From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philipp Zabel Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] reset: hi6220: Add support for AO reset controller Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 11:46:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1553078780.7071.8.camel@pengutronix.de> References: <1552937931-23050-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <1552937931-23050-5-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1552937931-23050-5-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Griffin , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, xuwei5@hisilicon.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, yuq825@gmail.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Peter, On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 19:38 +0000, Peter Griffin wrote: > This is required to bring Mali450 gpu out of reset. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin > --- > drivers/reset/hisilicon/hi6220_reset.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/reset/hisilicon/hi6220_reset.c b/drivers/reset/hisilicon/hi6220_reset.c > index d5e5229..0cd5f92 100644 > --- a/drivers/reset/hisilicon/hi6220_reset.c > +++ b/drivers/reset/hisilicon/hi6220_reset.c > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ > enum hi6220_reset_ctrl_type { > PERIPHERAL, > MEDIA, > + AO, > }; > > struct hi6220_reset_data { > @@ -95,6 +96,47 @@ static const struct reset_control_ops hi6220_media_reset_ops = { > .deassert = hi6220_media_deassert, > }; > > +#define AO_SCTRL_SC_PW_CLKEN0 0x800 > +#define AO_SCTRL_SC_PW_CLKDIS0 0x804 > + > +#define AO_SCTRL_SC_PW_RSTEN0 0x810 > +#define AO_SCTRL_SC_PW_RSTDIS0 0x814 > + > +#define AO_SCTRL_SC_PW_ISOEN0 0x820 > +#define AO_SCTRL_SC_PW_ISODIS0 0x824 > +#define AO_MAX_INDEX 12 > + > +static int hi6220_ao_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rc_dev, > + unsigned long idx) > +{ > + struct hi6220_reset_data *data = to_reset_data(rc_dev); > + struct regmap *regmap = data->regmap; > + int ret; > + > + ret = regmap_write(regmap, AO_SCTRL_SC_PW_RSTEN0, BIT(idx)); > + ret |= regmap_write(regmap, AO_SCTRL_SC_PW_ISOEN0, BIT(idx)); > + ret |= regmap_write(regmap, AO_SCTRL_SC_PW_CLKDIS0, BIT(idx)); What if two regmap_writes return a different error code? Better check for ret and return individually. Also, no need to issue two more writes if the first one failed. > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int hi6220_ao_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rc_dev, > + unsigned long idx) > +{ > + struct hi6220_reset_data *data = to_reset_data(rc_dev); > + struct regmap *regmap = data->regmap; > + int ret; > + > + ret = regmap_write(regmap, AO_SCTRL_SC_PW_RSTDIS0, BIT(idx)); > + ret |= regmap_write(regmap, AO_SCTRL_SC_PW_ISODIS0, BIT(idx)); > + ret |= regmap_write(regmap, AO_SCTRL_SC_PW_CLKEN0, BIT(idx)); Same as above. Otherwise this looks fine. With this fixed, I could pick up patches 2, 4, and 5. regards Philipp