Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: iio: light: add support for Dyna-Image AL3320A

[David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>]

Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> napsal Čt, 6. úno 2020 v 14∶27:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:16 PM David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> napsal Čt, 6. úno 2020 v 19∶07:
>>  > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 10:30:27AM +0100, David Heidelberg wrote:
>>  >>  This commit add dt-bindings support to al3320a driver and
>>  >> vendor-prefix
>>  >>  dynaimage.
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>  Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
>>  >>  ---
>>  >>   .../bindings/iio/light/al3320a.yaml           | 45
>>  >> +++++++++++++++++++
>>  >>   .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml  |  2 +
>>  >>   2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
>>  >>   create mode 100644
>>  >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/al3320a.yaml
>>  >>
>>  >>  diff --git
>>  >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/al3320a.yaml
>>  >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/al3320a.yaml
>>  >>  new file mode 100644
>>  >>  index 000000000000..08e7ee4bdf55
>>  >>  --- /dev/null
>>  >>  +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/al3320a.yaml
>>  >>  @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
>>  >>  +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only)
>>  >
>>  > Dual license new bindings:
>>  >
>>  > (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> 
>>  It BSD usage in Linux kernel enforced for bindings?
> 
> Yes, bindings are exported and used by other projects. And may get
> moved out completely.

So do I assume right if I'm not dual licencing also under BSD, patch 
won't get merged?

By principle I don't like to being forced give my work to projects 
which don't comply with GPL 2. Not much happy about it, but what can I 
do, when I want this sensors DT merged in...

Due to the fact it's simple definition, I'll dual licence it also to 
BSD for next patch version.

>> 
>>  I'd like to publish my code only under GPL if possible.