[PATCH v4 0/2] da8xx: fix section mismatch in new drivers

[PATCH v4 0/2] da8xx: fix section mismatch in new drivers

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

Sekhar noticed there's a section mismatch in the da8xx-mstpri and
da8xx-ddrctl drivers. This is caused by calling
of_flat_dt_get_machine_name() which has an __init annotation.

This series makes the drivers drop the call and not print the
machine name in the error message.

v1 -> v2:
- drop patch [1/3] from v1
- introduce internal routines in the drivers instead of a general
  function in of/base.c

v2 -> v3:
- use of_property_read_string_index() instead of
  of_property_read_string() to get the first compatible entry
- s/priotities/priorities

v3 -> v4:
- drop the compatible string printing altogether as the new function
  is not safe
- merge the typo fix into patch [1/2]

Bartosz Golaszewski (2):
  bus: da8xx-mstpri: drop the call to of_flat_dt_get_machine_name()
  memory: da8xx-ddrctl: drop the call to of_flat_dt_get_machine_name()

 drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c    | 4 +---
 drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c | 4 +---
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.9.3

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[PATCH v4 1/2] bus: da8xx-mstpri: drop the call to of_flat_dt_get_machine_name()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

In order to avoid a section mismatch drop the call to
of_flat_dt_get_machine_name() when printing the error message.

While we're at it: fix a typo.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c b/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
index 85f0b53..063397f 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
-#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
 
 /*
  * REVISIT: Linux doesn't have a good framework for the kind of performance
@@ -226,8 +225,7 @@ static int da8xx_mstpri_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	prio_list = da8xx_mstpri_get_board_prio();
 	if (!prio_list) {
-		dev_err(dev, "no master priotities defined for board '%s'\n",
-			of_flat_dt_get_machine_name());
+		dev_err(dev, "no master priorities defined for this board\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-- 
2.9.3

[PATCH v4 2/2] memory: da8xx-ddrctl: drop the call to of_flat_dt_get_machine_name()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

In order to avoid a section mismatch drop the call to
of_flat_dt_get_machine_name() when printing the error message.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c b/drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c
index a20e7bb..030afbe 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 
@@ -117,8 +116,7 @@ static int da8xx_ddrctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	setting = da8xx_ddrctl_get_board_settings();
 	if (!setting) {
-		dev_err(dev, "no settings for board '%s'\n",
-			of_flat_dt_get_machine_name());
+		dev_err(dev, "no settings defined for this board\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-- 
2.9.3

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] da8xx: fix section mismatch in new drivers

[Sekhar Nori]

On Wednesday 23 November 2016 07:09 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Sekhar noticed there's a section mismatch in the da8xx-mstpri and
> da8xx-ddrctl drivers. This is caused by calling
> of_flat_dt_get_machine_name() which has an __init annotation.
> 
> This series makes the drivers drop the call and not print the
> machine name in the error message.

Applied both. Thanks!

Regards,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html