1 },
@@ -319,6 +427,12 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	pdrm = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "st,syscfg");
+	if (IS_ERR(pdrm)) {
+		pr_err("%s: Unable to get syscfg\n", __func__);
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
 	hse_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0);
 
 	clk_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy(NULL, "hsi", NULL, 0,
@@ -371,6 +485,22 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
 		}
 	}
 
+	clks[CLK_LSI] = clk_register_rgate(NULL, "lsi", "clk-lsi", 0,
+			base + STM32F4_RCC_CSR, 0, 2, 0, &stm32f4_clk_lock);
+
+	if (IS_ERR(clks[CLK_LSI])) {
+		pr_err("Unable to register lsi clock\n");
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
+	clks[CLK_LSE] = clk_register_rgate(NULL, "lse", "clk-lse", 0,
+			base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR, 0, 2, 0, &stm32f4_clk_lock);
+
+	if (IS_ERR(clks[CLK_LSE])) {
+		pr_err("Unable to register lse clock\n");
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
 	of_clk_add_hw_provider(np, stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk, NULL);
 	return;
 fail:
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks

[Stephen Boyd]

On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org wrote:
> @@ -292,8 +298,110 @@ static int stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(u8 primary, u8 secondary)
>  	return clks[i];
>  }
>  
> +static struct regmap *pdrm;

This can't be part of the stm32_rgate structure?

> +
> +static inline void disable_power_domain_write_protection(void)
> +{
> +	regmap_update_bits(pdrm, 0x00, (1 << 8), (1 << 8));
> +}
> +
> +static inline void enable_power_domain_write_protection(void)
> +{
> +	regmap_update_bits(pdrm, 0x00, (1 << 8), (0 << 8));
> +}
> +
> +struct stm32_rgate {
> +	struct	clk_hw hw;
> +	struct	clk_gate gate;

Why not use the clk_hw inside clk_gate?

> +	u8	bit_rdy_idx;
> +};
> +
> +#define RTC_TIMEOUT 1000000
> +
> +#define to_rgclk(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct stm32_rgate, hw)
> +
> +static int rgclk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	struct stm32_rgate *rgate = to_rgclk(hw);
> +	struct clk_hw *gate_hw = &rgate->gate.hw;
> +	struct clk_gate *gate = to_clk_gate(gate_hw);
> +	u32 reg;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	__clk_hw_set_clk(gate_hw, hw);

Then we don't need this part.

> +
> +	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +
> +	clk_gate_ops.enable(gate_hw);
> +
> +	ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(gate->reg, reg,
> +			reg & rgate->bit_rdy_idx, 1000, RTC_TIMEOUT);
> +
> +	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void rgclk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	clk_gate_ops.disable(hw);
> +}
> +
> +static int rgclk_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	return clk_gate_ops.is_enabled(hw);
> +}
> +
> +

Drop the double newline here please.

> +static const struct clk_ops rgclk_ops = {
> +	.enable = rgclk_enable,
> +	.disable = rgclk_disable,
> +	.is_enabled = rgclk_is_enabled,
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_hw *clk_register_rgate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> +		const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags,
> +		void __iomem *reg, u8 bit_idx, u8 bit_rdy_idx,
> +		u8 clk_gate_flags, spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	struct stm32_rgate *rgate;
> +	struct clk_init_data init = { NULL };
> +	struct clk_hw *hw;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	rgate = kzalloc(sizeof(*rgate), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!rgate)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	init.name = name;
> +	init.ops = &rgclk_ops;
> +	init.flags = flags | CLK_IS_BASIC;

Please no CLK_IS_BASIC flags.

> +	init.parent_names = &parent_name;
> +	init.num_parents = 1;
> +
> +	rgate->hw.init = &init;
> +	rgate->bit_rdy_idx = bit_rdy_idx;
> +
> +	rgate->gate.lock = lock;
> +	rgate->gate.reg = reg;
> +	rgate->gate.bit_idx = bit_idx;
> +
> +	hw = &rgate->hw;
> +	ret = clk_hw_register(dev, hw);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		kfree(rgate);
> +		hw = ERR_PTR(ret);
> +	}
> +
> +	return hw;
> +}
> +
>  static const char *sys_parents[] __initdata =   { "hsi", NULL, "pll" };
>  
> +const char *rtc_parents[4] = {

static const char * const?

> +	"no-clock", "lse", "lsi", "hse-rtc"
> +};
> +
>  static const struct clk_div_table ahb_div_table[] = {
>  	{ 0x0,   1 }, { 0x1,   1 }, { 0x2,   1 }, { 0x3,   1 },
>  	{ 0x4,   1 }, { 0x5,   1 }, { 0x6,   1 }, { 0x7,   1 },
> @@ -319,6 +427,12 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	pdrm = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "st,syscfg");

Is there a dt binding update for this? It should probably be
optional?

> +	if (IS_ERR(pdrm)) {
> +		pr_err("%s: Unable to get syscfg\n", __func__);
> +		goto fail;
> +	}
> +
>  	hse_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0);
>  

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks

[Gabriel Fernandez]

Hi Stephen,
Many thanks for reviewing.

On 10/19/2016 10:24 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
>> @@ -292,8 +298,110 @@ static int stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(u8 primary, u8 secondary)
>>   	return clks[i];
>>   }
>>   
>> +static struct regmap *pdrm;
> This can't be part of the stm32_rgate structure?
yes i can include it.

