From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Update device tree Synopsys DW DMAC documentation Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:08:24 +0200 Message-ID: <1479319704.22212.0.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1479304615-11360-1-git-send-email-Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com> <1479304615-11360-5-git-send-email-Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com> <1479309042.24056.40.camel@linux.intel.com> <1479315682.2534.20.camel@synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1479315682.2534.20.camel@synopsys.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Eugeniy Paltsev Cc: "vinod.koul@intel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 17:01 +0000, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 17:10 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Overall, since we are going to expose some properties to the Device > > Tree > > I would really think twice about naming. Better if we reuse > > something > > existing already. > > > > So, what I can see is > > > > dmacap,private > > dmacap,memcpy > > > > Here is a selling point as well, i.e. standardization. > > > > As I can see these property name used only in "mv_xor" driver. And  > they are marked as deprecated. > So, I'm not sure if I should used these names. Oh, good catch! So, then I leave this to DT experienced guys to decide. Rob? -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy