From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Add L2 cache topology to ARM Ltd boards/models Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:43:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1542574.d99bFx24pn@wuerfel> References: <1421841750-26722-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1421841750-26722-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Cc: Sudeep Holla , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Catalin Marinas , Liviu Dudau , Olof Johansson List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 21 January 2015 12:02:30 Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Hi Arnd/Olof, > > Though this patch and commit 5d425c18653731af6 ("arm64: kernel: add > support for cpu cache information") which is in -next(via arm64) are > dependent to provide desired functionality, then can go indepedently > if you think there could be conflicts if this change is taken via arm64. > If not, Catalin can pick up with your acks after the review. I think it would be better to take this through arm-soc. It's not extremely likely to cause conflicts, but as you say there are no strict dependencies on which goes in first, so there is no harm in merging them separately. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html