>
>> +
>> +static inline void disable_power_domain_write_protection(void)
>> +{
>> +	regmap_update_bits(pdrm, 0x00, (1 << 8), (1 << 8));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void enable_power_domain_write_protection(void)
>> +{
>> +	regmap_update_bits(pdrm, 0x00, (1 << 8), (0 << 8));
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct stm32_rgate {
>> +	struct	clk_hw hw;
>> +	struct	clk_gate gate;
> Why not use the clk_hw inside clk_gate?yes you right, if it's optional i won't have dependency with DT
ok
>
>> +	u8	bit_rdy_idx;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define RTC_TIMEOUT 1000000
>> +
>> +#define to_rgclk(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct stm32_rgate, hw)
>> +
>> +static int rgclk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> +	struct stm32_rgate *rgate = to_rgclk(hw);
>> +	struct clk_hw *gate_hw = &rgate->gate.hw;
>> +	struct clk_gate *gate = to_clk_gate(gate_hw);
>> +	u32 reg;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	__clk_hw_set_clk(gate_hw, hw);
> Then we don't need this part.
>
>> +
>> +	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +
>> +	clk_gate_ops.enable(gate_hw);
>> +
>> +	ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(gate->reg, reg,
>> +			reg & rgate->bit_rdy_idx, 1000, RTC_TIMEOUT);
>> +
>> +	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void rgclk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> +	clk_gate_ops.disable(hw);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rgclk_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> +	return clk_gate_ops.is_enabled(hw);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
> Drop the double newline here please.
ok
>
>> +static const struct clk_ops rgclk_ops = {
>> +	.enable = rgclk_enable,
>> +	.disable = rgclk_disable,
>> +	.is_enabled = rgclk_is_enabled,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_hw *clk_register_rgate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>> +		const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags,
>> +		void __iomem *reg, u8 bit_idx, u8 bit_rdy_idx,
>> +		u8 clk_gate_flags, spinlock_t *lock)
>> +{
>> +	struct stm32_rgate *rgate;
>> +	struct clk_init_data init = { NULL };
>> +	struct clk_hw *hw;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	rgate = kzalloc(sizeof(*rgate), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!rgate)
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> +	init.name = name;
>> +	init.ops = &rgclk_ops;
>> +	init.flags = flags | CLK_IS_BASIC;
> Please no CLK_IS_BASIC flags.
ok
>
>> +	init.parent_names = &parent_name;
>> +	init.num_parents = 1;
>> +
>> +	rgate->hw.init = &init;
>> +	rgate->bit_rdy_idx = bit_rdy_idx;
>> +
>> +	rgate->gate.lock = lock;
>> +	rgate->gate.reg = reg;
>> +	rgate->gate.bit_idx = bit_idx;
>> +
>> +	hw = &rgate->hw;
>> +	ret = clk_hw_register(dev, hw);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		kfree(rgate);
>> +		hw = ERR_PTR(ret);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return hw;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static const char *sys_parents[] __initdata =   { "hsi", NULL, "pll" };
>>   
>> +const char *rtc_parents[4] = {
> static const char * const?
ok
>
>> +	"no-clock", "lse", "lsi", "hse-rtc"
>> +};
>> +
>>   static const struct clk_div_table ahb_div_table[] = {
>>   	{ 0x0,   1 }, { 0x1,   1 }, { 0x2,   1 }, { 0x3,   1 },
>>   	{ 0x4,   1 }, { 0x5,   1 }, { 0x6,   1 }, { 0x7,   1 },
>> @@ -319,6 +427,12 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
>>   		return;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	pdrm = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "st,syscfg");
> Is there a dt binding update for this? It should probably be
> optional?
yes you right, if it's optional i don't need dependency with DT

>> +	if (IS_ERR(pdrm)) {
>> +		pr_err("%s: Unable to get syscfg\n", __func__);
>> +		goto fail;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	hse_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0);
>>   

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks

[Gabriel Fernandez]

Hi Stephen,


On 10/19/2016 10:24 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
>> @@ -292,8 +298,110 @@ static int stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(u8 primary, u8 secondary)
>>   	return clks[i];
>>   }
>>   
>> +static struct regmap *pdrm;
> This can't be part of the stm32_rgate structure?
Finally i prefer not, because i need also to disable power domain write 
protection in the patch 4 (clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock).
its will complicate the code.

BR

Gabriel

[PATCH v2 3/6] arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON

[gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o]

From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>

The clock drivers needs to disable the power domain write protection
using syscon/regmap to enable RTC clock.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>
---
 arch/arm/configs/stm32_defconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/stm32_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/stm32_defconfig
index 1e5ec2a..ed1c0881 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/stm32_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/stm32_defconfig
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ CONFIG_SERIAL_STM32=y
 CONFIG_SERIAL_STM32_CONSOLE=y
 # CONFIG_HW_RANDOM is not set
 # CONFIG_HWMON is not set
+CONFIG_MFD_SYSCON=y
 # CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT is not set
 CONFIG_NEW_LEDS=y
 CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS=y
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 4/6] clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock

[gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o]

From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>

This patch introduces the support of the RTC clock.
RTC clock can have 3 sources: lsi, lse and hse_rtc.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 134 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
index 789a8f77..bf9448d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ struct stm32f4_gate_data {
 	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 26,	"ltdc",		"apb2_div" },
 };
 
-enum { SYSTICK, FCLK, CLK_LSI, CLK_LSE, END_PRIMARY_CLK };
+enum { SYSTICK, FCLK, CLK_LSI, CLK_LSE, CLK_HSE_RTC, CLK_RTC, END_PRIMARY_CLK };
 /*
  * MAX_CLKS is the maximum value in the enumeration below plus the combined
  * hweight of stm32f42xx_gate_map (plus one).
@@ -310,6 +310,15 @@ static inline void enable_power_domain_write_protection(void)
 	regmap_update_bits(pdrm, 0x00, (1 << 8), (0 << 8));
 }
 
