From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Qii Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: Add MediaTek i2c AC timing binding Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 20:55:21 +0800 Message-ID: <1563368121.16970.7.camel@mhfsdcap03> References: <1560240715-22595-1-git-send-email-qii.wang@mediatek.com> <1560240715-22595-2-git-send-email-qii.wang@mediatek.com> <20190626133941.GL801@ninjato> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190626133941.GL801@ninjato> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, leilk.liu@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 15:39 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 04:11:54PM +0800, Qii Wang wrote: > > Add i2c AC timing binding to binding file. It can give the AC > > timing parameters to meet I2C specification at different speed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Qii Wang > > I think this is a too specific 1:1 mapping of your register set into DT > world. We already have these generic parameters: > > - clock-frequency > frequency of bus clock in Hz. > > - i2c-scl-falling-time-ns > Number of nanoseconds the SCL signal takes to fall; t(f) in the I2C > specification. > > - i2c-scl-internal-delay-ns > Number of nanoseconds the IP core additionally needs to setup SCL. > > - i2c-scl-rising-time-ns > Number of nanoseconds the SCL signal takes to rise; t(r) in the I2C > specification. > > - i2c-sda-falling-time-ns > Number of nanoseconds the SDA signal takes to fall; t(f) in the I2C > specification. > > (check Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c.txt) > > Can't you use those to derive your values from that? Which ones are you missing > if not? > > Regards, > > Wolfram I have take a little time to develop a new patch which based on your suggestions, and it tested OK. Thanks for your suggestions, I will update the patch after I test it fully.