From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add binding for Rock960 board Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:22:26 +0200 Message-ID: <1606406.b630GQBvc1@phil> References: <20180910151356.25946-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> <20180910151356.25946-3-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180910151356.25946-3-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Manivannan Sadhasivam Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, vicencb@gmail.com, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, ezequiel@collabora.com, enric.balletbo@collabora.com, pbrobinson@gmail.com, tom@vamrs.com, dev@vamrs.com, stephen@vamrs.com, amit.kucheria@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, 10. September 2018, 17:13:54 CEST schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam: > Add devicetree binding for Rock960 board from Vamrs Limited. > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt > index acfd3c773dd0..aaad9e2ff9a3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt > @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ Rockchip platforms device tree bindings > Required root node properties: > - compatible = "vamrs,ficus", "rockchip,rk3399"; > > +- 96boards RK3399 Rock960 (ROCK960 Consumer Edition) > + Required root node properties: > + - compatible = "vamrs,rk3399-rock960", "rockchip,rk3399"; hmm, are there more boards labeled rock960 from Vamrs? Because I'm trying to determine what makes "vamrs,rock960" unsuitable. Heiko