+static inline void sofware_reset_backup_domain(void)
+{
+	unsigned long val;
+
+	val = readl(base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);
+	writel(val |= (1 << 16), base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);
+	writel(val & ~(1 << 16), base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);
+}
+
 struct stm32_rgate {
 	struct	clk_hw hw;
 	struct	clk_gate gate;
@@ -396,6 +405,113 @@ static struct clk_hw *clk_register_rgate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
 	return hw;
 }
 
+static int cclk_gate_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
+
+	ret = clk_gate_ops.enable(hw);
+
+	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void cclk_gate_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
+
+	clk_gate_ops.disable(hw);
+
+	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
+}
+
+static int cclk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+	return clk_gate_ops.is_enabled(hw);
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops cclk_gate_ops = {
+	.enable		= cclk_gate_enable,
+	.disable	= cclk_gate_disable,
+	.is_enabled	= cclk_gate_is_enabled,
+};
+
+static u8 cclk_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+	return clk_mux_ops.get_parent(hw);
+}
+
+
+static int cclk_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
+
+	sofware_reset_backup_domain();
+
+	ret = clk_mux_ops.set_parent(hw, index);
+
+	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+
+static const struct clk_ops cclk_mux_ops = {
+	.get_parent = cclk_mux_get_parent,
+	.set_parent = cclk_mux_set_parent,
+};
+
+static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct device *dev, const char *name,
+		const char * const *parent_names, int num_parents,
+		void __iomem *reg, u8 bit_idx, u8 shift, unsigned long flags,
+		spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	struct clk_hw *hw;
+	struct clk_gate *gate;
+	struct clk_mux *mux;
+
+	gate = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_gate), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!gate) {
+		hw = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
+	mux = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_mux), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!mux) {
+		kfree(gate);
+		hw = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
+	gate->reg = reg;
+	gate->bit_idx = bit_idx;
+	gate->flags = 0;
+	gate->lock = lock;
+
+	mux->reg = reg;
+	mux->shift = shift;
+	mux->mask = 3;
+	mux->flags = 0;
+
+	hw = clk_hw_register_composite(dev, name, parent_names, num_parents,
+			&mux->hw, &cclk_mux_ops,
+			NULL, NULL,
+			&gate->hw, &cclk_gate_ops,
+			flags);
+
+	if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
+		kfree(gate);
+		kfree(mux);
+	}
+
+fail:
+	return hw;
+}
+
 static const char *sys_parents[] __initdata =   { "hsi", NULL, "pll" };
 
 const char *rtc_parents[4] = {
@@ -501,6 +617,23 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
 		goto fail;
 	}
 
+	clks[CLK_HSE_RTC] = clk_hw_register_divider(NULL, "hse-rtc", "clk-hse",
+			0, base + STM32F4_RCC_CFGR, 16, 5, 0,
+			&stm32f4_clk_lock);
+
+	if (IS_ERR(clks[CLK_HSE_RTC])) {
+		pr_err("Unable to register hse-rtc clock\n");
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
+	clks[CLK_RTC] = stm32_register_cclk(NULL, "rtc", rtc_parents, 4,
+			base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR, 15, 8, 0, &stm32f4_clk_lock);
+
+	if (IS_ERR(clks[CLK_RTC])) {
+		pr_err("Unable to register rtc clock\n");
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
 	of_clk_add_hw_provider(np, stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk, NULL);
 	return;
 fail:
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock

[Stephen Boyd]

On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
> @@ -310,6 +310,15 @@ static inline void enable_power_domain_write_protection(void)
>  	regmap_update_bits(pdrm, 0x00, (1 << 8), (0 << 8));
>  }
>  
> +static inline void sofware_reset_backup_domain(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long val;
> +
> +	val = readl(base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);
> +	writel(val |= (1 << 16), base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);

Interesting C style here! Why set the bit in val that will then
be cleared in the next function call? Please just don't do it. It
would be better to do writel(val | BIT(16), ...)

> +	writel(val & ~(1 << 16), base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);
> +}
> +
>  struct stm32_rgate {
>  	struct	clk_hw hw;
>  	struct	clk_gate gate;
> @@ -396,6 +405,113 @@ static struct clk_hw *clk_register_rgate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  	return hw;
>  }
>  
> +static int cclk_gate_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +
> +	ret = clk_gate_ops.enable(hw);
> +
> +	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void cclk_gate_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +
> +	clk_gate_ops.disable(hw);
> +
> +	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +}
> +
> +static int cclk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	return clk_gate_ops.is_enabled(hw);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops cclk_gate_ops = {
> +	.enable		= cclk_gate_enable,
> +	.disable	= cclk_gate_disable,
> +	.is_enabled	= cclk_gate_is_enabled,
> +};
> +
> +static u8 cclk_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	return clk_mux_ops.get_parent(hw);
> +}
> +
> +

Weird double newline here. Please remove one.

> +static int cclk_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +
> +	sofware_reset_backup_domain();
> +
> +	ret = clk_mux_ops.set_parent(hw, index);
> +
> +	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +

Same.

> +static const struct clk_ops cclk_mux_ops = {
> +	.get_parent = cclk_mux_get_parent,
> +	.set_parent = cclk_mux_set_parent,
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> +		const char * const *parent_names, int num_parents,
> +		void __iomem *reg, u8 bit_idx, u8 shift, unsigned long flags,
> +		spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	struct clk_hw *hw;
> +	struct clk_gate *gate;
> +	struct clk_mux *mux;
> +
> +	gate = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_gate), GFP_KERNEL);

sizeof(*gate) please.

> +	if (!gate) {
> +		hw = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +		goto fail;
> +	}
> +
> +	mux = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_mux), GFP_KERNEL);

sizeof(*mux) please.

