[PATCH/RFT 0/3] thermal: add support for r8a77995

[PATCH/RFT 0/3] thermal: add support for r8a77995

[Yoshihiro Kaneko]

This series adds thermal support for r8a77995.
R-Car D3 (r8a77995) have a thermal sensor module which is similar to Gen2.
Therefore this series adds r8a77995 support to rcar_thermal driver not
rcar_gen3_thermal driver.

This series is based on the next branch of Zhang Rui's linux tree.

Yoshihiro Kaneko (3):
  thermal: rcar_thermal: add r8a77995 support
  dt-bindings: thermal: rcar-thermal: add R8A77995 support
  arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77995: add thermal device support

 .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/rcar-thermal.txt   |   1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995.dtsi          |  31 +++++
 drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c                     | 141 ++++++++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH/RFT 1/3] thermal: rcar_thermal: add r8a77995 support

[Yoshihiro Kaneko]

Add support for R-Car D3 (r8a77995) thermal sensor.

Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
index 73e5fee..d517155 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
@@ -69,6 +69,30 @@ struct rcar_thermal_priv {
 	u32 ctemp;
 };
 
+enum rcar_thermal_type {
+	RCAR_THERMAL,
+	RCAR_GEN2_THERMAL,
+	RCAR_GEN3_THERMAL,
+};
+
+struct rcar_thermal_chip {
+	int use_of_thermal;
+	enum rcar_thermal_type type;
+};
+
+static const struct rcar_thermal_chip rcar_thermal = {
+	.use_of_thermal = 0,
+	.type = RCAR_THERMAL,
+};
+static const struct rcar_thermal_chip rcar_gen2_thermal = {
+	.use_of_thermal = 1,
+	.type = RCAR_GEN2_THERMAL,
+};
+static const struct rcar_thermal_chip rcar_gen3_thermal = {
+	.use_of_thermal = 1,
+	.type = RCAR_GEN3_THERMAL,
+};
+
 #define rcar_thermal_for_each_priv(pos, common)	\
 	list_for_each_entry(pos, &common->head, list)
 
@@ -77,13 +101,23 @@ struct rcar_thermal_priv {
 #define rcar_priv_to_dev(priv)		((priv)->common->dev)
 #define rcar_has_irq_support(priv)	((priv)->common->base)
 #define rcar_id_to_shift(priv)		((priv)->id * 8)
-#define rcar_of_data(dev)		((unsigned long)of_device_get_match_data(dev))
-#define rcar_use_of_thermal(dev)	(rcar_of_data(dev) == USE_OF_THERMAL)
+#define rcar_of_data(dev) \
+	((struct rcar_thermal_chip *)of_device_get_match_data(dev))
+#define rcar_use_of_thermal(dev)	(rcar_of_data(dev)->use_of_thermal)
 
-#define USE_OF_THERMAL	1
 static const struct of_device_id rcar_thermal_dt_ids[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "renesas,rcar-thermal", },
-	{ .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen2-thermal", .data = (void *)USE_OF_THERMAL },
+	{
+		.compatible = "renesas,rcar-thermal",
+		.data = (void *)&rcar_thermal,
+	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen2-thermal",
+		 .data = (void *)&rcar_gen2_thermal,
+	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "renesas,thermal-r8a77995",
+		.data = (void *)&rcar_gen3_thermal,
+	},
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rcar_thermal_dt_ids);
@@ -190,7 +224,8 @@ static int rcar_thermal_update_temp(struct rcar_thermal_priv *priv)
 	 * enable IRQ
 	 */
 	if (rcar_has_irq_support(priv)) {
-		rcar_thermal_write(priv, FILONOFF, 0);
+		if (rcar_of_data(dev)->type != RCAR_GEN3_THERMAL)
+			rcar_thermal_write(priv, FILONOFF, 0);
 
 		/* enable Rising/Falling edge interrupt */
 		rcar_thermal_write(priv, POSNEG,  0x1);
@@ -438,6 +473,7 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct rcar_thermal_priv *priv;
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct resource *res, *irq;
+	int nirq = rcar_of_data(dev)->type == RCAR_GEN3_THERMAL ? 2 : 1;
 	int mres = 0;
 	int i;
 	int ret = -ENODEV;
@@ -457,19 +493,35 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
 	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
 
