Re: [PATCH v5 04/16] memory: mtk-smi: Add device-link between smi-larb and smi-common

[Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>]

On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 14:40 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/04/2021 11:11, Yong Wu wrote:
> > Normally, If the smi-larb HW need work, we should enable the smi-common
> > HW power and clock firstly.
> > This patch adds device-link between the smi-larb dev and the smi-common
> > dev. then If pm_runtime_get_sync(smi-larb-dev), the pm_runtime_get_sync
> > (smi-common-dev) will be called automatically.
> > 
> > Also, Add DL_FLAG_STATELESS to avoid the smi-common clocks be gated when
> > probe.
> > 
> > CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
> > Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> I understood this is a dependency for other patches, so:
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> 
> If I am wrong and I can take it via memory tree, let me know.

Hi Krzysztof,

Thanks very much for your quickly review.

I think it is ok if it go through memory tree. In the original patch, we
pm_runtime_get(smi-common-dev) in the smi-larb's pm resume callback.
This patch only use device-link do this. thus, this patch have no
function change. it only adjusts the SMI internal code flow.

In addition, [14/16] expects your Acked-by. and that one should be
merged with the others.

About the others patches, I'm not sure which tree they should go
through. they cross several trees, dt-binding/iommu/media/drm/dts.

Not sure if Matthias could have time to review and give some suggestion.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek