From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] pinctrl: samsung: Usability and extensibiltiy improvements Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:22:17 +0200 Message-ID: <1574970.TNZCJfSix7@amdc1227> References: <1349685556-23718-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-reply-to: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Thomas Abraham , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, tomasz.figa@gmail.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:46:28 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > This patch series is a work on improving usability and extensibiltiy of > > the> > > pinctrl-samsung driver. It consists of three main parts: > > - moving SoC-specific data to device tree > > - converting the driver to use one GPIO chip and one IRQ domain per > > pin bank - introducing generic wake-up interrupt capability > > description > > So can you prepare a patch series which does all but the first > bullet to begin with, and a SoC-and register offset patch > on top of that as a separate series, because it is controversial? > > I don't like that these two things are mingled together like this > in an all-or-nothing manner. > > So I'm OK with a patch series for bulle (2) and (3) but not (1). > > And I'd like to have Thomas A:s ACK on the series too. > I have managed to rework the changes to drop (1). I will send next version of patches tomorrow. It would be nice to have them merged for 3.7, as they are rather important for further work. Moving data from the driver to device tree is not as important, so it might be discussed later. Best regards, -- Tomasz Figa Samsung Poland R&D Center