From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zhiyong Tao Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mt8183: add pintcrl file Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:54:35 +0800 Message-ID: <1553568875.21970.5.camel@mhfsdcap03> References: <20190325122302.5483-1-zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com> <20190325122302.5483-3-zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com> <20190325193005.GA18114@bogus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190325193005.GA18114@bogus> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rob Herring Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, sean.wang@kernel.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, hui.liu@mediatek.com, eddie.huang@mediatek.com, chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com, biao.huang@mediatek.com, hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com, erin.lo@mediatek.com, sean.wang@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2019-03-25 at 14:30 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 08:23:00PM +0800, Zhiyong Tao wrote: > > This patch adds pinctrl file for mt8183. > > Still has a typo in the subject. ==>we will change it in next version > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-pinfunc.h | 1120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 1120 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-pinfunc.h > > Add acks/reviewed-bys when posting new versions. This should also be > called v8 even though a different person sent it. ==>we will add acks/reviewed-bys when posting new versions in nxet version. This patch is based on "https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10814251/". If it is based on the patch "https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10814251/", it should called v8. But I send this patch, we call it v3. Because it it is based on the patch "https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10836969/". In these v3 patches, we send 4 patches. So we should call 1/4,2/4,3/4 as v9 in next patch, and call 4/4 patch as v5. is it right? Thanks. > > Rob >