-	irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
-	if (irq) {
-		/*
-		 * platform has IRQ support.
-		 * Then, driver uses common registers
-		 * rcar_has_irq_support() will be enabled
-		 */
-		res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, mres++);
-		common->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
-		if (IS_ERR(common->base))
-			return PTR_ERR(common->base);
+	for (i = 0; i < nirq; i++) {
+		irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
+		if (!irq)
+			continue;
+		if (!common->base) {
+			/*
+			 * platform has IRQ support.
+			 * Then, driver uses common registers
+			 * rcar_has_irq_support() will be enabled
+			 */
+			res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
+						    mres++);
+			common->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+			if (IS_ERR(common->base))
+				return PTR_ERR(common->base);
 
-		idle = 0; /* polling delay is not needed */
+			idle = 0; /* polling delay is not needed */
+		}
+
+		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq->start, rcar_thermal_irq,
+				       IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), common);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "irq request failed\n ");
+			goto error_unregister;
+		}
+
+		/* update ENR bits */
+		if (rcar_of_data(dev)->type == RCAR_GEN3_THERMAL)
+			enr_bits |= 1 << i;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0;; i++) {
@@ -531,20 +583,12 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		list_move_tail(&priv->list, &common->head);
 
 		/* update ENR bits */
-		enr_bits |= 3 << (i * 8);
+		if (rcar_of_data(dev)->type != RCAR_GEN3_THERMAL)
+			enr_bits |= 3 << (i * 8);
 	}
 
-	/* enable temperature comparation */
-	if (irq) {
-		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq->start, rcar_thermal_irq, 0,
-				       dev_name(dev), common);
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(dev, "irq request failed\n ");
-			goto error_unregister;
-		}
-
+	if (enr_bits)
 		rcar_thermal_common_write(common, ENR, enr_bits);
-	}
 
 	dev_info(dev, "%d sensor probed\n", i);
 
@@ -556,9 +600,48 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int rcar_thermal_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct rcar_thermal_common *common = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct rcar_thermal_priv *priv;
+
+	if (rcar_of_data(dev)->type == RCAR_GEN3_THERMAL) {
+		rcar_thermal_common_write(common, ENR, 0);
+		priv = list_first_entry(&common->head, typeof(*priv), list);
+		rcar_thermal_irq_disable(priv);
+		rcar_thermal_bset(priv, THSCR, CPCTL, 0);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rcar_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct rcar_thermal_common *common = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct rcar_thermal_priv *priv;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (rcar_of_data(dev)->type == RCAR_GEN3_THERMAL) {
+		priv = list_first_entry(&common->head, typeof(*priv), list);
+		ret = rcar_thermal_update_temp(priv);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+		rcar_thermal_irq_enable(priv);
+		rcar_thermal_common_write(common, ENR, 0x03);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(rcar_thermal_pm_ops, rcar_thermal_suspend,
+			 rcar_thermal_resume);
+
 static struct platform_driver rcar_thermal_driver = {
 	.driver	= {
 		.name	= "rcar_thermal",
+		.pm = &rcar_thermal_pm_ops,
 		.of_match_table = rcar_thermal_dt_ids,
 	},
 	.probe		= rcar_thermal_probe,
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH/RFT 1/3] thermal: rcar_thermal: add r8a77995 support

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi  Kaneko-san,

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com> wrote:
> Add support for R-Car D3 (r8a77995) thermal sensor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c

> @@ -77,13 +101,23 @@ struct rcar_thermal_priv {
>  #define rcar_priv_to_dev(priv)         ((priv)->common->dev)
>  #define rcar_has_irq_support(priv)     ((priv)->common->base)
>  #define rcar_id_to_shift(priv)         ((priv)->id * 8)
> -#define rcar_of_data(dev)              ((unsigned long)of_device_get_match_data(dev))
> -#define rcar_use_of_thermal(dev)       (rcar_of_data(dev) == USE_OF_THERMAL)
> +#define rcar_of_data(dev) \
> +       ((struct rcar_thermal_chip *)of_device_get_match_data(dev))

I think it would be better to get rid of this macro, as
of_device_get_match_data()
walks the rcar_thermal_dt_ids[] over and over again.

Instead, you can store a pointer to struct rcar_thermal_chip in struct
rcar_thermal_priv in rcar_thermal_probe().

