From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Roy Franz <roy.franz@cavium.com>,
Harb Abdulhamid <harba@codeaurora.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/8] Documentation: add DT binding for ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI) protocol
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:10:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1496851812-19623-2-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1496851812-19623-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
This patch adds devicetree binding for System Control and Management
Interface (SCMI) Message Protocol used between the Application Cores(AP)
and the System Control Processor(SCP). The MHU peripheral provides a
mechanism for inter-processor communication between SCP's M3 processor
and AP.
SCP offers control and management of the core/cluster power states,
various power domain DVFS including the core/cluster, certain system
clocks configuration, thermal sensors and many others.
SCMI protocol is developed as better replacement to the existing SCPI
which is not flexible and easily extensible.
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 193 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d6e4b7eff199
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+System Control and Management Interface (SCMI) Message Protocol
+----------------------------------------------------------
+
+The SCMI is intended to allow agents such as OSPM to manage various functions
+that are provided by the hardware platform it is running on, including power
+and performance functions.
+
+This binding is intended to define the interface the firmware implementing
+the SCMI as described in ARM document number ARM DUI 0922B ("ARM System Control
+and Management Interface Platform Design Document")[0] provide for OSPM in
+the device tree.
+
+Required properties:
+
+- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi"
+- method : The method of calling the SCMI firmware. Only permitted value
+ currently is:
+ "mailbox-doorbell" : When mailbox doorbell is used as a mechanism
+ to alert the presence of a messages and/or
+ notification
+- mboxes: List of phandle and mailbox channel specifiers. It should contain
+ exactly one or two mailboxes, one for transmitting messages("tx")
+ and another optional for receiving the notifications("rx") if
+ supported.
+- mbox-names: shall be "tx" or "rx"
+- shmem : List of phandle pointing to the shared memory(SHM) area between the
+ processors using these mailboxes for IPC, one for each mailbox
+ SHM can be any memory reserved for the purpose of this communication
+ between the processors.
+
+See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mailbox.txt for more details
+about the generic mailbox controller and client driver bindings.
+
+Each protocol supported shall have a sub-node with corresponding compatible
+as described in the following sections. If the platform supports dedicated
+communication channel for a particular protocol, the 3 properties namely:
+mboxes, mbox-names and shmem shall be present in the sub-node corresponding
+to that protocol.
+
+Clock/Performance bindings for the clocks/OPPs based on SCMI Message Protocol
+------------------------------------------------------------
+
+This binding uses the common clock binding[1].
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi-clocks" or "arm,scmi-perf-domains"
+ arm,scmi-clocks:
+ These clocks either provide an entire range of values
+ between the limits or only discrete points each at fixed
+ step size between the limits. The firmware provides
+ mechanism to discover them.
+ arm,scmi-perf-domains:
+ These are OPPs(not just simple clocks), i.e. discrete
+ performance levels that are supported by the platform.
+ Again the firmware provides mechanism to discover the
+ performance and other attributes associated with the
+ levels.
+
+Other required properties for all clocks(all from common clock binding):
+- #clock-cells : Should be 1. Contains the Clock ID value used by SCMI commands.
+- clock-indices: The identifying number for the clocks(i.e.clock_id) in the
+ node. It can be non linear and hence provide the mapping of
+ identifiers.
+
+Power domain bindings for the power domains based on SCMI Message Protocol
+------------------------------------------------------------
+
+This binding uses the generic power domain binding[4].
+
+PM domain providers
+===================
+
+Required properties:
+ - #power-domain-cells : Should be 1. Contains the device or the power
+ domain ID value used by SCMI commands.
+
+PM domain consumers
+===================
+
+Required properties:
+ - power-domains : A phandle and PM domain specifier as defined by bindings of
+ the power controller specified by phandle.
+
+Sensor bindings for the sensors based on SCMI Message Protocol
+--------------------------------------------------------------
+SCMI provides an API to access the various sensors on the SoC.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible : should be "arm,scmi-sensors".
+- #thermal-sensor-cells: should be set to 1. This property follows the
+ thermal device tree bindings[2].
+
+ Valid cell values are raw identifiers (Sensor ID)
+ as used by the firmware. Refer to platform details
+ for your implementation for the IDs to use.
+
+SRAM and Shared Memory for SCMI
+-------------------------------
+
+A small area of SRAM is reserved for SCMI communication between application
+processors and SCP.
+
+The properties should follow the generic mmio-sram description found in [3]
+
+Each sub-node represents the reserved area for SCMI.
