From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tiffany Lin Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] vcodec: mediatek: Add Mediatek V4L2 Video Decoder Driver Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:22:08 +0800 Message-ID: <1477279328.10501.10.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1472818800-22558-1-git-send-email-tiffany.lin@mediatek.com> <1472818800-22558-2-git-send-email-tiffany.lin@mediatek.com> <1472818800-22558-3-git-send-email-tiffany.lin@mediatek.com> <1472818800-22558-4-git-send-email-tiffany.lin@mediatek.com> <20161021110104.5733240e@vento.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161021110104.5733240e@vento.lan> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Hans Verkuil , daniel.thompson@linaro.org, Rob Herring , Matthias Brugger , Daniel Kurtz , Pawel Osciak , Eddie Huang , Yingjoe Chen , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, PoChun.Lin@mediatek.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Mauro, On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 11:01 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Fri, 2 Sep 2016 20:19:54 +0800 > Tiffany Lin escreveu: > > > Add v4l2 layer decoder driver for MT8173 > > > > Signed-off-by: Tiffany Lin > > > +int vdec_if_init(struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx, unsigned int fourcc) > > +{ > > + int ret = 0; > > + > > + switch (fourcc) { > > + case V4L2_PIX_FMT_H264: > > + case V4L2_PIX_FMT_VP8: > > + default: > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > Did you ever test this driver? The above code will *always* return > -EINVAL, with will cause vidioc_vdec_s_fmt() to always fail! > > I suspect that what you wanted to do, instead, is: > > switch (fourcc) { > case V4L2_PIX_FMT_H264: > case V4L2_PIX_FMT_VP8: > break; > default: > return -EINVAL; > The original idea here is that vp8 and h264 are added in later patches. If get this patch without later patches, it should return -EINVAL. > Btw, this patch series has also several issues that were pointed by > checkpatch. Please *always* run checkpatch when submitting your work. > > You should take a look at the Kernel documentation about how to > submit patches, at: > https://mchehab.fedorapeople.org/kernel_docs/process/index.html > > PS.: this time, I fixed the checkpatch issues for you. So, let me know > if the patch below is OK, and I'll merge it at media upstream, > assuming that the other patches in this series are ok. > I did run checkpatch, but I don't know why these issues missed. probably I run checkpatch for all files not for patches. I will take a look at the documentation and keep this in mind for future upstream. Appreciated for your help. best regards, Tiffany