> +#define rcar_use_of_thermal(dev)       (rcar_of_data(dev)->use_of_thermal)
> -#define USE_OF_THERMAL 1
>  static const struct of_device_id rcar_thermal_dt_ids[] = {
> -       { .compatible = "renesas,rcar-thermal", },
> -       { .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen2-thermal", .data = (void *)USE_OF_THERMAL },
> +       {
> +               .compatible = "renesas,rcar-thermal",
> +               .data = (void *)&rcar_thermal,

This cast not needed.

> @@ -438,6 +473,7 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         struct rcar_thermal_priv *priv;
>         struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>         struct resource *res, *irq;
> +       int nirq = rcar_of_data(dev)->type == RCAR_GEN3_THERMAL ? 2 : 1;

Why 2? Your DT patch has 3 interrupts, which matches the datasheet.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [PATCH/RFT 1/3] thermal: rcar_thermal: add r8a77995 support

[Yoshihiro Kaneko]

Hi Geert-san,

Thanks for your review.

2018-03-12 20:02 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>:
> Hi  Kaneko-san,
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Add support for R-Car D3 (r8a77995) thermal sensor.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rcar_thermal.c
>
>> @@ -77,13 +101,23 @@ struct rcar_thermal_priv {
>>  #define rcar_priv_to_dev(priv)         ((priv)->common->dev)
>>  #define rcar_has_irq_support(priv)     ((priv)->common->base)
>>  #define rcar_id_to_shift(priv)         ((priv)->id * 8)
>> -#define rcar_of_data(dev)              ((unsigned long)of_device_get_match_data(dev))
>> -#define rcar_use_of_thermal(dev)       (rcar_of_data(dev) == USE_OF_THERMAL)
>> +#define rcar_of_data(dev) \
>> +       ((struct rcar_thermal_chip *)of_device_get_match_data(dev))
>
> I think it would be better to get rid of this macro, as
> of_device_get_match_data()
> walks the rcar_thermal_dt_ids[] over and over again.
>
> Instead, you can store a pointer to struct rcar_thermal_chip in struct
> rcar_thermal_priv in rcar_thermal_probe().

I understand.
I will work on this improvement.

>
>> +#define rcar_use_of_thermal(dev)       (rcar_of_data(dev)->use_of_thermal)
>> -#define USE_OF_THERMAL 1
>>  static const struct of_device_id rcar_thermal_dt_ids[] = {
>> -       { .compatible = "renesas,rcar-thermal", },
>> -       { .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen2-thermal", .data = (void *)USE_OF_THERMAL },
>> +       {
>> +               .compatible = "renesas,rcar-thermal",
>> +               .data = (void *)&rcar_thermal,
>
> This cast not needed.

Yes.

>
>> @@ -438,6 +473,7 @@ static int rcar_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         struct rcar_thermal_priv *priv;
>>         struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>         struct resource *res, *irq;
>> +       int nirq = rcar_of_data(dev)->type == RCAR_GEN3_THERMAL ? 2 : 1;
>
> Why 2? Your DT patch has 3 interrupts, which matches the datasheet.

This driver uses INTDT0 and INTDT1. INTDT2 is not used.


Thanks,
Kaneko

>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds

[PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: thermal: rcar-thermal: add R8A77995 support

[Yoshihiro Kaneko]

Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rcar-thermal.txt | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rcar-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rcar-thermal.txt
index 349e635..b2829cb 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rcar-thermal.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rcar-thermal.txt
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Required properties:
 			    - "renesas,thermal-r8a7791" (R-Car M2-W)
 			    - "renesas,thermal-r8a7792" (R-Car V2H)
 			    - "renesas,thermal-r8a7793" (R-Car M2-N)
+			    - "renesas,thermal-r8a77995" (R-Car D3)
 - reg			: Address range of the thermal registers.
 			  The 1st reg will be recognized as common register
 			  if it has "interrupts".
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: thermal: rcar-thermal: add R8A77995 support

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Kaneko-san,

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rcar-thermal.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rcar-thermal.txt
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Required properties:
>                             - "renesas,thermal-r8a7791" (R-Car M2-W)
>                             - "renesas,thermal-r8a7792" (R-Car V2H)
>                             - "renesas,thermal-r8a7793" (R-Car M2-N)
> +                           - "renesas,thermal-r8a77995" (R-Car D3)

OK for this change.

I think the paragraph above needs some clarification, too:

    Required properties:
    - compatible            : "renesas,thermal-<soctype>",
                               "renesas,rcar-gen2-thermal" (with
thermal-zone) or
                               "renesas,rcar-thermal" (without
thermal-zone) as fallback.

