From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: youlin.pei-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
ryder.lee-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
sean.wang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
yingjoe.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
eddie.huang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] PCI: mediatek: Using slot's devfn for compare to fix mtk_pcie_find_port logic
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 11:02:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1538967737.6246.5.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181002105945.GA27736-4tUPXFaYRHv6sAKXYmQ0tx/iLCjYCKR+VpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 11:59 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:36:41PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 06:04:32PM +0800, honghui.zhang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org wrote:
> > > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> > >
> > > The Mediatek's host controller has two slots, each with it's own control
> > > registers. The host driver need to identify which slot was connected
> > > in order to access the device's configuration space. There's problem
> > > for current host driver to find out which slot was connected to for
> > > a given EP device.
> > >
> > > Assuming each slot have connect with one EP device as below:
> > >
> > > host bridge
> > > bus 0 --> __________|_______
> > > | |
> > > | |
> > > slot 0 slot 1
> > > bus 1 -->| bus 2 --> |
> > > | |
> > > EP 0 EP 1
> > >
> > > During PCI enumeration, system software will scan all the PCI device
> > > starting from devfn 0. So it will get the proper port for slot0 and
> > > slot1 device when using PCI_SLOT(devfn) for match. But it will get
> > > the wrong slot for EP1: The devfn will be start from 0 when scanning
> > > EP1 behind slot1, it will get port0 since the PCI_SLOT(EP1) is match
> > > for port0's slot value. So the host driver should not using EP's devfn
> > > but the slot's devfn(the slot which EP was connected to) for match.
> > >
> > > This patch fix the mtk_pcie_find_port's logic by using the slot's
> > > devfn for match if finding device connected to the subordinate bus.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> > > index 9999dae..264e03f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> > > @@ -337,10 +337,25 @@ static struct mtk_pcie_port *mtk_pcie_find_port(struct pci_bus *bus,
> > > {
> > > struct mtk_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata;
> > > struct mtk_pcie_port *port;
> > > + struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Walk the bus hierarchy to get the devfn value
> > > + * of the port in the root bus.
> > > + */
> > > + while (bus && bus->number) {
> > > + dev = bus->self;
> > > + bus = dev->bus;
> >
> > If you add:
> >
> > devfn = dev->devfn;
> >
> > here
> >
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + list_for_each_entry(port, &pcie->ports, list) {
> > > + /* Using slot's devfn to compare for subordinary bus. */
> > > + if (dev)
> > > + devfn = dev->devfn;
> >
> > You can remove this ugly hunk altogether (and dev initialization
> > to NULL).
>
> Hi Honghui,
>
> if you can make this change I would merge this series, it has been
> been in the mailing lists for a while, I can make that change too
> just let me know please.
>
Hi, Lorenzo, sorry for the late reply.
I tried your advise and it works fine.
I will send another version to fix this, as well as to add a fix tag in
the commit message of patch 6.
thanks
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-08 3:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-28 10:04 [PATCH v5 0/9] PCI: mediatek: fixup find_port, enable_msi and add pm, module support honghui.zhang
2018-09-28 10:04 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] PCI: mediatek: Using slot's devfn for compare to fix mtk_pcie_find_port logic honghui.zhang
2018-10-01 14:36 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-10-02 10:59 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
[not found] ` <20181002105945.GA27736-4tUPXFaYRHv6sAKXYmQ0tx/iLCjYCKR+VpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-08 3:02 ` Honghui Zhang [this message]
2018-09-28 10:04 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] PCI: mediatek: Fixup class ID for MT7622 as PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI honghui.zhang
2018-09-28 10:04 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] PCI: mediatek: Remove the redundant dev->pm_domain check honghui.zhang
2018-09-28 10:04 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] PCI: mediatek: Convert to use pci_host_probe() honghui.zhang
2018-09-28 15:41 ` Ryder Lee
2018-09-29 0:16 ` Honghui Zhang
2018-09-29 5:55 ` Ryder Lee
2018-09-28 10:04 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] PCI: mediatek: Move the mtk_pcie_startup_port_v2 function's define after mtk_pcie_setup_irq honghui.zhang
2018-09-28 10:04 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] PCI: mediatek: Enable msi after clock enabled honghui.zhang
2018-10-02 11:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-09-28 10:04 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] PCI: mediatek: Add system pm support for MT2712 and MT7622 honghui.zhang
2018-09-28 10:04 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] PCI: mediatek: Save the GIC IRQ in mtk_pcie_port honghui.zhang
2018-09-28 10:04 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] PCI: mediatek: Add loadable kernel module support honghui.zhang
2018-09-29 5:58 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] PCI: mediatek: fixup find_port, enable_msi and add pm, " Ryder Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1538967737.6246.5.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
--to=honghui.zhang-nus5lvnupcjwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=eddie.huang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ryder.lee-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sean.wang-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yingjoe.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=youlin.pei-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).