From: Hsin-hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
"Josef Friedl" <josef.friedl@speed.at>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
<hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] mfd: mt6358: refine interrupt code
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 16:29:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1596443379.31084.3.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200727154840.GY1850026@dell>
Hi,
On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 16:48 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
>
> > This patch refines the interrupt related code to support new chips.
>
> Refines in what way?
>
> What makes this better?
>
Thanks for the comment. I will add more information into comment message
based on my below explanation.
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > include/linux/mfd/mt6358/core.h | 8 ++---
> > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c
> > index db734f2..4b094e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c
> > @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> >
> > -static struct irq_top_t mt6358_ints[] = {
> > +#define MTK_PMIC_REG_WIDTH 16
> > +
> > +static const struct irq_top_t mt6358_ints[] = {
> > MT6358_TOP_GEN(BUCK),
> > MT6358_TOP_GEN(LDO),
> > MT6358_TOP_GEN(PSC),
> > @@ -24,6 +26,13 @@ static struct irq_top_t mt6358_ints[] = {
> > MT6358_TOP_GEN(MISC),
> > };
> >
> > +static struct pmic_irq_data mt6358_irqd = {
> > + .num_top = ARRAY_SIZE(mt6358_ints),
> > + .num_pmic_irqs = MT6358_IRQ_NR,
> > + .top_int_status_reg = MT6358_TOP_INT_STATUS0,
> > + .pmic_ints = mt6358_ints,
> > +};
>
> Dynamically assigned driver data is usually preferred.
>
> Why have you gone static?
>
Do you consider the memory allocation?
Below modification is to assign necessary data dynamically and the code
will become longer with more chips if we assign every member of the
structure.
@@ -180,17 +190,18 @@ int mt6358_irq_init(struct mt6397_chip *chip)
int i, j, ret;
struct pmic_irq_data *irqd;
- irqd = devm_kzalloc(chip->dev, sizeof(*irqd),
GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!irqd)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ switch (chip->chip_id) {
+ case MT6358_CHIP_ID:
+ chip->irq_data = &mt6358_irqd;
+ break;
- chip->irq_data = irqd;
+ default:
+ dev_err(chip->dev, "unsupported chip: 0x%x
\n", chip->chip_id);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
mutex_init(&chip->irqlock);
- irqd->top_int_status_reg = MT6358_TOP_INT_STATUS0;
- irqd->num_pmic_irqs = MT6358_IRQ_NR;
- irqd->num_top = ARRAY_SIZE(mt6358_ints);
-
+ irqd = chip->irq_data;
irqd->enable_hwirq = devm_kcalloc(chip->dev,
irqd->num_pmic_irqs,
sizeof(*irqd->enable_hwirq),
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-03 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-23 12:58 [PATCH 0/8] Add Support for MediaTek PMIC MT6359 Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-07-23 12:58 ` [PATCH 1/8] mfd: mt6358: refine interrupt code Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-07-27 15:48 ` Lee Jones
2020-08-03 8:29 ` Hsin-hsiung Wang [this message]
2020-08-10 7:31 ` Lee Jones
2020-07-23 12:58 ` [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: mfd: Add compatible for the MediaTek MT6359 PMIC Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-07-23 21:31 ` Rob Herring
2020-07-28 6:33 ` Lee Jones
2020-07-23 12:58 ` [PATCH 3/8] dt-bindings: regulator: Add document for MT6359 regulator Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-07-23 12:58 ` [PATCH 4/8] mfd: Add support for the MediaTek MT6359 PMIC Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-07-28 6:42 ` Lee Jones
2020-07-23 12:58 ` [PATCH 5/8] regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-07-24 12:21 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-23 12:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] regulator: mt6359: Set the enable time for LDOs Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-07-24 12:22 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-23 12:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359P regulator Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-07-24 12:23 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-23 12:58 ` [PATCH 8/8] arm64: dts: mt6359: add PMIC MT6359 related nodes Hsin-Hsiung Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1596443379.31084.3.camel@mtksdaap41 \
--to=hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
--cc=josef.friedl@speed.at \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).