> +	if (!mux) {
> +		kfree(gate);
> +		hw = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +		goto fail;
> +	}
> +

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock

[Gabriel Fernandez]

Hi Stephen,

Thanks for reviewing.

Ok for all yours remarks


On 10/19/2016 10:45 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
>> @@ -310,6 +310,15 @@ static inline void enable_power_domain_write_protection(void)
>>   	regmap_update_bits(pdrm, 0x00, (1 << 8), (0 << 8));
>>   }
>>   
>> +static inline void sofware_reset_backup_domain(void)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long val;
>> +
>> +	val = readl(base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);
>> +	writel(val |= (1 << 16), base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);
> Interesting C style here! Why set the bit in val that will then
> be cleared in the next function call? Please just don't do it. It
> would be better to do writel(val | BIT(16), ...)
>
>> +	writel(val & ~(1 << 16), base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);
>> +}
>> +
>>   struct stm32_rgate {
>>   	struct	clk_hw hw;
>>   	struct	clk_gate gate;
>> @@ -396,6 +405,113 @@ static struct clk_hw *clk_register_rgate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>>   	return hw;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int cclk_gate_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +
>> +	ret = clk_gate_ops.enable(hw);
>> +
>> +	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void cclk_gate_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> +	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +
>> +	clk_gate_ops.disable(hw);
>> +
>> +	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int cclk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> +	return clk_gate_ops.is_enabled(hw);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct clk_ops cclk_gate_ops = {
>> +	.enable		= cclk_gate_enable,
>> +	.disable	= cclk_gate_disable,
>> +	.is_enabled	= cclk_gate_is_enabled,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static u8 cclk_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> +	return clk_mux_ops.get_parent(hw);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
> Weird double newline here. Please remove one.
>
>> +static int cclk_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +
>> +	sofware_reset_backup_domain();
>> +
>> +	ret = clk_mux_ops.set_parent(hw, index);
>> +
>> +	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
> Same.
>
>> +static const struct clk_ops cclk_mux_ops = {
>> +	.get_parent = cclk_mux_get_parent,
>> +	.set_parent = cclk_mux_set_parent,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>> +		const char * const *parent_names, int num_parents,
>> +		void __iomem *reg, u8 bit_idx, u8 shift, unsigned long flags,
>> +		spinlock_t *lock)
>> +{
>> +	struct clk_hw *hw;
>> +	struct clk_gate *gate;
>> +	struct clk_mux *mux;
>> +
>> +	gate = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_gate), GFP_KERNEL);
> sizeof(*gate) please.
>
>> +	if (!gate) {
>> +		hw = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +		goto fail;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	mux = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_mux), GFP_KERNEL);
> sizeof(*mux) please.
>
>> +	if (!mux) {
>> +		kfree(gate);
>> +		hw = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +		goto fail;
>> +	}
>> +

Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock

[Gabriel Fernandez]

Hi Stephen,


On 10/19/2016 10:45 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org wrote:
>> @@ -310,6 +310,15 @@ static inline void enable_power_domain_write_protection(void)
>>   	regmap_update_bits(pdrm, 0x00, (1 << 8), (0 << 8));
>>   }
>>   
>> +static inline void sofware_reset_backup_domain(void)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long val;
>> +
>> +	val = readl(base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);
>> +	writel(val |= (1 << 16), base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);
> Interesting C style here! Why set the bit in val that will then
> be cleared in the next function call? Please just don't do it. It
> would be better to do writel(val | BIT(16), ...)
To reset the backup domain, i have to generate a pulse on this bit.

BR
Gabriel.

>
>> +	writel(val & ~(1 << 16), base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);
>> +}
>> +
>>   struct stm32_rgate {
>>   	struct	clk_hw hw;
>>   	struct	clk_gate gate;
>> @@ -396,6 +405,113 @@ static struct clk_hw *clk_register_rgate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>>   	return hw;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int cclk_gate_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +
>> +	ret = clk_gate_ops.enable(hw);
>> +
>> +	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void cclk_gate_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> +	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +
>> +	clk_gate_ops.disable(hw);
>> +
>> +	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int cclk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> +	return clk_gate_ops.is_enabled(hw);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct clk_ops cclk_gate_ops = {
>> +	.enable		= cclk_gate_enable,
>> +	.disable	= cclk_gate_disable,
>> +	.is_enabled	= cclk_gate_is_enabled,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static u8 cclk_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> +	return clk_mux_ops.get_parent(hw);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
> Weird double newline here. Please remove one.
>
>> +static int cclk_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	disable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +
>> +	sofware_reset_backup_domain();
>> +
>> +	ret = clk_mux_ops.set_parent(hw, index);
>> +
>> +	enable_power_domain_write_protection();
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
> Same.
>
>> +static const struct clk_ops cclk_mux_ops = {
>> +	.get_parent = cclk_mux_get_parent,
>> +	.set_parent = cclk_mux_set_parent,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>> +		const char * const *parent_names, int num_parents,
>> +		void __iomem *reg, u8 bit_idx, u8 shift, unsigned long flags,
>> +		spinlock_t *lock)
>> +{
>> +	struct clk_hw *hw;
>> +	struct clk_gate *gate;
>> +	struct clk_mux *mux;
>> +
>> +	gate = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_gate), GFP_KERNEL);
> sizeof(*gate) please.
>
>> +	if (!gate) {
>> +		hw = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +		goto fail;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	mux = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_mux), GFP_KERNEL);
> sizeof(*mux) please.
>
>> +	if (!mux) {
>> +		kfree(gate);
>> +		hw = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +		goto fail;
>> +	}
>> +

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 2/6] ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks

[gabriel.fernandez]

From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>

This patch adds lsi / lse oscillators. These clocks can be use by
RTC clocks.
The clock drivers needs to disable the power domain write protection using
syscon / regmap to enable these clocks.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
index 336ee4f..2700449 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
@@ -56,6 +56,18 @@
 			compatible = "fixed-clock";
 			clock-frequency = <0>;
 		};
+
+		clk-lse {
+			#clock-cells = <0>;
+			compatible = "fixed-clock";
+			clock-frequency = <32768>;
+		};
+
+		clk-lsi {
+			#clock-cells = <0>;
+			compatible = "fixed-clock";
+			clock-frequency = <32000>;
+		};
 	};
 
 	soc {
@@ -185,6 +197,11 @@
 			interrupts = <1>, <2>, <3>, <6>, <7>, <8>, <9>, <10>, <23>, <40>, <41>, <42>, <62>, <76>;
 		};
 
+		pwrcfg: power-config@40007000 {
+			compatible = "syscon";
+			reg = <0x40007000 0x400>;
+		};
+
 		pin-controller {
 			#address-cells = <1>;
 			#size-cells = <1>;
@@ -340,6 +357,7 @@
 			compatible = "st,stm32f42xx-rcc", "st,stm32-rcc";
 			reg = <0x40023800 0x400>;
 			clocks = <&clk_hse>;
+			st,syscfg = <&pwrcfg>;
 		};
 
 		dma1: dma-controller@40026000 {
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH v2 5/6] clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock

[gabriel.fernandez]

From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>

This patch adds the QSPI clock for stm32f469 discovery board.
The gate mapping is a little bit different from stm32f429 soc.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32-rcc.txt     |   4 +-
 drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c                          | 173 ++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32-rcc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32-rcc.txt
index c209de6..0532d81 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32-rcc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32-rcc.txt
@@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ Please refer to clock-bindings.txt for common clock controller binding usage.
 Please also refer to reset.txt for common reset controller binding usage.
 
 Required properties:
-- compatible: Should be "st,stm32f42xx-rcc"
+- compatible: Should be:
+  "st,stm32f42xx-rcc"
+  "st,stm32f469-rcc"
 - reg: should be register base and length as documented in the
   datasheet
 - #reset-cells: 1, see below
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
index bf9448d..8544214 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct stm32f4_gate_data {
 	unsigned long flags;
 };
 
-static const struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f4_gates[] __initconst = {
+static const struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f429_gates[] __initconst = {
 	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR,  0,	"gpioa",	"ahb_div" },
 	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR,  1,	"gpiob",	"ahb_div" },
 	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR,  2,	"gpioc",	"ahb_div" },
@@ -126,23 +126,109 @@ struct stm32f4_gate_data {
 	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 26,	"ltdc",		"apb2_div" },
 };
 
+static const struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f469_gates[] __initconst = {
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR,  0,	"gpioa",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR,  1,	"gpiob",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR,  2,	"gpioc",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR,  3,	"gpiod",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR,  4,	"gpioe",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR,  5,	"gpiof",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR,  6,	"gpiog",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR,  7,	"gpioh",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR,  8,	"gpioi",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR,  9,	"gpioj",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR, 10,	"gpiok",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR, 12,	"crc",		"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR, 18,	"bkpsra",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR, 20,	"ccmdatam",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR, 21,	"dma1",		"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR, 22,	"dma2",		"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR, 23,	"dma2d",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR, 25,	"ethmac",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR, 26,	"ethmactx",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR, 27,	"ethmacrx",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR, 28,	"ethmacptp",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR, 29,	"otghs",	"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR, 30,	"otghsulpi",	"ahb_div" },
+
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB2ENR,  0,	"dcmi",		"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB2ENR,  4,	"cryp",		"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB2ENR,  5,	"hash",		"ahb_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB2ENR,  6,	"rng",		"pll48" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB2ENR,  7,	"otgfs",	"pll48" },
+
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB3ENR,  0,	"fmc",		"ahb_div",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_AHB3ENR,  1,	"qspi",		"ahb_div",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED },
+
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR,  0,	"tim2",		"apb1_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR,  1,	"tim3",		"apb1_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR,  2,	"tim4",		"apb1_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR,  3,	"tim5",		"apb1_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR,  4,	"tim6",		"apb1_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR,  5,	"tim7",		"apb1_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR,  6,	"tim12",	"apb1_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR,  7,	"tim13",	"apb1_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR,  8,	"tim14",	"apb1_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 11,	"wwdg",		"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 14,	"spi2",		"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 15,	"spi3",		"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 17,	"uart2",	"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 18,	"uart3",	"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 19,	"uart4",	"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 20,	"uart5",	"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 21,	"i2c1",		"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 22,	"i2c2",		"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 23,	"i2c3",		"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 25,	"can1",		"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 26,	"can2",		"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 28,	"pwr",		"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 29,	"dac",		"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 30,	"uart7",	"apb1_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB1ENR, 31,	"uart8",	"apb1_div" },
+
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR,  0,	"tim1",		"apb2_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR,  1,	"tim8",		"apb2_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR,  4,	"usart1",	"apb2_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR,  5,	"usart6",	"apb2_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR,  8,	"adc1",		"apb2_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR,  9,	"adc2",		"apb2_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 10,	"adc3",		"apb2_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 11,	"sdio",		"pll48" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 12,	"spi1",		"apb2_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 13,	"spi4",		"apb2_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 14,	"syscfg",	"apb2_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 16,	"tim9",		"apb2_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 17,	"tim10",	"apb2_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 18,	"tim11",	"apb2_mul" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 20,	"spi5",		"apb2_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 21,	"spi6",		"apb2_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 22,	"sai1",		"apb2_div" },
+	{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 26,	"ltdc",		"apb2_div" },
+};
+
 enum { SYSTICK, FCLK, CLK_LSI, CLK_LSE, CLK_HSE_RTC, CLK_RTC, END_PRIMARY_CLK };
-/*
- * MAX_CLKS is the maximum value in the enumeration below plus the combined
- * hweight of stm32f42xx_gate_map (plus one).
- */
-#define MAX_CLKS (71 + END_PRIMARY_CLK + 1)
 
