From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 15:11:50 +0200 Message-ID: <1480209.xTrtNKOy7N@phil> References: <1400029876-5830-1-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> <6835645.2kTGeWTa9p@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Thomas Abraham , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Lukasz Majewski , Kukjin Kim , Mike Turquette , Tomasz Figa , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-samsung-soc , Thomas P Abraham , Shawn Guo List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2014, 18:35:29 schrieb Viresh Kumar: > On 14 May 2014 18:20, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Could we please come up with a way to probe this from DT in the > > cpufreq-cpu0 driver itself, so we don't have to add a device in every > > platform using it? > Its followed that way because DT Maintainers had strong objections > to creating virtual device nodes and haven't allowed creation of nodes > for cpufreq drivers.. For which there is no physical device, as CPU already > has a separate node.. as we already have the "enable-method" property for enabling/disabling cpus, would something like a "scaling-method" be feasible?