From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A4EC32771 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E6722522 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=crapouillou.net header.i=@crapouillou.net header.b="Zni2LUe8" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729668AbgAOVQK (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:16:10 -0500 Received: from outils.crapouillou.net ([89.234.176.41]:59982 "EHLO crapouillou.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729134AbgAOVQK (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:16:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=crapouillou.net; s=mail; t=1579122967; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jKAektEMk3dDvQFgHsowwSKIu5ew5qUHWRblTQXzHFw=; b=Zni2LUe8aCzgd+JjU/p68g5Vnt8ezP3ky8vYPVLMTdje6sEpYv118/+EzsMcBHF+3x09PG AQoYRruV4gmCmlEBP4vEdNaRoIv030EFNfnDuKSegIPBUgOVdxx4nIsV8s/WXj+mMZGKhq GZwqCMna33m+D4kXeSOoMm5VX3LSsV4= Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:15:51 -0300 From: Paul Cercueil Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] remoteproc: Add prepare/unprepare callbacks To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , od@zcrc.me, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <1579122951.3.2@crapouillou.net> In-Reply-To: <20191221202039.GG549437@yoga> References: <20191210164014.50739-1-paul@crapouillou.net> <20191210164014.50739-3-paul@crapouillou.net> <20191221202039.GG549437@yoga> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Bjorn, Le sam., d=E9c. 21, 2019 at 12:20, Bjorn Andersson=20 a =E9crit : > On Tue 10 Dec 08:40 PST 2019, Paul Cercueil wrote: >=20 >> The .prepare() callback is called before the firmware is loaded to >> memory. This is useful for instance in the case where some setup is >> required for the memory to be accessible. >>=20 >=20 > Would it make sense to somehow tie this prepare/unprepare to the=20 > actual > struct rproc_mem_entry that needs the resource enabled? Do you need such granularity? In my case, the three memories need the same clock to be enabled. -Paul >=20 >> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil >> --- >>=20 >> Notes: >> v2-v4: No change >>=20 >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- >> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++ >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>=20 >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c=20 >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> index 0a9fc7fdd1c3..3ea5f675a148 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> @@ -1299,11 +1299,19 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc,=20 >> const struct firmware *fw) >> struct device *dev =3D &rproc->dev; >> int ret; >>=20 >> + if (rproc->ops->prepare) { >> + ret =3D rproc->ops->prepare(rproc); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to prepare rproc: %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + } >> + >> /* load the ELF segments to memory */ >> ret =3D rproc_load_segments(rproc, fw); >> if (ret) { >> dev_err(dev, "Failed to load program segments: %d\n", ret); >> - return ret; >> + goto unprepare_rproc; >> } >>=20 >> /* >> @@ -1354,6 +1362,9 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc,=20 >> const struct firmware *fw) >> rproc_unprepare_subdevices(rproc); >> reset_table_ptr: >> rproc->table_ptr =3D rproc->cached_table; >> +unprepare_rproc: >> + if (rproc->ops->unprepare) >> + rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc); >>=20 >> return ret; >> } >> @@ -1483,6 +1494,9 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc,=20 >> bool crashed) >>=20 >> rproc->state =3D RPROC_OFFLINE; >>=20 >> + if (rproc->ops->unprepare) >> + rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc); >> + >> dev_info(dev, "stopped remote processor %s\n", rproc->name); >>=20 >> return 0; >> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> index 5f201f0c86c3..a6272d1ba384 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status { >>=20 >> /** >> * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers >> + * @prepare: prepare the device for power up (before the firmware=20 >> is loaded) >> + * @unprepare: unprepare the device after it is stopped >> * @start: power on the device and boot it >> * @stop: power off the device >> * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter) >> @@ -371,6 +373,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status { >> * @get_boot_addr: get boot address to entry point specified in=20 >> firmware >> */ >> struct rproc_ops { >> + int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc); >> + void (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc); >> int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc); >> int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc); >> void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid); >> -- >> 2.24.0 >>=20 =