 
 /*
  * This bitmask tells us which bit offsets (0..192) on STM32F4[23]xxx
  * have gate bits associated with them. Its combined hweight is 71.
  */
-static const u64 stm32f42xx_gate_map[] = { 0x000000f17ef417ffull,
-					   0x0000000000000001ull,
-					   0x04777f33f6fec9ffull };
+#define MAX_GATE_MAP 3
+
+static const u64 stm32f42xx_gate_map[MAX_GATE_MAP] = { 0x000000f17ef417ffull,
+						       0x0000000000000001ull,
+						       0x04777f33f6fec9ffull };
+
+static const u64 stm32f46xx_gate_map[MAX_GATE_MAP] = { 0x000000f17ef417ffull,
+						       0x0000000000000003ull,
+						       0x0c777f33f6fec9ffull };
+
+const u64 *stm32f4_gate_map;
+
+static struct clk_hw **clks;
 
-static struct clk_hw *clks[MAX_CLKS];
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(stm32f4_clk_lock);
 static void __iomem *base;
 
@@ -262,7 +348,7 @@ static void stm32f4_rcc_register_pll(const char *hse_clk, const char *hsi_clk)
  */
 static int stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(u8 primary, u8 secondary)
 {
-	u64 table[ARRAY_SIZE(stm32f42xx_gate_map)];
+	u64 table[MAX_GATE_MAP];
 
 	if (primary == 1) {
 		if (WARN_ON(secondary >= END_PRIMARY_CLK))
@@ -270,7 +356,7 @@ static int stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(u8 primary, u8 secondary)
 		return secondary;
 	}
 
-	memcpy(table, stm32f42xx_gate_map, sizeof(table));
+	memcpy(table, stm32f4_gate_map, sizeof(table));
 
 	/* only bits set in table can be used as indices */
 	if (WARN_ON(secondary >= BITS_PER_BYTE * sizeof(table) ||
@@ -532,10 +618,42 @@ static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct device *dev, const char *name,
 	{ 0 },
 };
 
+struct stm32f4_clk_data {
+	const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gates_data;
+	const u64 *gates_map;
+	int gates_num;
+};
+
+static const struct stm32f4_clk_data stm32f429_clk_data = {
+	.gates_data	= stm32f429_gates,
+	.gates_map	= stm32f42xx_gate_map,
+	.gates_num	= ARRAY_SIZE(stm32f429_gates),
+};
+
+static const struct stm32f4_clk_data stm32f469_clk_data = {
+	.gates_data	= stm32f469_gates,
+	.gates_map	= stm32f46xx_gate_map,
+	.gates_num	= ARRAY_SIZE(stm32f469_gates),
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id stm32f4_of_match[] = {
+	{
+		.compatible = "st,stm32f42xx-rcc",
+		.data = &stm32f429_clk_data
+	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "st,stm32f469-rcc",
+		.data = &stm32f469_clk_data
+	},
+	{}
+};
+
 static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
 {
 	const char *hse_clk;
 	int n;
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
+	const struct stm32f4_clk_data *data;
 
 	base = of_iomap(np, 0);
 	if (!base) {
@@ -549,6 +667,19 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
 		goto fail;
 	}
 
+	match = of_match_node(stm32f4_of_match, np);
+	if (WARN_ON(!match))
+		return;
+
+	data = match->data;
+
+	clks = kmalloc_array(data->gates_num + END_PRIMARY_CLK,
+			sizeof(struct clk_hw *), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!clks)
+		goto fail;
+
+	stm32f4_gate_map = data->gates_map;
+
 	hse_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0);
 
 	clk_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy(NULL, "hsi", NULL, 0,
@@ -581,11 +712,15 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
 	clks[FCLK] = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "fclk", "ahb_div",
 					       0, 1, 1);
 
-	for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(stm32f4_gates); n++) {
-		const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gd = &stm32f4_gates[n];
-		unsigned int secondary =
-		    8 * (gd->offset - STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR) + gd->bit_idx;
-		int idx = stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(0, secondary);
+	for (n = 0; n < data->gates_num; n++) {
+		const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gd;
+		unsigned int secondary;
+		int idx;
+
+		gd = (struct stm32f4_gate_data *) &data->gates_data[n];
+		secondary = 8 * (gd->offset - STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR) +
+			gd->bit_idx;
+		idx = stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(0, secondary);
 
 		if (idx < 0)
 			goto fail;
@@ -637,6 +772,8 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
 	of_clk_add_hw_provider(np, stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk, NULL);
 	return;
 fail:
+	kfree(clks);
 	iounmap(base);
 }
-CLK_OF_DECLARE(stm32f4_rcc, "st,stm32f42xx-rcc", stm32f4_rcc_init);
+CLK_OF_DECLARE(stm32f42xx_rcc, "st,stm32f42xx-rcc", stm32f4_rcc_init);
+CLK_OF_DECLARE(stm32f46xx_rcc, "st,stm32f469-rcc", stm32f4_rcc_init);
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:18:18AM +0200, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
> 
> This patch adds the QSPI clock for stm32f469 discovery board.
> The gate mapping is a little bit different from stm32f429 soc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32-rcc.txt     |   4 +-
>  drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c                          | 173 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock

[Stephen Boyd]

On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
> @@ -532,10 +618,42 @@ static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  	{ 0 },
>  };
>  
> +struct stm32f4_clk_data {
> +	const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gates_data;
> +	const u64 *gates_map;
> +	int gates_num;
> +};
> @@ -549,6 +667,19 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
>  		goto fail;
>  	}
>  
> +	match = of_match_node(stm32f4_of_match, np);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!match))
> +		return;
> +
> +	data = match->data;
> +
> +	clks = kmalloc_array(data->gates_num + END_PRIMARY_CLK,
> +			sizeof(struct clk_hw *), GFP_KERNEL);

sizeof(*clks)?

> +	if (!clks)
> +		goto fail;
> +
> +	stm32f4_gate_map = data->gates_map;
> +
>  	hse_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0);
>  
>  	clk_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy(NULL, "hsi", NULL, 0,
> @@ -581,11 +712,15 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
>  	clks[FCLK] = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "fclk", "ahb_div",
>  					       0, 1, 1);
>  
> -	for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(stm32f4_gates); n++) {
> -		const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gd = &stm32f4_gates[n];
> -		unsigned int secondary =
> -		    8 * (gd->offset - STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR) + gd->bit_idx;
> -		int idx = stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(0, secondary);
> +	for (n = 0; n < data->gates_num; n++) {
> +		const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gd;
> +		unsigned int secondary;
> +		int idx;
> +
> +		gd = (struct stm32f4_gate_data *) &data->gates_data[n];

Why do we cast here? Get rid of const? Perhaps the struct
shouldn't have const on the member instead?

> +		secondary = 8 * (gd->offset - STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR) +
> +			gd->bit_idx;
> +		idx = stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(0, secondary);
>  
>  		if (idx < 0)

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock

[Gabriel Fernandez]

Hi Stephen


On 10/19/2016 10:32 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org wrote:
>> @@ -532,10 +618,42 @@ static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>>   	{ 0 },
>>   };
>>   
>> +struct stm32f4_clk_data {
>> +	const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gates_data;
>> +	const u64 *gates_map;
>> +	int gates_num;
>> +};
>> @@ -549,6 +667,19 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
>>   		goto fail;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	match = of_match_node(stm32f4_of_match, np);
>> +	if (WARN_ON(!match))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	data = match->data;
>> +
>> +	clks = kmalloc_array(data->gates_num + END_PRIMARY_CLK,
>> +			sizeof(struct clk_hw *), GFP_KERNEL);
> sizeof(*clks)?
ok

>
>> +	if (!clks)
>> +		goto fail;
>> +
>> +	stm32f4_gate_map = data->gates_map;
>> +
>>   	hse_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0);
>>   
>>   	clk_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy(NULL, "hsi", NULL, 0,
>> @@ -581,11 +712,15 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
>>   	clks[FCLK] = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "fclk", "ahb_div",
>>   					       0, 1, 1);
>>   
>> -	for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(stm32f4_gates); n++) {
>> -		const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gd = &stm32f4_gates[n];
>> -		unsigned int secondary =
>> -		    8 * (gd->offset - STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR) + gd->bit_idx;
>> -		int idx = stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(0, secondary);
>> +	for (n = 0; n < data->gates_num; n++) {
>> +		const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gd;
>> +		unsigned int secondary;
>> +		int idx;
>> +
>> +		gd = (struct stm32f4_gate_data *) &data->gates_data[n];
> Why do we cast here? Get rid of const? Perhaps the struct
> shouldn't have const on the member instead?
we don't need cast here.

Thank's Stephen

BR
Gabriel
>
>> +		secondary = 8 * (gd->offset - STM32F4_RCC_AHB1ENR) +
>> +			gd->bit_idx;
>> +		idx = stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk_idx(0, secondary);
>>   
>>   		if (idx < 0)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v2 6/6] ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock

[gabriel.fernandez]

From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>

This patch adds the QSPI clock for stm32f469 discovery board.

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
index e911af8..4052023 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
@@ -66,6 +66,10 @@
 	};
 };
 
+&rcc {
+	compatible = "st,stm32f469-rcc", "st,stm32-rcc";
+};
+
 &clk_hse {
 	clock-frequency = <8000000>;
 };
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock

[Alexandre Torgue]

Hi Gabriel,

On 10/14/2016 11:18 AM, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
>
> This patch adds the QSPI clock for stm32f469 discovery board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
> index e911af8..4052023 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
> @@ -66,6 +66,10 @@
>  	};
>  };
>
> +&rcc {
> +	compatible = "st,stm32f469-rcc", "st,stm32-rcc";
> +};
> +

With this patch, stm32f469-disco doesn't boot if clk drivers patch are 
not applied.
Can you please send a new version to keep compatibility with older clk 
driver.

&rcc {
 > +	compatible = "st,stm32f469-rcc", "st,stm32-rcc";
-> compatible = "st,stm32f469-rcc", "st,stm32f42xx-rcc", "st,stm32-rcc";
 > +};
 > +
I will take it in next pull request round.


Regards
Alex


>  &clk_hse {
>  	clock-frequency = <8000000>;
>  };
>

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks

[Stephen Boyd]

On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
> 
> Gabriel Fernandez (6):
>   clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks
>   ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks
>   arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON
>   clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock
>   clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock
>   ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock

Can the clk patches be picked without causing problems for
existing dt changes? Do you want an ack from clk maintainers
instead of us picking the clk patches up? The series has
intermingled clk and dts changes so I'm confused.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks

[Gabriel Fernandez]

Hi Stephen,


On 10/19/2016 01:51 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
>> Gabriel Fernandez (6):
>>    clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks
>>    ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks
>>    arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON
>>    clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock
>>    clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock
>>    ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock
> Can the clk patches be picked without causing problems for
> existing dt changes? Do you want an ack from clk maintainers
> instead of us picking the clk patches up? The series has
> intermingled clk and dts changes so I'm confused.
>

Thanks for reviewing.

