From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
To: thierry.reding@gmail.com
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, vz@mleia.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/3] pwm: lpc32xx: switch driver to one phandle argument for PWM consumers
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 13:20:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488910819.4022.2.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170216202749.20653-1-slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 15:27 -0500, slemieux.tyco@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@tycoint.com>
>
> The change adds private of_xlate() function to process one argument given along with a PWM phandle. LPC32xx SoCs have two independent single channel PWM controllers, the argument is used as a description of PWM output frequency, see previous discussion here:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg534068.html
>
> The changes on actual board dts files are not needed at the moment, because all LPC32xx boards in upstream don't describe any PWM consumers.
>
> Please refer to the following URL to view the previous patch #1 review discussion:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg549772.html
>
Hi Thierry,
can you take this patchset for 4.12?
Let me know if you have more questions.
Regards,
Sylvain
> The "Reviewed-by" and "Acked-by" from the original posting are added into this resend.
>
> Vladimir Zapolskiy (3):
> dt: pwm: lpc32xx: add description of clocks and #pwm-cells properties
> pwm: lpc32xx: switch driver to one phandle argument for PWM consumers
> pwm: lpc32xx: remove handling of PWM channels
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/lpc32xx-pwm.txt | 7 +++++
> drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 36 +++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-07 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-16 20:27 [RESEND PATCH 0/3] pwm: lpc32xx: switch driver to one phandle argument for PWM consumers slemieux.tyco
2017-02-16 20:27 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/3] " slemieux.tyco
[not found] ` <20170216202749.20653-1-slemieux.tyco-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-16 20:27 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/3] dt: pwm: lpc32xx: add description of clocks and #pwm-cells properties slemieux.tyco-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
2017-03-28 17:24 ` Sylvain Lemieux
2017-02-16 20:27 ` [RESEND PATCH 3/3] pwm: lpc32xx: remove handling of PWM channels slemieux.tyco-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
2017-03-07 18:20 ` Sylvain Lemieux [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1488910819.4022.2.camel@gmail.com \
--to=slemieux.tyco@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vz@mleia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).