Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] arm64: Add architecture support for PCI

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>]

On Wednesday 19 March 2014 12:53:11 Rob Herring wrote:
> I've successfully used the preceeding series on ARM converting the
> Versatile PCI support to use it. The main part of the process was just
> copying this arm64 code to arm which tells me the code is in the wrong
> place. There are still some differences in pcibios_fixup_bus, and it
> is not clear to me whether the arm version should be doing all the
> things the arm64 version does and vice-versa. Certainly that should be
> sorted out. The other issues I see is pci_ioremap_io still has to be
> called by the driver and is not aligned at least for the prototype as
> I pointed out. Seems all these issues could be fixed with a simple
> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MMIO_IOSPACE kconfig option.

I don't even think we need a CONFIG option: Any architecture that wants
to provide pci_ioremap_io (or whatever we end up calling the new version)
needs to pass the virtual base address to the common code, and the
easiest way to do that is using a macro  (e.g. PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE).

What I think we should end up with is a generic implementation like

/* 
 * architectures with special needs may provide their own version,
 * but most should be able to use this one.
 */
unsigned long __weak pci_ioremap_iospace(struct resource *bus, unsigned long cpu)
{
#ifdef PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE
	/* find free space, ioremap the bus address, return the offset */
	...
#endif

	/* this architecture doesn't have memory mapped I/O space,
	   so this function should never be called */
	WARN_ON(1);
	return -ENODEV;
}

	Arnd