Normally DT patches will be taken by STM32 maintainer, but yes there is 
a dependency between patch 1 & 2, so if you push the patch 1 into 
clk-next tree you have to take also patch 2.

You have to be synchronized with Alexandre Torgue.

Best Regards

Gabriel

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks

[Stephen Boyd]

On 10/19, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> 
> On 10/19/2016 01:51 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org wrote:
> >>Gabriel Fernandez (6):
> >>   clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks
> >>   ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks
> >>   arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON
> >>   clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock
> >>   clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock
> >>   ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock
> >Can the clk patches be picked without causing problems for
> >existing dt changes? Do you want an ack from clk maintainers
> >instead of us picking the clk patches up? The series has
> >intermingled clk and dts changes so I'm confused.
> >
> 
> Thanks for reviewing.
> 
> Normally DT patches will be taken by STM32 maintainer, but yes there
> is a dependency between patch 1 & 2, so if you push the patch 1 into
> clk-next tree you have to take also patch 2.

Let's break the dependency by making the required property
optional or key off a different compatible string. As it stands
right now applying patch 1 will cause things to break until the
second patch lands which is not great.

> 
> You have to be synchronized with Alexandre Torgue.
> 
> 

I'd prefer zero synchronization. Please just send the clk patches
the next time and leave the stuff for arm-soc out of the patch
series. Thanks.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks

[Gabriel Fernandez]

Hi Stephen,


On 10/19/2016 10:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/19, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>>
>> On 10/19/2016 01:51 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
>>>> Gabriel Fernandez (6):
>>>>    clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks
>>>>    ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks
>>>>    arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON
>>>>    clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock
>>>>    clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock
>>>>    ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock
>>> Can the clk patches be picked without causing problems for
>>> existing dt changes? Do you want an ack from clk maintainers
>>> instead of us picking the clk patches up? The series has
>>> intermingled clk and dts changes so I'm confused.
>>>
>> Thanks for reviewing.
>>
>> Normally DT patches will be taken by STM32 maintainer, but yes there
>> is a dependency between patch 1 & 2, so if you push the patch 1 into
>> clk-next tree you have to take also patch 2.
> Let's break the dependency by making the required property
> optional or key off a different compatible string. As it stands
> right now applying patch 1 will cause things to break until the
> second patch lands which is not great.
>
>> You have to be synchronized with Alexandre Torgue.
>>
>>
> I'd prefer zero synchronization. Please just send the clk patches
> the next time and leave the stuff for arm-soc out of the patch
> series. Thanks.
Ok

Many Thanks.

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks

[Alexandre Torgue]

Hi Gabriel,

On 10/14/2016 11:18 AM, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
>
> v2:
>  - rename compatible property "st,stm32f46xx-rcc" into "st,stm32f469-rcc"
>  - cosmetic: remove bad copy/paste
>
> This patch-set introduce RTC and QSPI clocks for STM32F4 socs
> RTC clock has 3 parents clock oscillators (lsi/lse/hse_rtc)
>
> example to use rtc clock:
>
> 		rtc: rtc@40002800 {
> 			compatible = "st,stm32-rtc";
> 			reg = <0x40002800 0x400>;
> 			...
> 			clocks = <&rcc 1 CLK_RTC>;
>
> 			assigned-clocks =  <&rcc 1 CLK_RTC>;
> 			assigned-clock-parents = <&rcc 1 CLK_LSE>;
> 			...
> 		};
>
> Gabriel Fernandez (6):
>   clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks
>   ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks
>   arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON
>   clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock
>   clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock
>   ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock

You sent a V3 without DT patches. Should I take DT patches from this V2 
patchset ?

Regards
Alex


>
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32-rcc.txt     |   4 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi                   |  18 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts              |   4 +
>  arch/arm/configs/stm32_defconfig                   |   1 +
>  drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c                          | 442 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  5 files changed, 447 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks

[Gabriel Fernandez]

Hi Alexandre,


On 11/03/2016 09:52 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Hi Gabriel,
>
> On 10/14/2016 11:18 AM, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
>> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
>>
>> v2:
>>  - rename compatible property "st,stm32f46xx-rcc" into 
>> "st,stm32f469-rcc"
>>  - cosmetic: remove bad copy/paste
>>
>> This patch-set introduce RTC and QSPI clocks for STM32F4 socs
>> RTC clock has 3 parents clock oscillators (lsi/lse/hse_rtc)
>>
>> example to use rtc clock:
>>
>>         rtc: rtc@40002800 {
>>             compatible = "st,stm32-rtc";
>>             reg = <0x40002800 0x400>;
>>             ...
>>             clocks = <&rcc 1 CLK_RTC>;
>>
>>             assigned-clocks =  <&rcc 1 CLK_RTC>;
>>             assigned-clock-parents = <&rcc 1 CLK_LSE>;
>>             ...
>>         };
>>
>> Gabriel Fernandez (6):
>>   clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks
>>   ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks
>>   arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON
>>   clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock
>>   clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock
>>   ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock
>
> You sent a V3 without DT patches. Should I take DT patches from this 
> V2 patchset ?
>
> Regards
> Alex
>
Yes, no problem

Thanks !

BR.

Gabriel
>
>>
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32-rcc.txt     |   4 +-
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi                   |  18 +
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts              |   4 +
>>  arch/arm/configs/stm32_defconfig                   |   1 +
>>  drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c                          | 442 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  5 files changed, 447 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>