From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] of: Rename "poweroff-source" property to "system-power-controller" Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:12:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1651776.uhbV5BHLKC@diego> References: <1415885699-1465-1-git-send-email-user@radxa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Romain Perier Cc: Johan Hovold , Lee Jones , Mark Brown , Grant Likely , robh , devicetree , Liam Girdwood , Mark Rutland , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Felipe Balbi List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, 24. November 2014, 14:01:02 schrieb Romain Perier: > 2014-11-24 13:58 GMT+01:00 Romain Perier : > > So I need to resend this patch which would only introduce an helper > > function which checks for "system-power-controller" property (it would > > also have a new commit message). > > As you suggested, this helper might be named > > "of_device_is_system_power_controller" ? > > I mean, the backward compatibility can be handled directly from the > device driver which would use the new property, no ? yep, that is what Grant asked for ... to have drivers that need backward- compatibility (like with the "ti,"-prefix) to do this themselfs. Heiko