+
+Required sub-node properties:
+- reg : The base offset and size of the reserved area with the SRAM
+- compatible : should be "arm,scp-shmem" for Non-secure SRAM based
+ shared memory
+
+[0] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0056a/index.html
+[1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
+[2] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt
+[3] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.txt
+[4] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
+
+Example:
+
+sram: sram@50000000 {
+ compatible = "arm,juno-sram-ns", "mmio-sram";
+ reg = <0x0 0x50000000 0x0 0x10000>;
+
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ ranges = <0 0x0 0x50000000 0x10000>;
+
+ cpu_scp_lpri: scp-shmem@0 {
+ compatible = "arm,juno-scp-shmem";
+ reg = <0x0 0x200>;
+ };
+
+ cpu_scp_hpri: scp-shmem@200 {
+ compatible = "arm,juno-scp-shmem";
+ reg = <0x200 0x200>;
+ };
+};
+
+mailbox: mailbox0@40000000 {
+ ....
+ #mbox-cells = <1>;
+};
+
+scmi_protocol: scmi@2e000000 {
+ compatible = "arm,scmi";
+ mboxes = <&mailbox 0 &mailbox 1>;
+ shmem = <&cpu_scp_lpri &cpu_scp_hpri>;
+
+ scmi_dvfs: clocks@0 {
+ compatible = "arm,scmi-perf-domains";
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ clock-indices = <0>, <1>, <2>;
+ };
+ scmi_clk: clocks@3 {
+ compatible = "arm,scmi-clocks";
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ clock-indices = <3>, <4>;
+ };
+
+ scmi_sensors: sensors {
+ compatible = "arm,scmi-sensors";
+ #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
+ };
+
+ scmi_devpd: power-domains {
+ compatible = "arm,scmi-power-domains";
+ #power-domain-cells = <1>;
+ };
+};
+
+cpu@0 {
+ ...
+ reg = <0 0>;
+ clocks = <&scmi_dvfs 0>;
+};
+
+hdlcd@7ff60000 {
+ ...
+ reg = <0 0x7ff60000 0 0x1000>;
+ clocks = <&scmi_clk 4>;
+ power-domains = <&scmi_devpd 1>;
+};
+
+thermal-zones {
+ soc_thermal {
+ polling-delay-passive = <100>;
+ polling-delay = <1000>;
+
+ /* sensor ID */
+ thermal-sensors = <&scmi_sensors0 3>;
+ ...
+ };
+};
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-07 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-07 16:10 [RFC PATCH 0/8] firmware: ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI) support Sudeep Holla
2017-06-07 16:10 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
[not found] ` <1496851812-19623-2-git-send-email-sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-09 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] Documentation: add DT binding for ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI) protocol Rob Herring
2017-06-09 14:47 ` Sudeep Holla
[not found] ` <8d17f317-510c-b98e-4c42-c4ad2a8f0c63-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-09 15:39 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqJK9Wkr-x2RbgGfqSDfK7b21MQAaWwONfVwQV8eHAm+qg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-09 15:50 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-06-09 18:12 ` Matt Sealey
[not found] ` <CAHCPf3s3MsiQyWFOgNJdD9F2JAwi_BVxVZG69zj+bJLzEw9AiA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-12 17:39 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-06-12 21:13 ` Rob Herring
2017-06-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] firmware: arm_scmi: add basic driver infrastructure for SCMI Sudeep Holla
2017-06-07 19:18 ` Roy Franz
[not found] ` <CAKWsp+xR_1u2zrG=-dSzSktRvrr2Nfp50Hxur_YEFgr6oQ7KZQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-08 9:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-06-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] firmware: arm_scmi: add common infrastructure and support for base protocol Sudeep Holla
[not found] ` <1496851812-19623-4-git-send-email-sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-07 19:19 ` Roy Franz
2017-06-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocol Sudeep Holla
[not found] ` <1496851812-19623-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for clock protocol Sudeep Holla
[not found] ` <1496851812-19623-6-git-send-email-sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-07 19:19 ` Roy Franz
2017-06-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] firmware: arm_scmi: probe and initialise all the supported protocols Sudeep Holla
2017-06-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for power protocol Sudeep Holla
[not found] ` <1496851812-19623-7-git-send-email-sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-07 20:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a3Vw2AvAr4hNd0A6Tih1YNorjiG2jkhcuo=CK1RF+aLFA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-08 9:39 ` Sudeep Holla
[not found] ` <d610d205-aa19-cf2f-072a-8b64c8c8be66-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-08 11:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a2wJ+hWro7+KYUBLRSTdbwKFjuzutajo436F-X=nMD5cQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-08 11:14 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-06-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for sensor protocol Sudeep Holla
2017-06-07 19:19 ` Roy Franz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1496851812-19623-2-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=harba@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=roy.franz@cavium.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).