From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Jeffery Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] gpio: gpiolib: Add core support for maintaining GPIO values on reset Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:30:36 +1030 Message-ID: <1508976036.13477.3.camel@aj.id.au> References: <20171020033727.21557-1-andrew@aj.id.au> <20171020033727.21557-2-andrew@aj.id.au> <1508488347.24322.51.camel@aj.id.au> <20171025081141.uczvbfstmt3jcisw@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-aw/Ol/GUAsa/IMnjh/7q" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171025081141.uczvbfstmt3jcisw@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Charles Keepax Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Michael Welling , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Jonathan Corbet , Joel Stanley , Ryan Chen , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Charles Keepax , Laxman Dewangan , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , patches@opensource.cirrus.com, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , OpenBMC Maillist , linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --=-aw/Ol/GUAsa/IMnjh/7q Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 09:11 +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:02:27PM +1030, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 09:43 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > > > > > GPIO state reset tolerance is implemented in gpiolib through the > > > > > addition of a new pinconf parameter. With that, some renaming of = helpers > > > > > is done to clarify the scope of the already existing > > > > > gpiochip_line_is_persistent(), as it's now ambiguous as to whethe= r that > > > > > means on suspend, reset or both. > > > >=20 > > > > Isn't it most reasonable to say persistance covers both cases, rese= t > > > > and/or sleep? This seems a bit like overdefined. >=20 > Seems reasonable to me to just expand the existing stuff to cover > reset as well, I don't think that should cause any issues for the > Arizona stuff. Great. I addressed this in the non-RFC series. Thanks for the feedback. Andrew --=-aw/Ol/GUAsa/IMnjh/7q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABCgAGBQJZ8SWlAAoJEJ0dnzgO5LT5W4MQAJxWfNFjoqzWSR7SAQqX9XPw Avk/BBnlqsYEtjb3yVJY1gCn2JafP4V9EmiShLaUN0gqVONOxGix7gLRJXVr59N+ dMjbxc83iz7xz+KS2N4wFFJk134zuw0olkpmonMyxcSkLheRm7FODjg1CysYg5ys t67DLyXjq2zs2ikBIO18qnL0gn1wB0l8K9WkEV5St+w1lwlYc6ekgEvF07ERXxvp 65aVjyVXF66dUsP5W0DidxTxxxU1N5h0aRh9uhELXscmCopXo8xqJrksPnLwJaO2 SN2jBeWen+GRJlQA3H+6+32G2vIqXJ4PoRUxL6PhsRBu42j80hpgSA9A3ztVpj1M p485dd7IljFD7V+HGdoDv5rZ2Kx0p+A0IVubxE4NsDZvLYJNHvfqsDP+7Cs/HaLE ZAL+UOpcwWT4A/gqISwpxfpt7r4SJj4e6RSdb3Fc7rWTaZpy7LXQPci0hQS8qXg6 ZRPD3l8ji0Q0r6mGPaU0sIbAYiwm8tp+cJWaBHBslF/Xixd58f5XAI0HDo20+HVR QlUALHwsb7Di0NWV4eXedSk8kuE8m9FxD8kuZsCM5njPag6Dqvi0MGpYPm8IVYVI 9tys6RrSMnMS9QQnub1Jzq1D7Cv4EE84pWVPd6tsl3Y8okeavn/gulYartRSWE90 KWjWDqN9sdBemHBxXyG5 =e34t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-aw/Ol/GUAsa/IMnjh/7q--