From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: ohci-/ehci-platform: Change compatible string to ?hci-platform Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:43:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1635726.gc3dEs0zOi@wuerfel> References: Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Alan Stern Cc: Hans de Goede , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Roger Quadros , Tony Prisk , Florian Fainelli , Maxime Ripard , linux-usb , linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree , Al Cooper List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 11 February 2014 10:27:12 Alan Stern wrote: > > It might even be a good idea to change the "xhci-platform" string to > match, it that doesn't cause too much trouble. The original xhci binding was contributed by Al Cooper, but I don't see any dts files using it. I agree that xhci-generic is a better name than xhci-platform, and I think we should make that the recommended string. If Al or someone thinks the xhci-generic string might already be used in production devices, we should however allow both names in the binding and in the driver. Arnd