Your DT update for D3 contains the thermal-zone, but it is not R-Car Gen2,
while you declare it compatible with "renesas,rcar-thermal".

Probably we can just drop the fallback for D3 (and V3M later)?

And the paragraph about interrupts need an update, too, as D3 has more
than one interrupt:

    Option properties:
    - interrupts            : use interrupt

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: thermal: rcar-thermal: add R8A77995 support

[Yoshihiro Kaneko]

Hi Geert-san,

Thank you for your review!

2018-03-12 19:13 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>:
> Hi Kaneko-san,
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rcar-thermal.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rcar-thermal.txt
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Required properties:
>>                             - "renesas,thermal-r8a7791" (R-Car M2-W)
>>                             - "renesas,thermal-r8a7792" (R-Car V2H)
>>                             - "renesas,thermal-r8a7793" (R-Car M2-N)
>> +                           - "renesas,thermal-r8a77995" (R-Car D3)
>
> OK for this change.
>
> I think the paragraph above needs some clarification, too:
>
>     Required properties:
>     - compatible            : "renesas,thermal-<soctype>",
>                                "renesas,rcar-gen2-thermal" (with
> thermal-zone) or
>                                "renesas,rcar-thermal" (without
> thermal-zone) as fallback.
>
> Your DT update for D3 contains the thermal-zone, but it is not R-Car Gen2,
> while you declare it compatible with "renesas,rcar-thermal".
>
> Probably we can just drop the fallback for D3 (and V3M later)?

It sounds good.
I will update DT to drop the fallback for D3.

>
> And the paragraph about interrupts need an update, too, as D3 has more
> than one interrupt:
>
>     Option properties:
>     - interrupts            : use interrupt

I will update this paragraph.


Thanks,
Kaneko

>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds

[PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77995: add thermal device support

[Yoshihiro Kaneko]

Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995.dtsi | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995.dtsi
index 788e3af..d1a5197 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995.dtsi
@@ -402,5 +402,36 @@
 			#phy-cells = <0>;
 			status = "disabled";
 		};
+
+		thermal: thermal@e61f0000 {
+			compatible = "renesas,thermal-r8a77995",
+				     "renesas,rcar-thermal";
+			reg = <0 0xe61f0000 0 0x10>, <0 0xe61f0100 0 0x38>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 67 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 68 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 69 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 522>;
+			power-domains = <&sysc R8A77995_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
+			resets = <&cpg 522>;
+			#thermal-sensor-cells = <0>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	thermal-zones {
+		cpu_thermal: cpu-thermal {
+			polling-delay-passive = <250>;
+			polling-delay = <1000>;
+			thermal-sensors = <&thermal>;
+
+			trips {
+				cpu-crit {
+					temperature = <120000>;
+					hysteresis = <2000>;
+					type = "critical";
+				};
+			};
+			cooling-maps {
+			};
+		};
 	};
 };
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77995: add thermal device support

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Kaneko-san,

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995.dtsi
> @@ -402,5 +402,36 @@
>                         #phy-cells = <0>;
>                         status = "disabled";
>                 };
> +
> +               thermal: thermal@e61f0000 {

According to the Hard User Manual rev. 0.80, the base address is e6190000?

> +                       compatible = "renesas,thermal-r8a77995",
> +                                    "renesas,rcar-thermal";

I would drop the fallback property, cfr. my comments on the DT binding
patch.

> +                       reg = <0 0xe61f0000 0 0x10>, <0 0xe61f0100 0 0x38>;

0xe619... (twice)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77995: add thermal device support

[Yoshihiro Kaneko]

Hi Geert-san,

Thanks for your review.

2018-03-12 19:56 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>:
> Hi Kaneko-san,
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995.dtsi
>> @@ -402,5 +402,36 @@
>>                         #phy-cells = <0>;
>>                         status = "disabled";
>>                 };
>> +
>> +               thermal: thermal@e61f0000 {
>
> According to the Hard User Manual rev. 0.80, the base address is e6190000?

You are correct.
I will update this patch to fix it.

>
>> +                       compatible = "renesas,thermal-r8a77995",
>> +                                    "renesas,rcar-thermal";
>
> I would drop the fallback property, cfr. my comments on the DT binding
> patch.

Yes. I will do it.

>
>> +                       reg = <0 0xe61f0000 0 0x10>, <0 0xe61f0100 0 0x38>;
>
> 0xe619... (twice)

I will fix it.


Thanks,
Kaneko

>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds